[Vision2020] Good sport? No!

Larson Hicks larsonhicks at gmail.com
Fri Jun 23 15:30:55 PDT 2006


Guys,

I got my letter!! Whew, I was starting to feel left out!  So far so good
though, eh?  I think Operation Sports Chat is proving to be a real sucess -
I hope Master Wilson is pleased!  See you guys at the clubhouse.

Long Live Wilson,
Larson

On 6/23/06, Saundra Lund <sslund at adelphia.net> wrote:
>
> Speaking of pedophiles, Mr. Hicks, when did *you* learn not only that an
> adult predator had abused one of our community's *very* young teen girls
> but
> also that a serial predatory pedophile had operated undetected in our
> community for 18 months?
>
> According to your pastor, the information was available to you sometime in
> late 2005.
>
> If that's the case, I'd like to know what makes you think it proper to
> "infiltrate" V2020 now with all your silly sports posts to try to shift
> attention away from real issues facing our community after you *chose* to
> remain silent while privy to *important* information pertaining to the
> safety of our children, information that was withheld from the vast
> majority
> of our community?
>
> Oh . . . wait . . . I see where you admitted on V2020 to being at a 2005
> HOH
> parish meeting where you were informed.
>
> Then WHAT in God's name is your excuse, Mr. Hicks?
>
> Somehow, I don't think God is going to look too kindly on your strategy of
> obfuscation that harms *all* of God's children.  You *knew*, and you said
> nothing . . . did nothing . . . to protect our children.  Shame on you,
> Mr.
> Hicks  :-(
>
> May God have mercy on your soul.
>
>
> Saundra Lund
> Moscow, ID
>
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
> nothing.
> - Edmund Burke
>
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2006, Saundra Lund.
> Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside the Vision 2020 forum
> without the express written permission of the author.*****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of Larson Hicks
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 11:43 AM
> Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Good sport? No!
>
> Speaking of little men - the draw for Wimbeldon has taken place and it
> looks
> like Federer got a tough one.  My question is:  Is it worth $19.95 to get
> all-access to the Wimbeldon action on the interweb?  I was terribly
> dissappointed that I didn't get to watch any of the French Open and I have
> a
> feeling that Wimbeldon might be Lleyton's chance to dethrone Nadal, which
> would make my month!
>
> This is a serious question, I hope this isn't misconstrued as some sort of
> ploy to distract from Jackie's brilliant and very important concerns about
> the safety of downtowners from all of the drunk fundy-pedophiles that'll
> be
> flooding downtown in a month, or especially from her valuable facial-hair
> commentary.
>
>
> On 6/23/06, J Ford <privatejf32 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>         Look, little man - I was bringing up concerns that I felt needed
> to
> be
>         aired.  If you don't have anything valid or contributory to offer,
> why don't
>         you just sit down on the big couch in front of the big tv and
> watch
> the big
>         game?  Or better yet, why don't you go clean out your
> beard.......it
> looks
>         more like a food-catch-all than a facial feature to be proud of.
>
>         You are not funny and you certainly do not have this community's
> interest in
>         mind when you post this kind of clap-trap.
>
>         Gabe has made some major errors while being the "security
> coordinator" for
>         this event.  The concerns of the people involved have been and
> apparently
>         will continue to be ignored by him and the rest of the
> "gang".  This
> does
>         NOT speak well for your organization nor for the "christian" way
> you
> are
>         supposed to be operating.
>
>         He has less than one month and a few days before this thing
> goes...he has
>         YET to even contact the businesses in the CBD, much less
> "coordinate"
>         anything that would relay any sense of confidence to the community
> regarding
>         it.
>
>         I felt his presentation and affect during his talk on Monday as
> well
> as
>         other times he has come before a City Committee, was totally
> unprofessional,
>         did NOT come across as being confident and lacked a great deal of
>         information that could have prevented ANYone from asking questions
> or at
>         least fewer ones.  I don't see why this type of permit, which
> effects all of
>         us TAX PAYING citizens can not be brought before the public and
> our
> input be
>         listened to.  You don't agree with that - fine.
>
>         Don't accuse me of something you have NO knowledge of nor has any
> basis of
>         fact to back it up.  You don't even know me.  (Yes, I know - that
> has never
>         stopped you people from being stupid before.)
>
>         Now, I am sure there must be something on ESPN you could be
>         watching.......................
>
>
>         J  :]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         >From: "Taro Tanaka" < taro_tanaka at hotmail.com>
>         >To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>         >Subject: [Vision2020] Good sport: entertaining J Ford's questions
> with
>         >theseriousness they deserve
>         >Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:18:10 +0000
>         >
>         >Let others blather mindlessly about sports. I, for one, shall be
> a
> good
>         >sport and entertain J Ford's questions with the seriousness they
> deserve.
>         >
>         >Question 1:  Was he aware of the complaints last year (as he
> specifically
>         >stated on Monday) or was he not?
>         >
>         >Answer 1: That is correct.
>         >
>         >Question 2:  Are they not valid simply because he may not have
> been
> aware
>         >of them?  He says several time in his statement that he does not
> feel they
>         >(the complaints) are valid because he did not know about them
> until
> "they
>         >were brought to the table a couple of weeks ago."
>         >
>         >Answer 2: The bad news is, the statute of limitations has run out
> on last
>         >year's complaints. The good news is, there is still plenty of
> time
> to get
>         >in your reservations for this year's complaints. Be a good
> citizen!
> --
>         >complain early, complain often.
>         >
>         >Question 3:  WHAT account?  What does that mean?
