[Vision2020] Good sport? No!
Larson Hicks
larsonhicks at gmail.com
Fri Jun 23 15:30:55 PDT 2006
Guys,
I got my letter!! Whew, I was starting to feel left out! So far so good
though, eh? I think Operation Sports Chat is proving to be a real sucess -
I hope Master Wilson is pleased! See you guys at the clubhouse.
Long Live Wilson,
Larson
On 6/23/06, Saundra Lund <sslund at adelphia.net> wrote:
>
> Speaking of pedophiles, Mr. Hicks, when did *you* learn not only that an
> adult predator had abused one of our community's *very* young teen girls
> but
> also that a serial predatory pedophile had operated undetected in our
> community for 18 months?
>
> According to your pastor, the information was available to you sometime in
> late 2005.
>
> If that's the case, I'd like to know what makes you think it proper to
> "infiltrate" V2020 now with all your silly sports posts to try to shift
> attention away from real issues facing our community after you *chose* to
> remain silent while privy to *important* information pertaining to the
> safety of our children, information that was withheld from the vast
> majority
> of our community?
>
> Oh . . . wait . . . I see where you admitted on V2020 to being at a 2005
> HOH
> parish meeting where you were informed.
>
> Then WHAT in God's name is your excuse, Mr. Hicks?
>
> Somehow, I don't think God is going to look too kindly on your strategy of
> obfuscation that harms *all* of God's children. You *knew*, and you said
> nothing . . . did nothing . . . to protect our children. Shame on you,
> Mr.
> Hicks :-(
>
> May God have mercy on your soul.
>
>
> Saundra Lund
> Moscow, ID
>
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
> nothing.
> - Edmund Burke
>
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2006, Saundra Lund.
> Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside the Vision 2020 forum
> without the express written permission of the author.*****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of Larson Hicks
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 11:43 AM
> Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Good sport? No!
>
> Speaking of little men - the draw for Wimbeldon has taken place and it
> looks
> like Federer got a tough one. My question is: Is it worth $19.95 to get
> all-access to the Wimbeldon action on the interweb? I was terribly
> dissappointed that I didn't get to watch any of the French Open and I have
> a
> feeling that Wimbeldon might be Lleyton's chance to dethrone Nadal, which
> would make my month!
>
> This is a serious question, I hope this isn't misconstrued as some sort of
> ploy to distract from Jackie's brilliant and very important concerns about
> the safety of downtowners from all of the drunk fundy-pedophiles that'll
> be
> flooding downtown in a month, or especially from her valuable facial-hair
> commentary.
>
>
> On 6/23/06, J Ford <privatejf32 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Look, little man - I was bringing up concerns that I felt needed
> to
> be
> aired. If you don't have anything valid or contributory to offer,
> why don't
> you just sit down on the big couch in front of the big tv and
> watch
> the big
> game? Or better yet, why don't you go clean out your
> beard.......it
> looks
> more like a food-catch-all than a facial feature to be proud of.
>
> You are not funny and you certainly do not have this community's
> interest in
> mind when you post this kind of clap-trap.
>
> Gabe has made some major errors while being the "security
> coordinator" for
> this event. The concerns of the people involved have been and
> apparently
> will continue to be ignored by him and the rest of the
> "gang". This
> does
> NOT speak well for your organization nor for the "christian" way
> you
> are
> supposed to be operating.
>
> He has less than one month and a few days before this thing
> goes...he has
> YET to even contact the businesses in the CBD, much less
> "coordinate"
> anything that would relay any sense of confidence to the community
> regarding
> it.
>
> I felt his presentation and affect during his talk on Monday as
> well
> as
> other times he has come before a City Committee, was totally
> unprofessional,
> did NOT come across as being confident and lacked a great deal of
> information that could have prevented ANYone from asking questions
> or at
> least fewer ones. I don't see why this type of permit, which
> effects all of
> us TAX PAYING citizens can not be brought before the public and
> our
> input be
> listened to. You don't agree with that - fine.
>
> Don't accuse me of something you have NO knowledge of nor has any
> basis of
> fact to back it up. You don't even know me. (Yes, I know - that
> has never
> stopped you people from being stupid before.)
>
> Now, I am sure there must be something on ESPN you could be
> watching.......................
>
>
> J :]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Taro Tanaka" < taro_tanaka at hotmail.com>
> >To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> >Subject: [Vision2020] Good sport: entertaining J Ford's questions
> with
> >theseriousness they deserve
> >Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:18:10 +0000
> >
> >Let others blather mindlessly about sports. I, for one, shall be
> a
> good
> >sport and entertain J Ford's questions with the seriousness they
> deserve.
> >
> >Question 1: Was he aware of the complaints last year (as he
> specifically
> >stated on Monday) or was he not?
> >
> >Answer 1: That is correct.
