[Vision2020] NOAA:Temperature Anomalies Jan. 2007

[david sarff]

It seems that these temps might all go out the window as regional predictors 
if the ocean thermal conveyors collapse.
Dave

http://www.whoi.edu/institutes/occi/viewArticle.do?id=9986



>From: "Ted Moffett" <starbliss at gmail.com>
>To: mushroom at moscow.com
>CC: Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] NOAA:Temperature Anomalies Jan. 2007
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:13:49 -0800
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from trumpet.fsr.net ([64.126.132.9]) by 
>bay0-mc11-f15.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Tue, 
>20 Feb 2007 05:14:17 -0800
>Received: from trumpet.fsr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by trumpet.fsr.net 
>(8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1KDDrdP091302;Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:13:55 
>-0800 (PST)(envelope-from vision2020-bounces at moscow.com)
>Received: from mail-gw.fsr.net (mail-gw.fsr.net [64.126.132.22])by 
>trumpet.fsr.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1KDDqBv091257for 
><vision2020 at lists.fsr.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:13:52 -0800 
>(PST)(envelope-from owner-vision2020 at mail-gw.fsr.net)
>Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx175.postini.com [64.18.0.56])by 
>mail-gw.fsr.net (8.13.1/8.12.3) with SMTP id l1KDDrJe023397for 
><vision2020 at firststepinternet.com>;Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:13:53 -0800 
>(PST)(envelope-from starbliss at gmail.com)
>Received: from source ([64.126.132.20]) (using TLSv1) 
>byexprod5mx175.postini.com ([64.18.4.11]) with SMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 
>05:13:52 PST
>Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx177.postini.com [64.18.0.58])by 
>mx2.fsr.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l1KDDo00044984for 
><vision2020 at moscow.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:13:51 -0800 
>(PST)(envelope-from starbliss at gmail.com)
>Received: from source ([66.249.82.231]) by 
>exprod5mx177.postini.com([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:13:51 
>PST
>Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i31so1868054wxdfor 
><vision2020 at moscow.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:13:50 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by 10.90.66.9 with SMTP id o9mr8527239aga.1171977230181;Tue, 20 
>Feb 2007 05:13:50 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by 10.90.63.1 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:13:49 -0800 (PST)
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt0wDM6PVaWSkz/2V5AlwTs47rwkbBb8+Ws=
>References: 
><d03f69e0702181618w28d99badp389a4313845369be at mail.gmail.com><45D9DE6D.9090907 at moscow.com>
>X-pstn-levels: (S:55.10982/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 
>)
>X-pstn-levels: (S:55.10982/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 
>)
>X-BeenThere: vision2020 at moscow.com
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: Moscow/Latah county community discussion list 
><vision2020.moscow.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/vision2020>,<mailto:vision2020-request at moscow.com?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020>
>List-Post: <mailto:vision2020 at moscow.com>
>List-Help: <mailto:vision2020-request at moscow.com?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/vision2020>,<mailto:vision2020-request at moscow.com?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
>Return-Path: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2007 13:14:18.0005 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[06B9F450:01C754F1]
>
>Don et. al.
>
>Recent records indicate that this past January was globally the warmest on
>record:
>
>*GLOBAL AVERAGE TEMPERATURE FOR JANUARY HIGHEST ON RECORD, U.S. TEMPERATURE
>NEAR AVERAGE FOR MONTH*
>
>NOAA apparently thought this information important enough to place on the
>main load page for their web site:
>http://www.noaa.org
>
>Ted Moffett
>
>On 2/19/07, Don Coombs <mushroom at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Ted--
>>
>>Thanks for posting the NOAA graphic. It's pretty
>>straightforward, and I understand that the biggest
>>circles represent places where the average temp this
>>past January was 5 or more degrees C (or 9 or more
>>degrees F) different from the average of the previous
>>30 Januaries.
>>
>>Before I say anything critical, you should know that I
>>don't see how there can be much doubt that global
>>warming exists and that we should try to deal with it.
>>
>>If you are going to say that temperatures were more
>>varied than usual last January, though, it would help
>>us to know how much they usually varied. Maybe, for
>>example, there was a January in 1980 which would also
>>have yielded a graphic with lots of big circles.
>>
>>It's not your responsibility to offer up a measure of
>>variability; I'm just saying that such a measure would
>>be useful.
>>
>>Another thought: There were lots of those big circles
>>on the graph, which suggests that there must have been
>>some sites which could have been marked (with even
>>bigger circles?) as 6 or 7 degees C different, rather
>>than just "5 degrees or more." That would have been
>>even more impressive and, I guess, even more of "an
>>inconvient truth."
>>
>>Don Coombs
>>
>>The graph came from:
>>
>> >
>>http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2007/images/jan2007-global-temp-anomalies.jpg
>>
>>
>>


>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and more….then map the best route! 
http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag1&FORM=MGAC01