[Vision2020] Right Minded

[Ed]

Ms. Mix muses.

Because the notches on my bedpost, pal, record nothing more than "A" grades 
on my English papers and pseudochivalrous men I've used my rhetorical skills 
to dismiss and dispatch.  Believe me, I have no intention of adding you.

What is this? It smells eerily like another rant from our resident feminazi. 
"A" grades on English papers? From someone who hasn't the sense to 
capitalize her first or last name (or, as it now appears, her first name and 
middle and last names combined; duplicity or what?). I'm also guessing that 
her last bit of wisdom (or a pseudotruce of questionable value, or an 
attempt at sarcasm) should, in fact, be two sentences.perhaps I'm wrong.but, 
then again, I don't have a degree in English (but I do advocate "English 
only").

Then, as if keely (Keely) had uttered something of earth-shattering value, 
Chas jumps on her sycophantic bandwagon. I'm concerned how enamored some 
have become over mediocrity, malice, or miscreants. It sounds to me like 
keely (Keely) is a bitter, middle-aged woman. But, I could be wrong.again.

Someone has hijacked the Moscow I once knew. True, it has always been a bit 
more liberal than the rest of the state (well, except Boise); but, when you 
keep pushing the boundaries back, everything become acceptable-to a point 
where nothing is absurd, deviant, or so shocking that we're, well, shocked. 
Idaho's very own enclave I suppose.

Lately, I and others have been accused of being obsessed with homosexuality; 
fortunately, nothing could be further from the truth. As most of you will 
concede, my posts simply opposed same-sex marriage and openly homosexual 
activity. It's my opinion that the more this behavior is glamorized, 
sanitized, and normalized, the more it will become mainstream. This 
phenomenon (of things becoming normal via exposure) happens with literally 
everything new. Nearly this reason alone is justification for opposing it.

Further, most (not all) homosexuals and heterosexuals will agree that the 
optimum family living situation is one where a mother and father are 
present(as was the case some 40 years ago); I think that this is the example 
we should try to show our children. What goes on behind closed doors isn't 
any of my business. I simply feel we should lead by example--show them the 
ideal nuclear family (or a biologically correct family), and let them decide 
on their own what's right or them when they come of age. (Note: I am still 
entitled to an opinion in this area, even if I am divorced.) I feel, 
however, that it's perhaps too late for this. The queer/lesbian/bi crowd is 
increasing exponentially. A quick reference of "Myspace" the other day 
scared the heck out of me. Lesbianism is increasingly en vogue... The 
networks of these people are huge, and with no shame. Britney and Madonna, 
you worthless tramps!! Scarier is the fact that lesbians today are 
shamelessly flaunting their deviant lifestyle unchallenged. In addition, 
what we now see is the "bull dykish" persona (thanks Tony) that we used to 
associate with lesbians has morphed, infiltrating some attractive female 
circles.

So, I think these aforementioned activities are despicable...let it be 
noted. On the other hand, some homos are great people; I know several.. And 
they all know what I think of their choice. All the more reason to pray for 
them.

What else? Hmmm..the Bush bashing. I think my position on this issue is well 
known as well. I don't carry anyone's water, nor am I a Bush sycophant. When 
he's right, I'm with him; when he's wrong, I'm against him. I do think, 
however, that he's a man that tries to do the right thing. I'm not sure how 
truthful he is; only he and God knows. WMD's? Yes, they were there. Both us 
and the British came to similar conclusions after examining the 
evidence...Yes, I read both the CIA report and British Intelligence's 
Agencies a couple years back.

What Bush is doing with the ongoing border disaster is anyone's guess. In my 
opinion, congress should be discussing whether or not to impeach him.  As 
the President of the United States, he is obligated to enforce the laws-or 
to see that they are enforced (in reference to immigration laws). Not only 
has he not accomplished that, he said stated the enforcing the laws are 
impossible. What a lie. Deporting 12 million aliens (more accurate estimates 
at 33 million) is possible.not at once, but systematically.


On May 1, in my town, about 1/5 of our population (1,000 demonstrators) 
marched down main street protesting new immigration laws. They were carrying 
anything from up-side-down American flags, the Caesar Chavez flag, Mexican 
flags, or the organizer-imposed American flag. What a circus. And our 
Keystone Coppish law enforcement wouldn't even allow counterdemonstrations. 
I instead infiltrated the crowd (wearing my "Viva La Deportation" T-shirt 
that many, I'm sure couldn't read) and started some useless dialogue with 
some of the many racist demonstrators. It still baffles me.we allow illegals 
to march (demanding the lawlessness of their homeland) while we (upstanding 
citizens) aren't allowed the same privilege. How blatantly ironic!!!!

Have we become a Nation of masochists?

A day without an immigrant.I say, go for a week, a year, forever.
What would it be like with a day without illegal aliens?
The following is excerpted from http://newswithviews.com/
If illegals represent 12% of the U.S. population, what would happen if they 
boycotted not for a day, but for a decade by leaving our country?
- We would have ~12% more gasoline available in the free market.
- Our highway crowding would alleviate by 20 million people.
- More used automobiles and homes would be for sale, and cheaper.
- Apartment rents would reduce; supply-and-demand.
- Public school overcrowding would diminish by 1.5 million at the very 
least.
- The remaining American students would receive excellent educations in 
English.
--In Colorado, $3,000.000.00 would be saved in one day because illegals 
wouldn't be taping into public services. It varies in each state as to 
numbers of illegals. The savings in ten years would be astronomical.
- Hospital crowding would diminish, and budgets would improve. - The need 
for social-services would diminish by billions of dollars. - Produce-fruit 
prices would increase by 13%. Cheap compared to what taxpayers pay for 
services.
--Crime would drop dramatically and prisons would empty saving billions of 
dollars.
America would not suffer balkanization, language apartheid, cultural 
apartheid, angry non-citizens, chaotic schools and bankrupted hospitals. 
Benefits gained include more jobs for Americans, peaceful communities, less 
drunks on highways, less burglaries, less rapes, greater honesty in 
business, fair wages paid to Americans and SO much more. Let's have illegal 
aliens boycott the USA for a decade. We would all be better off and our 
country would be lawful, peaceful and sustainable.

The noble Representative, Tom Tancredo, added.. (too bad he's one of our 
only sane politicians)..

"The answers-massive drops in crime, in youth gangs, in prison populations, 
in DUI arrests, in the use of emergency rooms, in school enrollments, in the 
number of people without medical insurance, in the number of births in 
California subsidized by the state, in taxes paid to support public 
services-are stunning."


I have to run. You libs have plenty here to chew on for a while. I have a 
Cinco de Mayo celebration to attend...