>         >
>         >Answer 3: That "account" means *causality.* You can read it as,
> "I
> assume
>         >you want us to have 2 Moscow PC officers *because of* Credenda
> Agenda."
>         >
>         >Question 4:  Why in this world would you "assume" the City
> Council
> wants 2
>         >MPD?  Assumptions are based on knowledge, to some extent, and so
> I
> am
>         >wondering just what his "assume"ing is based upon.
>         >
>         >Answer 4: No, if assumptions were *based on* knowledge, they
> would
> not be
>         >assumptions. Assumptions are things that you simply *asssume* to
> be
> true.
>         >Knowledge is based on assumptions (i.e., faith), not the other
> way
> around.
>         >
>         >Question 5a:  Did anyone ask Moscow Hotel if they want *his*
> security
>         >guards "permanently" stationed on their steps?
>         >
>         >Answer 5a: No, but since 9/11 such measures have unfortunately
> become
>         >necessary for security. Your kind understanding and cooperation
> are
> greatly
>         >appreciated.
>         >
>         >Question 5b:  Since Gabe is denying there was a problem last year
> in
>         >regards to the access issue, and he had security guards there
> LAST
> year,
>         >what makes it any better this year, to set the situation up the
> same way?
>         >
>         >Answer 5b: It must be granted that setting the situation up the
> same way as
>         >last year does not make it any better this year. It only makes it
> "just as
>         >good," which is okay insofar as there was no problem last year.
>         >
>         >Question 6:  Just how many "security guards" will be stationed
> around the
>         >play area to guard the children from interacting with people who
> have/will
>         >be drinking?
>         >
>         >Answer 6: This information cannot be divulged for security
> reasons,
> but it
>         >will be an adequate number. There are also ample numbers of
> highly
> trained
>         >yet fresh reservists that can be called up in the event an
> unexpectedly
>         >large number of paedocommunionists show up.
>         >
>         >Question 7:  Just what kind of training or experience will these
> "security
>         >guards" have that would enable them to spot a person, much less
> take care
>         >of a person, that has partaken a bit too much of what the
> beer/wind
> garden
>         >will be offering?
>         >
>         >Answer 7: This information too cannot be divulged for security
> reasons, but
>         >suffice it to say that key personnel in charge of training are
> former
>         >members of elite U.S. military special forces drinking teams. A
> few
> country
>         >bumpkins, even armed with six-packs of Sam Adams, are no match
> for
> these
>         >guys.
>         >
>         >Question 8:  How many drinks will any one person or persons be
> allowed to
>         >buy during the evening and who is going to say "enough"?
>         >
>         >Answer 8: People shall be permitted drinks only up to the limit,
> and not
>         >one drink beyond the limit shall be permitted.
>         >
>         >Question 9:  Is there any reason this event could not have been
> held in the
>         >East Side Park, where the beer/wind garden could be placed at a
> safer
>         >distance from the children's play area?
>         >
>         >Answer 9: Yes, there is a reason: an increased distance in the
> other
>         >location would not be "safer."
>         >
>         >Question 10:  Why is it that this issue is not opened to a public
> hearing
>         >so that those with LEGITIMATE concerns can be heard before you
> allow this
>         >type of event to be given a green light?
>         >
>         >Answer 10: Legitimate concerns like the ones you are expressing
> here? To
>         >ask the question is to answer it. Why don't you pour yourself a
> stiff drink
>         >or three, pop a few Prozacs, and then we can talk when you are no
> longer
>         >hyperventilating.
>         >
>         >Question 11:  Why not put out a resolution that any beer/wine
> request for
>         >ANY City Park be open to public comment?
>         >
>         >Answer 11: Do you mind if we offer up libations to the gods while
> we hear
>         >these public comments?
>         >
>         >It seems to me that the added traffic issues, the noise issues
> and
> the
>         >possible DWI issues an event like this is likely to create
> dictates
> the
>         >public's interests and concerns should be heard by the City
> Council
> before
>         >it just grants an event like this "carte blanche."
>         >
>         >Don't worry, as far as profitless increased traffic and noise
> issues are
>         >concerned, your pre-emptive fret-fest already far outstrips
> anything the
>         >Trinity Fest itself causes. Keep it up and the Trinity Fest will
> seem staid
>         >and quiet by comparison. As for intoxication, I'd like to know
> what
> you've
>         >been ingesting that makes your mind produce the above questions.
> You should
>         >stay away from controlled substances.
>         >
>         >-- Princess Sushitushi
>         >
>         >_________________________________________________________________
>         >Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
>         >http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>         >
>         >=====================================================
>         >List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the
>         >communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
>         >                              mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>         >====================================================
>
>         _________________________________________________________________
>         Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today -
> it's
> FREE!
>         http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> <http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/>
>
>         =====================================================
>         List services made available by First Step Internet,
>         serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                        http://www.fsr.net
>                   mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>         ====================================================
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060623/c9960c13/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list