[Vision2020] Mixed news for Wolves

[lfalen]

Those are reasonable numbers. I don't hunt either, but support those who do.Yesterday The Nez Perce Tribe came out in favor of delistiing. They were among those responsible for the reintroduction of wolves. They said" "Reintroduction has been a success and it is now time to delist"
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: Brent Bradberry brentbradberry at clearwire.net
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:43:03 -0800
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Mixed news for Wolves

> Matt and Paul suggest limited hunting for wolves (e. g. 200 tags/ year). 
> I agree, although I think that the details as to the actual number of 
> tags issued each year, open and closed hunting regions, etc should be 
> left to science (meaning wildlife biologists).
> 
> I do believe that sufficient contiguous habitat, (roadless areas?) 
> should be closed to hunting wolves. I also believe that, once controlled 
> hunting begins, wolves are intelligent enough to learn quickly that 
> humans are dangerous and to be avoided. However, I've said before that 
> the "Devil is in the details"
> 
> Brent Bradberry
> 
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>                http://www.fsr.net                       
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================