[Vision2020] "we have not forgotten, mr. president"

Donovan Arnold donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 14 06:30:57 PDT 2006

You can watch it here:

Debbie Gray <graylex at yahoo.com> wrote:  
Very moving words....

> "We Have Not Forgotten, Mr. President."
> The Nation
> Mon Sep 11, 9:49 PM ET
> The Nation -- Keith Olbermann is without a doubt the
> best news anchor on
> television today. Two weeks ago, echoing the spirit
> of the legendary
> Edward R. Murrow, Olbermann took Donald Rumsfeld to
> task for comparing
> critics of the Iraq war to Nazi appeasers. Tonight,
> broadcasting live from
> above a desolate and still demolished Ground Zero,
> Olbermann delivered a
> stirring eight minute commentary indicting the Bush
> Administration's
> shameful and tragic response to 9/11. The entire
> speech is worth watching
> and reading, so I'm posting the full text below.
> Half a lifetime ago, I worked in this now-empty
> space. And for 40 days
> after the attacks, I worked here again, trying to
> make sense of what
> happened, and was yet to happen, as a reporter.
> All the time, I knew that the very air I breathed
> contained the remains of
> thousands of people, including four of my friends,
> two in the planes and
> -- as I discovered from those "missing posters"
> seared still into my soul
> -- two more in the Towers.
> And I knew too, that this was the pyre for hundreds
> of New York policemen
> and firemen, of whom my family can claim half a
> dozen or more, as our
> ancestors.
> I belabor this to emphasize that, for me this was,
> and is, and always
> shall be, personal.
> And anyone who claims that I and others like me are
> "soft,"or have
> "forgotten" the lessons of what happened here is at
> best a grasping,
> opportunistic, dilettante and at worst, an idiot
> whether he is a
> commentator, or a Vice President, or a President.
> However, of all the things those of us who were here
> five years ago could
> have forecast -- of all the nightmares that unfolded
> before our eyes, and
> the others that unfolded only in our minds -- none
> of us could have
> predicted this.
> Five years later this space is still empty.
> Five years later there is no memorial to the dead.
> Five years later there is no building rising to show
> with proud defiance
> that we would not have our America wrung from us, by
> cowards and
> criminals.
> Five years later this country's wound is still open.
> Five years later this country's mass grave is still
> unmarked.
> Five years later this is still just a background for
> a photo-op.
> It is beyond shameful.
> At the dedication of the Gettysburg Memorial --
> barely four months after
> the last soldier staggered from another Pennsylvania
> field -- Mr. Lincoln
> said, "we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we
> cannot hallow this
> ground. The brave men, living and dead, who
> struggled here, have
> consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or
> detract."
> Lincoln used those words to immortalize their
> sacrifice.
> Today our leaders could use those same words to
> rationalize their
> reprehensible inaction. "We cannot dedicate, we can
> not consecrate, we can
> not hallow this ground." So we won't.
> Instead they bicker and buck pass. They thwart
> private efforts, and jostle
> to claim credit for initiatives that go nowhere.
> They spend the money on
> irrelevant wars, and elaborate self-congratulations,
> and buying off
> columnists to write how good a job they're doing
> instead of doing any job
> at all.
> Five years later, Mr. Bush, we are still fighting
> the terrorists on these
> streets. And look carefully, sir, on these 16 empty
> acres. The terrorists
> are clearly, still winning.
> And, in a crime against every victim here and every
> patriotic sentiment
> you mouthed but did not enact, you have done nothing
> about it.
> And there is something worse still than this vast
> gaping hole in this
> city, and in the fabric of our nation. There is its
> symbolism of the
> promise unfulfilled, the urgent oath, reduced to
> lazy execution.
> The only positive on 9/11 and the days and weeks
> that so slowly and
> painfully followed it was the unanimous humanity,
> here, and throughout the
> country. The government, the President in
> particular, was given every
> possible measure of support.
> Those who did not belong to his party -- tabled
> that.
> Those who doubted the mechanics of his election --
> ignored that.
> Those who wondered of his qualifications -- forgot
> that.
> History teaches us that nearly unanimous support of
> a government cannot be
> taken away from that government by its critics. It
> can only be squandered
> by those who use it not to heal a nation's wounds,
> but to take political
> advantage.
> Terrorists did not come and steal our newly-regained
> sense of being
> American first, and political, fiftieth. Nor did the
> Democrats. Nor did
> the media. Nor did the people.
> The President -- and those around him -- did that.
> They promised bi-partisanship, and then showed that
> to them,
> "bi-partisanship" meant that their party would rule
> and the rest would
> have to follow, or be branded, with ever-escalating
> hysteria, as morally
> or intellectually confused, as appeasers, as those