> >
> >Question 2: Are they not valid simply because he may not have
> been
> aware
> >of them? He says several time in his statement that he does not
> feel they
> >(the complaints) are valid because he did not know about them
> until
> "they
> >were brought to the table a couple of weeks ago."
> >
> >Answer 2: The bad news is, the statute of limitations has run out
> on last
> >year's complaints. The good news is, there is still plenty of
> time
> to get
> >in your reservations for this year's complaints. Be a good
> citizen!
> --
> >complain early, complain often.
> >
> >Question 3: WHAT account? What does that mean?
> >
> >Answer 3: That "account" means *causality.* You can read it as,
> "I
> assume
> >you want us to have 2 Moscow PC officers *because of* Credenda
> Agenda."
> >
> >Question 4: Why in this world would you "assume" the City
> Council
> wants 2
> >MPD? Assumptions are based on knowledge, to some extent, and so
> I
> am
> >wondering just what his "assume"ing is based upon.
> >
> >Answer 4: No, if assumptions were *based on* knowledge, they
> would
> not be
> >assumptions. Assumptions are things that you simply *asssume* to
> be
> true.
> >Knowledge is based on assumptions (i.e., faith), not the other
> way
> around.
> >
> >Question 5a: Did anyone ask Moscow Hotel if they want *his*
> security
> >guards "permanently" stationed on their steps?
> >
> >Answer 5a: No, but since 9/11 such measures have unfortunately
> become
> >necessary for security. Your kind understanding and cooperation
> are
> greatly
> >appreciated.
> >
> >Question 5b: Since Gabe is denying there was a problem last year
> in
> >regards to the access issue, and he had security guards there
> LAST
> year,
> >what makes it any better this year, to set the situation up the
> same way?
> >
> >Answer 5b: It must be granted that setting the situation up the
> same way as
> >last year does not make it any better this year. It only makes it
> "just as
> >good," which is okay insofar as there was no problem last year.
> >
> >Question 6: Just how many "security guards" will be stationed
> around the
> >play area to guard the children from interacting with people who
> have/will
> >be drinking?
> >
> >Answer 6: This information cannot be divulged for security
> reasons,
> but it
> >will be an adequate number. There are also ample numbers of
> highly
> trained
> >yet fresh reservists that can be called up in the event an
> unexpectedly
> >large number of paedocommunionists show up.
> >
> >Question 7: Just what kind of training or experience will these
> "security
> >guards" have that would enable them to spot a person, much less
> take care
> >of a person, that has partaken a bit too much of what the
> beer/wind
> garden
> >will be offering?
> >
> >Answer 7: This information too cannot be divulged for security
> reasons, but
> >suffice it to say that key personnel in charge of training are
> former
> >members of elite U.S. military special forces drinking teams. A
> few
> country
> >bumpkins, even armed with six-packs of Sam Adams, are no match
> for
> these
> >guys.
> >
> >Question 8: How many drinks will any one person or persons be
> allowed to
> >buy during the evening and who is going to say "enough"?
> >
> >Answer 8: People shall be permitted drinks only up to the limit,
> and not
> >one drink beyond the limit shall be permitted.
> >
> >Question 9: Is there any reason this event could not have been
> held in the
> >East Side Park, where the beer/wind garden could be placed at a
> safer
> >distance from the children's play area?
> >
> >Answer 9: Yes, there is a reason: an increased distance in the
> other
> >location would not be "safer."
> >
> >Question 10: Why is it that this issue is not opened to a public
> hearing
> >so that those with LEGITIMATE concerns can be heard before you
> allow this
> >type of event to be given a green light?
> >
> >Answer 10: Legitimate concerns like the ones you are expressing
> here? To
> >ask the question is to answer it. Why don't you pour yourself a
> stiff drink
> >or three, pop a few Prozacs, and then we can talk when you are no
> longer
> >hyperventilating.
> >
> >Question 11: Why not put out a resolution that any beer/wine
> request for
> >ANY City Park be open to public comment?
> >
> >Answer 11: Do you mind if we offer up libations to the gods while
> we hear
> >these public comments?
> >
> >It seems to me that the added traffic issues, the noise issues
> and
> the
> >possible DWI issues an event like this is likely to create
> dictates
> the
> >public's interests and concerns should be heard by the City
> Council
> before
> >it just grants an event like this "carte blanche."
> >
> >Don't worry, as far as profitless increased traffic and noise
> issues are
> >concerned, your pre-emptive fret-fest already far outstrips
> anything the
> >Trinity Fest itself causes. Keep it up and the Trinity Fest will
> seem staid
> >and quiet by comparison. As for intoxication, I'd like to know
> what
> you've
> >been ingesting that makes your mind produce the above questions.
> You should
> >stay away from controlled substances.
> >
> >-- Princess Sushitushi
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> >http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
> >
> >=====================================================
> >List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the
> >communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >====================================================
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today -
> it's
> FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> <http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/>
>
> =====================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> ====================================================
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060623/c9960c13/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list