[Vision2020] Lies, Ports, and Studity

[Joan Opyr]

Area Man Dan asks:

"Where was all the bruhaha when the ports were taken over by a British 
conglomerate? I seem to recall them invading us almost 200 years ago, 
about 30 years after we kicked them out of the country."

If this were 200 years ago (and assuming we'd all been transported back in 
time with our iPods and such), I suppose we wouldn't have entrusted any of 
our ports to the British, them being anti-American limeys and all. But, 
it's 2006, and George W. Bush (not King George III) announced some four 
plus years ago that we would have no truck with terrorists or the 
countries that harbor, fund, and sponsor terrorists. 

The United Arab Emirates harbored and sponsored Mohammed Atta, the 
purported organizer of the September 11th attacks, and Zacharias Al 
Moussaui. The United Arab Emirates was the last country in the world to 
allow flights into and out of Afghanistan after the rest of the world 
(including Saudi Arabia) had finally agreed to isolate the Taliban.  Last 
but not least, why couldn't the Clinton Administration "take out" Osama 
bin Laden in late 1999 when U. S. intelligence finally pinpointed his 
location inside Afghanistan? Because they would have taken out half of the 
royal family of the UAE in the process; it would seem that their royal 
highnesses, the dictators of the UAE, were frequent and welcome guests of 
Osama bin Laden.

This port deal stinks to high heaven. And what's the whiffiest bit? The 
Carlyle Group's involvement. Here's a piece of trivia for you -- where was 
George H. W. Bush on September 11th, 2001? Meeting with the Carlyle Group, 
which at that time included Osama bin Laden's brother.

Show me the money!

Joan "Grassy Knoll" Opyr/Auntie Establishment
www.joanopyr.com


---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
           http://www.fsr.com/