> who, in the Vice
> President's words yesterday, "validate the strategy
> of the terrorists."
> They promised protection, and then showed that to
> them "protection" meant
> going to war against a despot whose hand they had
> once shaken, a despot
> who we now learn from our own Senate Intelligence
> Committee, hated
> al-Qaida as much as we did.
> The polite phrase for how so many of us were duped
> into supporting a war,
> on the false premise that it had 'something to do'
> with 9/11 is "lying by
> implication."
> The impolite phrase is "impeachable offense."
> Not once in now five years has this President ever
> offered to assume
> responsibility for the failures that led to this
> empty space, and to this,
> the current, curdled, version of our beloved
> country.
> Still, there is a last snapping flame from a final
> candle of respect and
> fairness: even his most virulent critics have never
> suggested he alone
> bears the full brunt of the blame for 9/11.
> Half the time, in fact, this President has been so
> gently treated, that he
> has seemed not even to be the man most responsible
> for anything in his own
> administration.
> Yet what is happening this very night?
> A mini-series, created, influenced -- possibly
> financed by -- the most
> radical and cold of domestic political Machiavellis,
> continues to be
> televised into our homes.
> The documented truths of the last fifteen years are
> replaced by bald-faced
> lies; the talking points of the current regime
> parroted; the whole sorry
> story blurred, by spin, to make the party out of
> office seem vacillating
> and impotent, and the party in office, seem like the
> only option.
> How dare you, Mr. President, after taking cynical
> advantage of the
> unanimity and love, and transmuting it into
> fraudulent war and needless
> death, after monstrously transforming it into fear
> and suspicion and
> turning that fear into the campaign slogan of three
> elections? How dare
> you -- or those around you -- ever "spin" 9/11?
> Just as the terrorists have succeeded -- are still
> succeeding -- as long
> as there is no memorial and no construction here at
> Ground Zero.
> So, too, have they succeeded, and are still
> succeeding as long as this
> government uses 9/11 as a wedge to pit Americans
> against Americans.
> This is an odd point to cite a television program,
> especially one from
> March of 1960. But as Disney's continuing sell-out
> of the truth (and this
> country) suggests, even television programs can be
> powerful things.
> And long ago, a series called "The Twilight Zone"
> broadcast a riveting
> episode entitled "The Monsters Are Due On Maple
> Street."
> In brief: a meteor sparks rumors of an invasion by
> extra-terrestrials
> disguised as humans. The electricity goes out. A
> neighbor pleads for calm.
> Suddenly his car -- and only his car -- starts.
> Someone suggests he must
> be the alien. Then another man's lights go on. As
> charges and suspicion
> and panic overtake the street, guns are inevitably
> produced. An "alien" is
> shot -- but he turns out to be just another
> neighbor, returning from going
> for help. The camera pulls back to a near-by hill,
> where two
> extra-terrestrials are seen manipulating a small
> device that can jam
> electricity. The veteran tells his novice that
> there's no need to actually
> attack, that you just turn off a few of the human
> machines and then, "they
> pick the most dangerous enemy they can find, and
> it's themselves."
> And then, in perhaps his finest piece of writing,
> Rod Serling sums it up
> with words of remarkable prescience, given where we
> find ourselves
> tonight: "The tools of conquest do not necessarily
> come with bombs and
> explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are
> simply thoughts,
> attitudes, prejudices, to be found only in the minds
> of men.
> "For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion
> can destroy, and a
> thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a
> fallout all its own
> -- for the children, and the children yet unborn."
> When those who dissent are told time and time again
> -- as we will be, if
> not tonight by the President, then tomorrow by his
> portable public chorus
> -- that he is preserving our freedom, but that if we
> use any of it, we are
> somehow un-American...When we are scolded, that if
> we merely question, we
> have "forgotten the lessons of 9/11"... look into
> this empty space behind
> me and the bi-partisanship upon which this
> administration also did not
> build, and tell me:
> Who has left this hole in the ground?
> We have not forgotten, Mr. President.
> You have.
> May this country forgive you.

> Copyright  2006 The Nation
> Copyright  2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
> Debbie
>   Debbie Gray      dgray at uidaho.edu
>   We must be willing to get rid of the life we've
> planned,
>   so as to have the life that is waiting for us."
> --Joseph Campbell

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com

Want to be your own boss? Learn how on  Yahoo! Small Business. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060914/48135b61/attachment-0001.htm 

More information about the Vision2020 mailing list