[Vision2020] "The First 100 Days If Democrats Win"

[Tony]

Pat, you needn't shelve your first amendment right to free expression simply 
because it offends Andreas and his fellow intolerant liberals.  He knows 
damned good and well that you never used the term "take over" to describe 
what we face from Islamic radicals, but rather clearly stated that they 
would gain a foothold and then a stranglehold.  Clearly Andreas specializes 
in mischaracterizing the positions of his opponents and then condemning them 
for words not they, but he, uttered.

Andreas also knows, but hopes others will overlook, the fact that taking 
certain minimal measures to enhance security for American citizens, hardly 
constitutes "tossing out" the fourth amendment.  Obviously Andreas' penchant 
for hyperbole has overwhelmed him.

Pat, you may have noticed that your most accurate and persuasive postings 
result in a torrent of shrill denunciation from those who claim to value a 
diversity of views.  Comical isn't it?  They value diversity as long as long 
as it excludes the conservative perspective.  They are tolerant so long as 
you agree with them.

Do continue to contribute.  As censors like Andreas demand your silence, 
know that you are standing up for right against those who are tragically 
wrong.

Take care,  -Tony
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andreas Schou" <ophite at gmail.com>
To: "Pat Kraut" <pkraut at moscow.com>
Cc: "vision2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020]"The First 100 Days If Democrats Win"


> On 10/30/06, Pat Kraut <pkraut at moscow.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sept. 11, 2026, U.S. high school textbook excerpt: The Progressive
>> Democrat's Contributions to the Third World War.
>> Emboldened the enemy with their barrage of politically motivated
>> claptrapping about Bush and the war.
>> Hampered the ability of the nation to defend itself by saying that the 
>> very
>> tools used to keep us safe,
>> among them phone taps and financial transaction monitoring, were not 
>> legal.
>> Defamed the great institutions of the armed forces because of the
>> foolishness of a few individuals.
>> Hobbled the investigators trying to subvert future terrorist activity, by
>> screeching so loudly for the rights of the enemy combatants.
>> Told half truths about the dangers we faced, causing the country to be
>> divided concerning the threat until it was too late.
>> Lied about their own understanding of the pre-9/11 information, to regain
>> power exacerbating a split in the country,
>> which further weakened our resolve.
>> Their rhetoric, hidden behind a guise of concern, hid the truth of the
>> threat so they could gain power and implement
>> policy that appeased and eventually enabled the fascists of the 21st 
>> century
>> to gain a foothold and then a chokehold on this great nation.
>>
>> One wonders if the democrats really think about the future at all!
>>
>
> Pat --
>
> Please describe to me the mechanism by which Islamic terrorists will
> take over our country. Please explain to me the reason why, given that
> they have killed fewer Americans than bee stings over the past thirty
> years, we should completely toss out the Fourth Amendment. Please
> point out the phrase in the Constitution allowing the President to set
> aside laws if he chooses to.
>
> Alternatively, please shut up.
>
> -- ACS
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>