[Vision2020] City Council and the Pledge

[Phil Nisbet]

Nancy

Just for the sake of the public's right to know, which council members 
exactly felt that the Pledge should not be offered?  Not to question their 
feelings or their sincerity, I just think that the public has a right to 
know who exactly among the council feels that the pledge does not belong. 
Then I would ask, did the council vote on removal of the pledge and how was 
the agenda changed to reflect the change from former procedure?

I guess what I am wondering here is if this is an issue for some particular 
reason.  Does one or more of the council members feel that they can not 
partake in the Pledge of Allegiance due to some specific detail contained in 
the pledge?  Has the whole council decided to alter its conduct to 
accommodate this concern of the few who have a problem?

I mean for all I know the reason somebody does not want to take the pledge 
is because they disagree with the statement "liberty and justice for all".  
Knowing that the council is not loaded down with people who oppose our 
Republican form of government would be nice.  So what’s the beef that the 
few have with the Pledge?

Phil Nisbet



>From: "Nancy Chaney" <nchaney at moscow.com>
>To: "'Donovan Arnold'" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>,        "'Area Man 
>(Dan C)'" <areaman at moscow.com>, <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] City Council and the Pledge
>Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:12:49 -0800
>
>Donovan, just so you’ll know, Dan’s V2020 opener about “…humanness” was
>the end of my reading of a quote from Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in
>acknowledgement of his birthday and in support of human rights. In its
>entirety, it says: “We must work unceasingly to uplift this nation that
>we love to a higher plateau of compassion, to a more noble expression of
>humanness.” In my book, that also speaks to loyalty to country.
>
>I acknowledge that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance is a big deal to
>many people. I would argue that contemplating the true meanings of those
>words is a bigger deal. Whatever their personal reasons, I believe that
>City Council members who asked that we not include the Pledge, are
>honorable and sincerely driven to serve this community.
>
>I get shivers when the flag goes by, but I appreciate that loving the
>foundations and people of ones Country is distinct from being made to
>say particular words before each Council meeting. Please be aware that
>upon being sworn in, local elected officials sign an oath to “support
>the Constitution of the United States and the State of Idaho, and the
>Laws and Ordinances of the City of Moscow, and …to the best of (his/her)
>ability, faithfully perform the duties of the office…” I am confident
>that we all took that oath very seriously and considered the meaning of
>every word and our ability to abide by them in good conscience. Thank
>you for being concerned.
>
>Nancy Chaney
>-----Original Message-----
>From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
>[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Donovan Arnold
>Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:10 PM
>To: Area Man (Dan C); vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] City Council and the Pledge
>
>Dan,
>
>Thanks for bringing this up. I think any person who cannot show a
>loyalty to the United States over other nations has no business being in
>an elected office in the United States.
>
>I think the people in any city, county, state, or country deserve, at
>minimum, the knowledge that their elected leaders are on their team. If
>an elected leader cannot say, "Yes, I affirm my allegiance to this
>country, state, county, and city FIRST.", I think that disqualifies them
>from the position. Saying, "I am for Humans" just does not cut it for
>me.
>
>-DJA
>
>
>"Area Man (Dan C)" <areaman at moscow.com> wrote:
>Members of the Vizzz,
>
>I was perusing the agenda for the last city council meeting and noticed
>the Pledge of Allegiance was no longer an agenda item. I could not
>attend the meet! ing since my delicate flower was working basketball
>games
>(Go Bears!) and someone had to stay home and make sure the kids couldn't
>escape from their restraints (yes, I'm being facetious).
>
>I listened to the city's recording of the council meeting, but the
>recording starts with Mayor Chaney saying: " . . . expression of
>humanness. With that we'll call the meeting to order." Then they move
>into the consent agenda and public comment period.
>
>Does the council no longer begin meetings with the Pledge, or was it
>just not recorded? If the council no longer begins with the Pledge, why
>not?
>
>curiosity's killin' me, and I ain't no cat,
>
>DC
>
>_____________________________________________________
>List services made available by First Step Internet,
>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>http://www.fsr.net
>mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>
>   _____
>
>Yahoo! Photos
>Ring in the New Year with Photo
><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/photos/*http:/pa.yahoo.com/*htt
>p:/us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/photos/evt=38087/*http:/pg.photos.ya
>hoo.com/ph/page?.file=calendar_splash.html&.dir=>  Calendars. Add
>photos, events, holidays, whatever.


>_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/