[Vision2020] Congressional candidates answer questions
Mark Solomon
msolomon at moscow.com
Sat May 6 08:06:43 PDT 2006
This from Randy Stapilus' blog today:
(http://www.ridenbaugh.com/index.php/2006/05/05/choosing-questions/#more-296
)
He reports on answers from candidates for Idaho 1st Cong. District to
a survey jointly sponsored by a coalition of very conservative Idaho
groups. It's a very scary read.
Mark Solomon
********
Choosing questions
by Randy Stapilus
Some states, Washington and Oregon for two, develop statewide and
localized voter guides which include information about the candidates
for office, and information from the candidates - campaign statements
and so on - included as well. They can be helpful assists to voting.
Idaho doesn't have such a publication, but it does have this primary
season something called the Gem State Voter guide, published by a
collection of very conservative groups - Idaho Values Alliance
(conservative Christian, led by Bryan Fischer) , Education Excellence
Idaho (principally backing charter, private and home school options),
Idahoans for Tax Reform (an anti-tax group, led by Laird Maxwell),
This House is My Home (another Maxwell group, aimed at undercutting
land use planning), and Idaho Chooses Life (anti-abortion, led by
David Ripley). Word is that their voter guide will be distributed
through churches and allied organizations around Idaho.
What's interesting in these surveys is both the nature of questions
asked, and who responds, and how.
In this survey - in the range of questions posed to candidates, which
understandably vary somewhat from office to office - some subjects
are addressed in detail, while quite a few other fields are skipped.
You'll not find much here about economic issues (aside from taxes and
property rights), environmental matters (though salmon and dam
breaching are referenced briefly), education, health, law, crime and
the judiciary (except where they touch on sex-related or religious
matters).
What's in? Here are some of the questions posed to candidates for the
Republican nomination for Idaho's 1st U.S. House seat (in the form of
support or oppose the proposition):
Amend U.S. Constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman
Vigorous prosecution of obscenity laws
Ban abortions except to save the life of the mother
Parental consent for underage girls to get an abortion
Woman to receive an ultrasound picture of her unborn baby before
an abortion
Require women to receive thorough information about abortion
risks and development of unborn child before an abortion
Federal ban on all human cloning, including embryonic stem cell research
Return control of education to state and local government
Teach the Bible as literature and history in public schools
Abstinence-only sex education in public schools
Education tax credits to expand parental choice in education
Post Ten Commandments on public property
Impeachment of judges who exceed their Constitutional authority
Protect right of chaplains to pray according to their convictions
Retain "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance
Continue property tax exemption for churches
Continue right of churches to address public policy issues
without losing tax exempt status
Continue right of churches to distribute non-partisan voter guides
Elimination of all budget earmarks
Reduce government spending rather than raise taxes
Reduce welfare programs
Pledge not to raise taxes, fees or rates
Freeze federal spending for non-defense outlays
Simplify the IRS Code with a flat income tax
Social Security choice of investing in individual retirement
accounts for younger workers
Federal Balanced Budget Amendment
"Just compensation" for home and property owners when government
land regulations reduce property values
Allow teaching man is a created being, not an evolved being
Allow teaching Ten Commandments is the foundation of western law
Allow teaching man's law should be consistent with God's law
Allow teaching basic rights are a gift of God, not government
Allow teaching the proper role of government is to protect rights
given to man by God
Legal use of firearms as a defense against criminals, without
fear of being prosecuted or sued
Allow convenience store workers to carry firearms behind the counter
Law-abiding citizen's right to carry a concealed weapon
Of the six candidates for the nomination, Sheila Sorensen and Robert
Vasquez did not respond. (Sorensen presumably figured the crowd that
gets and uses this guide isn't her natural constituency; Vasquez'
reasoning is a little less clear. Nor did most of the few Democrats
cited in the report respond.) The other four - Skip Brandt, Bill
Sali, Norm Semanko and Keith Johnson - all said (according to the
guide) they were in support of every one of the propositions in the
list above.
Realizing that, you might want to review the list above one more time.
All of them also said they were opposed to:
Homosexual adoption of children
Taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood
Physician assisted suicide
Use of eminent domain for economic purposes
"Sexual orientation" language in hate crimes legislation
Casino gambling on Indian lands
Internet gambling
The degree of unanimity on all of these issues, pro and con - a few
these topics may represent broad consensus but most are true hot
buttons - is striking.
The four candidates did split on a few issues. On "Remove
jurisdiction from the U.S. Supreme Court over religious liberty
issues," Brandt said he opposed, Johnson declined to say, and Semanko
and Sali said they were in favor. On "Line item veto for the
president," Brandt said he opposed, Sali was undecided, while Johnson
and Semanko said they were in favor. Interestingly, on "Abolish the
IRS and replace with a national sales tax," Sali was the one
undecided while the other three were in favor.
Still, whatever you conclude from all this, the survey throws a
bright light on these candidates. And suggests some followup
questions, as well, in the short stretch of campaign season remaining.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060506/2ebc2863/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list