[Vision2020] Guests or Tenants?

[Tom Hansen]

Applying the quotation marks (") to my statement was merely meant to serve
as my distinction of the two concepts, not to reflect any specific legal
boundary, ok?

 

Although the city code does not (in writing) define a "boarding house", a
session (not that long ago) of the city council verbally defined "boarding
houses".  I could dig through my repository of audio files of City Council
sessions, but I would consider that to be time and effort poorly spent as I
am certain that you can recall these sessions on your own.

 

And lastly, Comb-Over's inappropriateness was apparent in his implication
at:

 

"I'm sure that everyone she recommends will have their conditional use
permits thru the City, approved and paid for - just like every other
international student's host family in Moscow has."

 

Enough said.

 

Tom Hansen

Moscow, Idaho

Intolerista Sergeant-at-Arms

 "Most truths are so naked that people feel sorry for them and cover them
up, at least a little bit."
- Edward R. Murrow

 

  _____  

From: g. crabtree [mailto:jampot at adelphia.net] 
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 7:02 AM
To: Tom Hansen; Vision 2020
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Guests or Tenants?

 

 

After having glanced at the Moscow city code definition of a boarding house,
could you please explain how providing accommodations to guests for a couple
of weeks for compensation fails to meet the afore mentioned definition? Just
exactly where in the code does it distinguish between  a "resident guest"
and a "resident tenant"? And lastly, why would it be "inappropriate
commentary" to discuss this type of topic on Dale's personal blog and yet be
just ducky for you to do the same on your own web site, to which you
thoughtfully provided a link, not to mention here on the V?

 

gc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20061105/ff95d08c/attachment.htm