[Vision2020] [Spam] Re: Tet Offensive

Matt Decker mattd2107 at hotmail.com
Fri Nov 10 15:21:58 PST 2006




>From: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
>Reply-To: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
>To: "Matt Decker" <mattd2107 at hotmail.com>, sunilramalingam at hotmail.com,     
>    vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: [Vision2020] [Spam] Re:  Tet Offensive
>Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:28:44 -0800
>
>Great post Matt
>
>Roger
>-----Original message-----
>From: "Matt Decker" mattd2107 at hotmail.com
>Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:04:35 -0800
>To: sunilramalingam at hotmail.com,  vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: [Spam] Re: [Vision2020] Tet Offensive
>
> > Sunil,
> >
> > You have a lot or very good points and questions in your last post. What 
>do
> > we do in Iraq? I myself won't kid anyone about what we shoould do and 
>not do
> > now, for I am not the expert. I will leave that to the people in 
>postion. I
> > do feel however, that we did not utilize the best military in world to 
>it's
> > full capabilities. We have young very intelligent and highly motivated
> > Marines and soldiers. Instead we over used them and now have the 
>national
> > gaurd pulling duties. These reservists, no offense, are not as 
>specilized as
> > the regulars. Granted it doesn't matter who is driving into the IED, but 
>I
> > can also say if we had let the generals do there jobs at the begining of 
>the
> > war instead of the senators and brass monkies back home, things would be
> > different.
> >
> > The media has not played a very supportive role in this and vietnam war.
> > They tend to remind the public that Marines have surrounded Falujiah and 
>are
> > about to destroy a mosque that has Al-Zaqauri in it. They will focas 
>their
> > opinion on how destroying that Mosque will be devistating to our cause, 
>but
> > won't realize that in war you have to be fast, deadly, and pack fury 
>with
> > you. War is never good but if your going to do it, then kill them quick. 
>Use
> > sense and only kill the bad ones, including the 13 kid with an ak47 
>shooting
> > at you. But get it done quickly. It sounds  bad but all great leaders 
>have
> > realized this concept, including Hitler. Bad man but a great leader. Ok 
>now
> > i'm rambling.
> >
> > As in the media, they do whats good for them, the story. Portraying a 
>marine
> > as a baby killer, but not have the slightest clue that the kid was 
>shooting
> > at him. If they had shown the bad things we did in WWII, we would have 
>never
> > one. Shooting unarmed Japanese, bombing Drisdin, assasanations, Etc. I 
>don't
> > agree with them, but will also tend to push that aside for the overall
> > agenda, victory and peace.
> >
> > In no means should the media not do story about Cambodia or, Muy Lia, or 
>the
> > recent 7 Marines in Iraq that staged a civilians death as terroristic. 
>They
> > should. We should know about what going on, in order to learn from it. 
>But,
> > the medias portrayal of the Vietnam War and Iraq war has been nothing 
>but
> > negative. Which in turn WILL kill more Marines and soldiers.
> >
> > Try the next time you watch the news and count how many positive stories 
>you
> > here about. Kids being helped, buildings being built, area being 
>secured,
> > then count how many bad stories you here.
> > Then go to conservative web site and look at the good stories you see. A
> > total different story.
> >
> > Anyways I won't go on any further for now, but since I will most likely 
>be
> > called a bunch of names and ridiculed for this, not by you, you have too
> > much class, but by others, I will just let you know I am leaving town 
>for
> > the weekend so a response won't be for a couple of days.
> >
> > Take care Sunil
> >
> >
> > >From: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
> > >To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> > >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Tet Offensive
> > >Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:12:27 -0800
> > >
> > >Matt,
> > >
> > >I tried to find the show tonight at 9, and it wasn't there.  So I did 
>some
> > >reading about Tet here:
> > >
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tet_offensive
> > >
> > >and browsed through Stanley Karnow's 'Vietnam, a history.'  I think Kai 
>is
> > >right in that neither the Vietcong nor the NVA could claim a 
>traditional
> > >military victory after Tet.  But I think they scored a propoganda 
>victory,
> > >and I don't think that was media's fault or doing.  After years of our
> > >government claiming we were close to victory, they struck all over 
>South
> > >Vietnam, even hitting our embassy.  Until Tet, the media went along 
