[Vision2020] Debate or Coward?

[Michael]

Donavan!  What are you saying?

 

Story line again:

 

Kirkers insult community; Kirkers have big theonomist, take over
eschatology. 

 

Community critiques Kirkers as any community would.

 

Kirkers unable to rationally defend themselves against criticism; they
instead lie.

 

Kirkers continue to insult. 

 

Insults mount from both directions, and through all the smoke, not one
meaningful and true response is found from the Kirk.

 

This is the story, and this is my point.

 

You, Donavan, are becoming more mysterious as the months drag on. But hey,
that's ok; I'll still be your friend. Even if you just might have defending
the Nazi's against the persecution from the Jews!  And remember, I still
have friends in the Kirk.  Call me Shindler..

 

Michael

 

 

Michael,

You wrote:

"Does not anyone at the Kirk have a rational, argumentative point to be made
about the constant and varied public criticism against them?"

Like I said, I think you guys should just take your case to the city council
to require all members of Christ Church be given a giant bright yellow star
to wear on their arm so we can easily recognize them.

Best,

_DJA 

Michael <metzler at moscow.com> wrote: 

Lucy Jones writes:
 
"If it's not interesting, you could *advertise* it on V2020 the way other
bloggers do who need more
 attention."
 

I am unceasingly dumfounded at how kirkers can continue to make veiled and
slanderous comments even when they are continually exposed for what they
are.  Just this morning I located another kirk blog linked to my site that
revealed yet another misquote. Dale Cortney still refuses to pull an
intentional misquote from my blog that has now been up for months. This is
amazing. After 8 months, and every kirk attack has been in the form of bald
falsehood, nonsensical ridicule, or else strong critique of strawed-man
quotes ripped out of context.  Does not anyone at the Kirk have a rational,
argumentative point to be made about the constant and varied public
criticism against them?  Outside of the silly "persecution" ploy?

 

As for this quote: this has become one of the steady anti-pooh mantras that
kirkers sooth themselves with. So please allow me just this one time to
quickly and modestly point out the relevant fact that my readership is as
strong as Peter Leithart's; you might recall how Wilson boasted about
Leithart's blog in his sermon when  explaining why he was the truly anointed
one in Moscow. Apparently, the kind of "interest" Leithart's blog gets is
evidence for the fact that YHWH will defend the Kirk against its local
enemies; I guess I now have evidence that YHWH is routing for me too.  In
sum, I certainly haven't sent links to Vision 2020 to keep a "needed"
readership (putting aside the claims that I have a mental disorder); I just
like local readership more than non-local, given the common topic of my blog
(which, by the way, is only about 40% Kirk stuff these days). 

 

Dear kirkers, say something true and meaningful. 

 

Sincerely,

Michael Metzler 

www.poohsthink.com <http://www.poohsthink.com/>  

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20061005/7864d8a7/attachment.htm