[Vision2020] Property tax cut?

Mon Jul 24 23:41:03 PDT 2006

Jackie,

 You seem to know a lot of details about what has been  happening to the Wilson property. You also seem to be overly concerned  about what evidence Wilson has against those who have damaged his  property.  Why is that? 

 I don't think that Wilson is  making this stuff up. Wilson may be a lot of things, but I doubt he is  making up stories about condoms and smeared stuff on his windows. I  mean, come'on. His downtown property has sustained a great deal more  damage then a condom, so the fact that it is now happening to his home  is not that far of a stretch. I also don't think the average person  would call the police if they found a condom on their property. What  are they going to do, dust it for fingerprints, do a DNA test? Maybe he  should have called a Federal Marshall because tampering with a US  mailbox is a federal offensive. 

  _DJA

J Ford <privatejf32 at hotmail.com> wrote:  I hate responding to this, but -

The fact that Dougie did not report this until AFTER the fact, TWO WEEKS 
after they supposedly happened, and that he brought NO evidence, NO proof 
that any of this ever even happened (this has been explained before) and the 
fact that he wrote about it on his blog on 27 July as having reported it to 
the police (when in fact he did NOT) and the very huge fact that NONE of 
those people have the time, inclination or will to do any of this crap - 
THAT is how I know it never happened.

If someone is doing this type of damage, (and that is a HUGE, HUGE IF!!!) 
you'd think Dougie would at LEAST submit the tires and condom for 
examination.  You'd think he'd have the cops COME OUT TO HIS HOUSE TO SEE 
things as they were found.  But he doesn't because IT NEVER HAPPENED and he 
has NOTHING to show.

Questions:  How does Dougie know it was a "fowl smelling substance" that was 
smeared on his living room window?  Did he smell it?  What do "fowl 
substances" smell like, anyway?

What makes you believe Dougie "has all this video recorded"?  And IF he did, 
why is it he has not turned THAT over to the cops?  And WHY in God's name 
would all four of those people make an allegiance and "attack" Dougie's 
home?  That is just such a stupid supposition and both you and Dougie know 
it.  None of those named would even think of doing this kind of juvenile, 
petty, and stupid act(s).

And what is THIS about:  "Also, anyone on his property at the time of the 
crimes can snap a picture
on their cell phone and send it to an email account for just 25 cents."?  
What has that got to do with anything?

Filing a false police report is illegal - but then, Dougie is very used to 
doing things irregardless to the law.  I just get sick of this town allowing 
him to get away with it.

Merde.

J  :]