>with
> > >whatever the government was saying.  Tet changed that, and led to more
> > >critical reporting.
> > >
> > >Ultimately, I think Tet points out some of the problems inherent in 
>wars
> > >like Vietnam or Iraq: when you end up in the middle of someone else's 
>civil
> > >war, how do you define victory?  How can you win?  That we had a 
>military
> > >victory at Tet was not enough in the end.
> > >
> > >This is a quote I came across several times in the last couple of 
>months,
> > >in articles comparing Iraq and Vietnam:
> > >
> > >'This brings to mind a story from the Vietnam era, as written up in the
> > >March-April 2005 Military Review: "While negotiating in Hanoi a few 
>days
> > >before Saigon fell, U.S. Army Colonel Harry Summers, Jr. [later author 
>of
> > >On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War], said to a North
> > >Vietnamese colonel, ‘You know, you never defeated us on the 
>battlefield.'
> > >The Vietnamese colonel replied, ‘That may be so, but it is also
> > >irrelevant.'" '
> > >
> > >People often blame the media for the outcome of the Vietnam War.  Would 
>it
> > >have been right for the media not to cover, for example, the bombing of
> > >Cambodia?  If Americans and Vietnamese had continued to die without 
>news
> > >coverage, would that really have changed the outcome or made what we 
>were
> > >doing right?
> > >
> > >I don't think a lesson we should draw from Tet is that the media should 
>not
> > >cover what is happening.  While I agree that some good things may occur 
>in
> > >Iraq, I think there's a civil war going on.
> > >
> > >Seems to me if you're in the middle of someone else's war, they've got 
>more
> > >to fight for than we do.  And if you're there for the wrong reason, how 
>do
> > >you answer the question 'Why are we there?'  If the question can't be
> > >answered, public support for that war is going to wane.  I don't think 
>that
> > >question could be answered in Vietnam, and it isn't being answered in 
>Iraq
> > >either.
> > >
> > >I don't think we should crap on the troops sent off to war by 
>politicians
> > >and generals.  I think when the politicians and generals send off 
>troops
> > >for no good reason, the leaders deserve to get crapped on.  I think 
>that's
> > >what they did in Vietnam, and again in Iraq.  They put troops in 
>situations
> > >where victory might only be reached at a price that is obscene, and the
> > >troops pay for it first, and then the nation as a whole.  They owe the
> > >people an answer about what they're doing and why.
> > >
> > >Today the question is 'What do we do now?'  I think the only way out is 
>for
> > >us to give up our idea of permanent bases in Iraq, and undo the 
>economic
> > >decisions made by Paul Bremmer.  He privatized the Iraqi economy (such 
>as
> > >it is), basically into our hands.  I think the only way out for us is 
>to
> > >get other nations to join in stabilizing Iraq.  I don't think we can do 
>it
> > >alone, but it may happen if others get involved.   But no one's going 
>to
> > >help if they think it's just going to cement our control over Iraq.  
>Why
> > >would they risk their kids for that?  How would they explain that to 
>their
> > >people?
> > >
> > >Well, I thought that was the question.  I just saw a report that Rice 
>said
> > >the election will not change our objective in Iraq, and that Iraq has 
>to be
> > >successful.  I don't know what that means or how we will get there.
> > >
> > >Anyway, that's my two cents.  Sorry if I rambled.
> > >
> > >Sunil
> > >
> > >
> > >>From: "Matt Decker" <mattd2107 at hotmail.com>
> > >>To: sunilramalingam at hotmail.com, vision2020 at moscow.com
> > >>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Tet Offensive
> > >>Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:47:27 -0800
> > >>
> > >>Sunil,
> > >>
> > >>I would think that the negative media towards our troops and how 
>"they"
> > >>dictate the battlefield would be a start.
> > >>
> > >>Take Care
> > >>Matt
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > >=======================================================
> > >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > >                http://www.fsr.net
> > >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > >=======================================================
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get today's hot entertainment gossip
> > http://movies.msn.com/movies/hotgossip?icid=T002MSN03A07001
> >
> >
> >
>


>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
Try Search Survival Kits: Fix up your home and better handle your cash with 
Live Search! 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmtagline



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list