[Vision2020] Re: Gay marriage...... an oxymoron......

Fri Mar 3 15:44:07 PST 2006

The ethereal Tony writes:

"You are free to emulate behavior you witness at the zoo or in the barnyard, if you insist.  You DON,T (sic) have the right to demand that society give you it's (sic) blessing, however."

Let's see, Tony,

Here are some of the behaviors I have seen from animals and/or fowl on our farm as a youth, in the woods, and at the zoo:

Breathing,
Eating,
Sleeping,
Seeking shelter from the elements,
Protecting assets,
Showing affection,
Having sexual relations,
Raising and nurturing young,
Protecting young,
Educating young,
Having friends,
Playing,
Exhibiting curiosity,
Learning from experience,
Joyfully delighting in existence,
Etc.

I am very sorry for you that you do not think people have a right to do these things.  Yours must be a very pathetic existence.  Perhaps you should take up the accordion.

However, your inapt response above indicates that you might profit from extensive study at:
http://www.readingsuccesslab.com/Reading-Tips/RemedialReading.html

Why?

The context of the thread about "unnatural" was your and Nolan Lynch's asinine assertion that same gender sexual relations were "unnatural" meaning that they did not occur in nature other than among those humans of whom you strongly disapprove (at least out loud, but maybe not in your private fantasies) and whom you shower with your blind invective.

Posters to this thread gave clear and cogent evidence that such a view as you and Lynch expressed about "unnatural" is one of extreme ignorance.  The truth is that same gender sexual relations abound in the animal kingdom including the vertebrates of which you are ostensively a member.

Being shown a fool, you now change your attack, first by exhibiting more extreme ignorance as shown above, and then by disingenuously suggesting that by "unnatural" you really meant "inappropriate."  

Questions:

1.    What the hell does "inappropriate" mean in this context?  

2.    How can one tell if the statement "Same gender sexual relations are inappropriate" is true or false?

Perhaps you can manage answers to these two questions, for once giving answers which are arguments with clear, identifiable, verifiable premises so that a rational discussion can ensue over the truth of those premises and the validity of the structure of the arguments.  

If you can't manage a real argument, than I am afraid I will conclude that you and Lynch are inmates/patients/self-indentured servants of the Wilson & Family's Cult & Cash Machine and most likely on the staff of NSA (No Saints Around).  I have already noticed that your writing exhibits many of the characteristics pointed out by Debi Smith of the fractured writing of NSA Dean Chris Schlect.

If the above sentences are not clear to you, then perhaps help can be found at:
http://www.onelook.com/,  a multiple reference dictionary website.

Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
deco at moscow.com

PS to Matt Decker.  I am way over the so-called posting limit today.  Sorry.  I will make it up to you by not posting during the entire time when next I travel to Yellowknife, NWT, to conduct an autopsy.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: ToeKneeTime at aol.com 
To: deco at moscow.com 
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com 
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Re: Gay marriage...... an oxymoron......

Wayne, 

You are free to emulate behavior you witness at the zoo or in the barnyard, if you insist.  You DON,T have the right to demand that society give you it's blessing, however.

Best,  Tony

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_____________________________________________________
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The ethereal Tony writes:

"You are free to emulate behavior you witness at the zoo or in the barnyard, if you insist.  You DON,T have the right to demand that society give you it's blessing, however."

Let's see, Tony,

Here's some of the behaviors I have seen from animals and fowl on our farm as a youth, in the woods, and at the zoo:

Breathing,
Eating,
Sleeping,
Seeking shelter from the elements,
Protecting assets,
Showing affection,
Having sexual relations,
Raising and nuturing young,
Protecting young,
Educating young,
Playing,
Exhibiting curiosity,
Learning from experience,
Joyfully delighting in existence,
Etc.

I am very sorry for you that you do not think people have a right to do these things.  Yours must be a very pathetic existence.  Perhaps you should take up the accordion.

However, your inapt response above indicates that you might profit from extensive study at:
http://www.readingsuccesslab.com/Reading-Tips/RemedialReading.html

Why?

The context of the thread about "unnatural" was your and Nolan Lynch's asinine assertion that same gender sexual relations were "unnatural" meaning that they did not occur in nature other than among those humans of whom you strongly (at least out loud, but maybe not in your private fantasies) disapprove and who you shower with your blind invective.

Posters on this thread gave clear and cogent evidence that such a view as you and Lynch expressed about "unnatural" is one of extreme ignorance.  The truth is that same gender sexual relations abound in the animal kingdom including the vertebrates o0f which you are ostensively a member.

Being shown a fool, you now change your attack, first by exhibiting more extreme ignorance as shown above, and then by disingenuously suggesting that by "unnatural" you meant "inappropriate."  

Questions:

1.    What the hell does "inappropriate" mean in this context?  

2.    How can one tell if the statement "Same gender sexual relations are inappropriate" is true or false?

Perhaps you can manage answer to the two questions, for once, which are arguments with clear, identifiable, verifiable premises so that a discussion can ensue over the truth of those premises and the validity of the structure of the arguments.  

If you can't manage a real argument, than I am afraid I will conclude that you and Lynch are inmates of the Wilson & Family's Cult & Cash Machine and most likely on the staff of NSA (No Saints Around).

If the above sentence is not clear to you, then perhaps help can be found at:
http://www.onelook.com/,  a multiple reference dictionary website.

Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
deco at moscow.com

PS to Matt Decker.  I am way over the so-called posting limit today.  Sorry.  I will make it up to you by not posting during the entire time when next I travel to Yellowknife, NWT, to conduct another autopsy.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: ToeKneeTime at aol.com 
To: deco at moscow.com 
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com 
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Re: Gay marriage...... an oxymoron......

Wayne, 

You are free to emulate behavior you witness at the zoo or in the barnyard, if you insist.  You DON,T have the right to demand that society give you it's blessing, however.

Best,  Tony

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_____________________________________________________
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060303/ce467987/attachment-0001.htm