[Vision2020] What Does 'Too Liberal' Mean?

[Tony]

It appears that a great deal of the mud thrown at the Bush administration 
these past years by the liberal media stuck, and that Bush and Cheney are 
about as popular as Geraldine Farraro.  Only in more patriotic locales like 
Idaho, with its courageous citizens, do the Limbaughs and Hannitys and Roves 
find success in spreading the news of liberal collusion with America's 
enemies.

In Idaho, Bill Sali won a fair race within the rules of the system and 
deserves to be acknowledged as the victor.  Grant deserved to be labeled for 
what he is - a LIBERAL.

For the accurate record, here's what Democrats really believe:  Full 
equality except when social engineering requires racial quotas such as in 
the case of affirmative action; non-violent solutions except when they find 
it convenient to murder the innocent to facilitate consequence-free sex; 
quality education except when an expansion of the federal government is 
proposed and a National Department of Education is created which has 
crippled local control over discipline and curriculum; zero tolerance for 
government corruption except when their Pres is banging interns and lying 
about it under oath; public lands as an inviolable birthright of all 
Americans except as regards the right of the elderly or disabled to access 
wilderness areas; fair and livable wages except when an expansion of hand 
outs requires that those wage earners be taxed into the poorhouse.

Pretty scary?  Yup.

Tony Simpson
Lewiston
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
To: "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 8:52 AM
Subject: [Vision2020] What Does 'Too Liberal' Mean?


> >From the November 10, 2006 edition of the Lewiston Tribune with thanks to
> Chris Norden -
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> What does 'too liberal' mean?
>
> It appears that very little of the mud and excrement thrown at Democrats
> stuck this time, and that instead it's Bush and Cheney who are about as
> popular as a California arsonist and a child-molesting priest. Only in
> rearguard locales like Idaho and the Deep South, with their shrinking 
> blocks
> of 1950's vintage "white" voters, do the Limbaughs and Hannitys and Roves
> succeed in portraying Democrats as evil monsters who drink the blood of
> Christian babies and want to force gay sex in the aisles on Sunday.
>
> In Idaho, Bill Sali won by a mere 5 percent against Larry Grant. Of the 55
> percent who voted for Sali, no doubt some genuinely approved of their
> candidate's ideology and political/personal style - what House Speaker
> Newcomb meant when he called him an idiot. But I'll bet that 5 percent
> margin can be more than accounted for by the millions of dollars' worth of
> advertising smearing Grant as "too liberal for Idaho."
>
> For the record, here's what liberal Democrats believe: full equality under
> the law for all Americans; nonviolent and low-cost solutions whenever
> possible; quality education as an investment in national security; health
> care as a basic right for all Americans; zero tolerance for government
> corruption; public lands as the inviolable and sacred birthright of all
> Americans; fair and livable wages for an honest day's work. Pretty scary,
> huh?
>
> Chris Norden
> Moscow
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Forty percent of the mass of every tree in the forest is crude oil.  Stop
> and think about that.  We call them fossil fuels because they used to be
> live stuff . . . now in the ground is turned into crude oil."
>
> - Bill Sali (September 21, 2006)
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>