[Vision2020] Panel Rejects Day-Care Rules

[lfalen]

Wayne
Working from hone is great and would be a plus for everyone.

Roger
-----Original message-----
From: "Art Deco" deco at moscow.com
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:03:21 -0800
To: "Vision 2020" vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Panel Rejects Day-Care Rules

> Roger writes:
> 
> "The statements by some Republicans that the voted against the day care 
> bill, because mothers should stay at home is ridiculous. In an ideal world 
> that would be desirable."
> 
> Why in an ideal world, it is the just the mothers that stay home?  Why not 
> let the families choose, if they can afford to live on one salary, which 
> parent stays home?
> 
> Why not make it a national/state/local policy to promote much broader use of 
> the work from home concept?  We now have the hardware and software 
> technology that would allow parts of many jobs to be done at home.  Besides 
> allowing more time for parents to spend with their families, such a 
> workforce shift would save gasoline, etc.
> 
> W.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "lfalen" <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> To: "Ellen Roskovich" <gussie443 at hotmail.com>; <thansen at moscow.com>; 
> <suehovey at moscow.com>; <graylex at yahoo.com>; <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Panel Rejects Day-Care Rules
> 
> 
> >I am glad you brought up on site day care.  This is something I have 
> >thought was a good idea for a long time for those companies that are big 
> >enough to do it. Obviously small companies can not. The statements by some 
> >Republicans that the voted against the day care bill, because mothers 
> >should stay at home is ridiculous. In an ideal world that would be 
> >desirable. There are many circumstances where that is not feasible. Single 
> >working mothers are only one example. Day care is needed and they need to 
> >be safe. Some allowances should be made for babysitter, but professional 
> >day care centers at least need some minimal rules to insure the kids are 
> >not put in harms way.
> >
> > Roger
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: "Ellen Roskovich" gussie443 at hotmail.com
> > Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:49:45 -0800
> > To: thansen at moscow.com,  suehovey at moscow.com,  graylex at yahoo.com, 
> > vision2020 at moscow.com
> > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Panel Rejects Day-Care Rules
> >
> >> =======================================================
> >>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >>                http://www.fsr.net
> >>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >> =======================================================
> >>
> >
> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >               http://www.fsr.net
> >          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
> > 
> 
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>                http://www.fsr.net                       
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================