[Spam] RE: [Vision2020] fleecing of Moscow???

[Shelly]

Please see below: 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: keely emerinemix
Date: 01/09/06 20:34:39
To: CJs at turbonet.com; vision2020 at moscow.com; shawnc at outtrack.com
Subject: [Spam] RE: [Vision2020] fleecing of Moscow???
 
Phil,
 
The bond failed.
-Reread my statement. What's up with you guys? I said, "the last bond THAT
DID PASS."
 
Dr. Donicht didn't lie.
-Keely, it was proven in the newspaper. I am going to make sure no one
forgets. I am still waiting for the Daily News to get it together.
 
There is no fraud.
-I would not call it fraud. I would call it "misleading."

 Raises and other contract language are negotiated between the Board of
Trustees negotiators and the MEA's negotiators.
-Is it true then? You do say you are on the board of trustee's. Correct?

I am not a negotiator.
-But you are on the board of trustees? I am lost. 

I am proud to work with the negotiators on other board issues.
-So you had influence over the raises? Please explain.

 Bond money can't fund raises.
-How did Candice pull it off. Please explain.
 
Operating budget can't fund bonds.
-The last bond THAT PASSED, I want to know EXACTLY how it was broke down and
where the money went. 

We have covered all of this before.
-Have we?
 
I'm done.
-I'm not!
 
keely
-Phil
 
 
 
 
 
 
From: "Shelly" <CJs at turbonet.com>
To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>, <shawnc at outtrack.com>
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] fleecing of Moscow???
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:05:40 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
 
  Shawn,
 
Please reread my statement. It says, in a questionable form, "did I hear
right? Our school administrators and teachers all got better than a 4%
raise?" I was asking a question. Did they? I never said the 4% elleged raise
came out of the building fund.
 
My next question for you, if your statement is factual, how did Candice
Donicht promise if her Bond would pass that not one dime would go to the
teachers in raises. And administration. But immediately after that Bond
passed everybody got raises. In my book that is a falsehood.
 
Phil Roderick
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Shawn Clabough
Date: 01/09/06 18:43:13
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] fleecing of Moscow???
 
Is this aimed at the state administration, where it rightfully should be?
Local administrators do not have the flexibility to move monies earmarked
for salaries to building maintenance and vice versa.  Also, your statement
“Our school administrators and teachers all got better than a 4% raise” is
not completely accurate.
Shawn
 
 
 
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Shelly
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 12:11 PM
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] fleecing of Moscow???
 
Did I hear right? Our school administrators and teachers all got better than
a 4% raise? Yet our schools continue to deteriorate? I also understand there
is something like 15 million dollars in trust. Wait, did I use the right
word, trust???????? Is this BEFORE or AFTER the raises? Why does this keep
happening with the same administration?
 
Phil Roderick
 
 
 
 
 
 
_____________________________________________________
  List services made available by First Step Internet,
  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                http://www.fsr.net
           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
 
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
 
 
 
--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date: 7/8/2005
 
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060110/ef810960/attachment.htm