>From: Donovan Arnold 
>To: "g. crabtree" , J Ford 
,  
>vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Property tax cut?
>Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>"Dougie, on the other hand, has NO proof, NO evidence, NO witnesses,
>NO real reason to have named four 35-50(+) year old people as doing what
>amounts to teen-type of pranks in a police report TWO WEEKS after he says 
>they
>occurred and AFTER he says he reported them." --JFord
>
>J, How do you KNOW this for fact unless you are monitoring his
>property 24 hours a day? I think Doug Wilson has all this video recorded.
>You can buy a home video recording system now for less than $100.
>Also, anyone on his property at the time of the crimes can snap a picture
>on their cell phone and send it to an email account for just
>25 cents. I think Wilson could afford both.
>
>I want the people to be caught. Anyone who vandalizes is a menace and a 
>coward, regardless
>of who it is and who they are doing it to. I hate it when people mess with 
>my
>stuff. If they have an issue with me, take it up with me, not my property. 
>Vandals
>raise our taxes through law enforcement, and our insurance rates.
>
>Nails in a vehicle tire is also more than a teenage prank. It is very 
>DANGEROUS and could
>seriously injury or kill somebody if a tire blows out on a highway.
>
>_DJA
>
>
>
>
>
>"g. crabtree"  wrote:  Rather then take any of the 
>silliness that has been liberally ladled out
>here in the past few postings at face value, I hauled my lard out into the
>warm summer sunshine and down to the MPD to ask some extremely helpful and
>patient people some rather dull questions. Here are some of the results of
>my queries.
>
>First, there are five officers on duty for the day shift and the swing
>shift. There are three officers on duty for the graveyard shift. Due to the
>way shifts overlap there is only a four hour block where there is only 
>three
>officers on patrol. (generally the quietest portion of any of the shifts)
>The assertion that during the busiest shift there are only two officers
>working is hogwash. Period.
>
>Second, all officers accrue vacation time at the same rate as other city
>employees and the staffing is such that the officers who desire to do so,
>get to take it. Nobody is not allowed to take their vacation time because 
>of
>short staffing.
>
>Third, all officers work approximately a 40 hr. week. Guys on the swing and
>graveyard shifts do sometimes rack up some overtime due to the nature of
>their shift. Also overtime is put in for special events (games, rendezvous,
>renaissance fair, etc.) this is widely regarded as a good thing by the
>officers. Time off appears to be the last thing these people want.
>
>Fourth, response time in Moscow is lightning fast for emergency calls. In a
>situation where harm might befall a citizen, the police drop everything and
>respond right now. Matters of lesser urgency do take a back seat but I was
>assured that all calls are responded to within 30 min. unless other
>arrangements are made with the reporting party.
>
>Fifth, there is no reason that people shouldn't know about what's going on
>in there neighborhood. The link that Dan C. provided gives one access to 
>the
>police log and from that it's child's play to know exactly what's up around
>your home. No need to wait to hear it third, fourth, or fifth hand.
>
>Sixth, when extra patrol is requested at any given location it means that
>the police will drive by a little more often then they might have 
>otherwise.
>It does not mean that they will be parked in that persons driveway keeping
>their mailbox safe from a spent French letter. Sorry, hansen.
>
>Finally, the officer that I was speaking with did allow as how having a
>couple of extra personnel for the day shift would help to keep the 
>paperwork
>from piling up and create a little less of a burden for the rest of the 
>guys
>but absolutely nothing was mentioned that led me to think that from a 
>safety
>(ours or the officers) point of view, these folks didn't have it completely
>under control. Now hows about a little sanity be allowed to enter into this
>discussion, allrighty?
>
>G. Crabtree
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "J Ford"
>
>To:
>Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 12:35 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Property tax cut?
>
>
> > Did you happen to look at those reports or are you just trying to make a
> > sick point?  Do you happen to know WHO made those calls in that you
> > referred
> > to?  Was it the same person or many people?  There are LOT of addresses 
>on
> > that or any street.  How about the fact that a LOT of time is being 
>spent
> > by
> > the cops on A street, First, Main, Third, Lilly, West Pullman, etc.  So,
> > what exactly do you think?  That everyone that repeatedly calls in for
> > those
> > above-mentioned streets, are making false police reports?  That they are
> > abusing the system?  Don't think so.
> >
> > Dougie, on the other hand, has NO proof, NO evidence, NO witnesses, NO
> > real
> > reason to have named four 35-50(+) year old people as doing what amounts
> > to
> > teen-type of pranks in a police report TWO WEEKS after he says they
> > occurred
> > and AFTER he says he reported them.  There are now four citizens who 
>have
> > "police records" because one sick guy decides to play wounded and make
> > false
> > accusations.  THAT is a waste of cop-man-power and an ABUSE of the legal
> > system.  He has many, many boys that he could enlist the aide of to 
>watch
> > his home....believe me, the neighbors watch it enough and they have NOT
> > seen
> > any of this kind of stuff happening to him.
> >
> > And why don't you try talking to the cops.  They have two people working
> > DAY-TIME hours, during the busiest part of the day and there are times
> > when
> > that is all they have during the night.  Don't know where you live 
>(don't
> > wanna) but there are sirens going off at all times of the day and night
> > and
> > the cops are going from one of end town to another all the time; and 
>they
> > are trying to get to all the calls they need to in the time they need 
>to.
> >
> > Why is it that some people are so quick to increase the City personnel,
> > but
> > they leave the cops and fire personnel hanging?  Like they aren't
> > important
> > enough to warrant more trained bodies?  But an office needs a secretary?
> > Please.  Get your own darn coffee.  But put more cops on the road,
> > increase
> > their pay/benefits and allow them the union.
> >
> > J  :]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>From: "Dan Carscallen"
> >>To:
> >>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Property tax cut?
> >>Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:58:27 -0700
> >>
> >>Tom says:
> >>". . . two cops on duty at any given time in a town of 20,000 . . . And
> >>one of them is now required to use a portion of that valuable time
> >>providing security to 1150 North Polk Extension?"
> >>
> >>Just a quick glance at the pole-leece's page
> >>(http://www.ci.moscow.id.us/police/) and their daily activity log (check
> >>the menu on the left), it looks like the cops are spending a lot of time
> >>around the 800 block of North Garfield.  Maybe some 'higher-up" in the
> >>Kirk lives there too?  I would venture to guess that it's all kinds of
> >>people "abusing" our police force, CC and non-CC alike.
> >>
> >>And I would also venture to guess that the "two cops on duty" is during
> >>the slow hours.
> >>
> >>But that's just me, doing all kinds of venturing,
> >>
> >>DC
> >>
> >>
> >>=====================================================
> >>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >>                http://www.fsr.net
> >>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >>====================================================
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's 
>FREE!
> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
> > =====================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >               http://www.fsr.net
> >          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > ====================================================
> >
>
>
>=====================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>====================================================
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>  Next-gen email? Have it all with the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to 
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

=====================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
====================================================

---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1&cent;/min.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060724/0a96a7dd/attachment-0001.htm 