[Vision2020] Post-Election Etiquette (Molly Ivins)
Tom Hansen
thansen at moscow.com
Thu Nov 9 06:21:17 PST 2006
>From "Creators: A Syndicate of Talent" at www.Creators.com -
--------------------------------------------------------------
POST-ELECTION ETIQUETTE
By Molly Ivins
AUSTIN, Texas -- The sheer pleasure of getting lessons in etiquette from
Karl Rove and the right-wing media passeth all understanding. Ever since
1994, the Republican Party has gone after Democrats with the frenzy of a
foaming mad dog. There was the impeachment of Bill Clinton, not to mention
the trashing of both Clinton and his wife -- accused of everything from
selling drugs to murder -- all orchestrated by that paragon of manners, Tom
DeLay.
Media Matters collected some gems of fairness. For instance, Monica Crowley
with MSNBC, in the wake of John Kerry's botched program, astutely observed
"how lucky we are that he was not elected president. ... The Republicans
remain the grown-ups, the responsible ones on national security."
How many dead Americans has this grown-up war resulted in?
And how darling of Fox's Juan Williams, upon learning polls show the people
favor Democrats on taxes, to say, "To me, that's crazy."
And how many times did Chris Matthews use the Republican talking points
about Nancy Pelosi? Extremist, uncooperative, incapable, unwilling to work
with the president.
So after 12 years of tolerating lying, cheating and corruption, the press is
prepared to lecture Democrats on how to behave with bipartisan manners.
Given Bush's record with the truth, this bipartisanship sounds like a bad
idea on its face. Go back to the first year of the administration, when Bush
double-crossed Ted Kennedy in the No Child Left Behind Act. Think about it:
You've said at the outset of your administration that you need cooperation
to get anything done. Then you double-cross one of the senior senators of
the other party when your re-education and labor agenda is dependent on him?
These people are not only dishonest -- they're not even smart. Not that I
recommend nailing them at every turn, but I wouldn't be surprised if they
try to do it to Democrats. If what Republicans have been practicing is
bipartisanship, West Texas just flooded.
O.K., here's what the D's have going for them. New kids. Easy, popular first
moves -- for example, increasing the minimum wage. Republicans so inept that
it's painful. You want to look at some really, really basic legislation, try
fixing the Medicare prescription drug bill. Or the bankruptcy bill. Or new
dollar and trade policies.
Then we get to the real meat of this election. There are all manner of
shuffle steps and politically shrewd thing for the D's to do. But now is not
the time to be clever. The Democrats won this election because we are
involved in a disastrous war. We know how to do this: Declare victory, and
go home.
I noticed when Republicans are forced to talk about how to end this, they
tend to announce that it's all hopeless: They have no ideas at all. Thanks,
guys. Of all the options, I would say splitting Iraq into three states is
least advisable. First, it puts us in the position of screwing the Kurds
once again. Second, Turkey has serious objections to a Kurdistan. Third,
Turkey is not a militia. Fourth, then you give Iran and Saudi Arabia a pawn
apiece. And there'd be an unimaginable amount of future hassle.
Do I have any good ideas? Yes, but it's not a solution. We need to start the
Middle East peace process again. Because it's the right thing to do. Because
it's what Bush should have done to begin with. Because we have to start
somewhere.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Seeya round twon, Moscow.
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
"Don't Stop Thinking About tomorrow"
http://www.tomandrodna.com/Songs/Dont_Stop.mp3
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list