[Vision2020] Repentant Sinner my ass!

[J Ford]

Question:

Has this "women" sued Clinton yet?  If not, why?  If this was such a crime 
or assault against her, why hasn't she taken the legal remedies available to 
her?

Or is making the big bucks off all the tv spots and being able to start her 
own business distracting to her?

Sorry, but I have very little compassion for this women.  While she was an 
"underling", she was also a crafty one that seemingly planned her moves even 
to the point of telling her "girlfriend" about it and hiding the dress in 
question for future use.  And surely, there must have been other dresses or 
outfits that she wore that were put away, just in case.

Seems to me, both these people knew exactly what they were doing, where, 
when and what ramifications those actions held.

Now how about moving onto to something a little more relevant to time and 
place?


J  :]





>From: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
>To: "'g. crabtree'" <jampot at adelphia.net>,        "'Paul Rumelhart'" 
><godshatter at yahoo.com>, <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Repentant Sinner my ass!
>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:59:46 -0800
>
>The sexual relationship between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky was a
>consensual one between two adults.  Impeachment proceedings were initiated
>against Bill Clinton for having lied to congress about his sexual relations
>with Monica Lewinsky.  The impeachment processes were not concerned with 
>the
>acts themselves.
>
>
>
>Mr. Crabtree's inference that "the tryst between a collage professor and a
>student is not [consensual]" has me confused.  It isn't so much the matter
>concerning consent that suggests such a tryst is unethical.  A college
>professor is in a position of trust over his/her students.  Such a tryst is
>considered to be an abhorrent violation of that trust.
>
>
>
>Concerning age of majority:  Each state establishes their own respective 
>age
>of majority (adulthood).  At the age of 23, Monica Lewinsky is considered 
>an
>adult in each and every state of the union.  The only way that Ms. Lewinsky
>would be considered a victim in this matter is if she were diagnosed as
>mentally unstable.  Since both Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky were of
>adult age, the disparity in their ages is moot.
>
>
>
>In my opinion, Monica Lewinsky knowingly and willingly had sexual relations
>with Bill Clinton, knowing him to be married and President of the United
>States.  Either of the two latter characteristics is likely to increase her
>bank book balance when heavily seasoned with extortion.  My guess is that
>knowledge of the Clinton/Lewinsky tryst was slowly approaching the "light 
>of
>day".  President Clinton had two choices:  Either pay off Ms. Lewinsky with
>hush money or deny that the tryst ever happened.
>
>
>
>Enter Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr . . . and the rest of the story.
>
>
>
>Tom Hansen
>
>Moscow, Idaho
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
>On Behalf Of g. crabtree
>Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 6:19 PM
>To: Paul Rumelhart; vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Repentant Sinner my ass!
>
>
>
>Why is the relationship between former President Clinton and Ms. Lewinski
>"consensual" when the tryst between a collage professor and a student is
>not? A boss and an underling? A guard and a prisoner? I was of the
>impression that any time there was such a huge disparity between the status
>of two people with regard to their stations in life that the concept of
>"consent" became at best vague and at worst unattainable. What divide could
>be greater than the gulf between a 23 year old naif and the nearly twice 
>her
>age leader of the free world? I would content that the gulf between them 
>far
>exceeds that of the rift between a 17 year old girl and her 21 year old boy
>friend and we all know where that lack of restraint leads. While the actual
>acts that occurred in and near the oval office may have been technically
>legal, there is no doubt that the concept of abuse is not out of the
>question. What is also certain is that it was an absurdly ill considered,
>vulgar, and characterless move on the part of someone who might reasonably
>have been expected to know better, even by liberal democrats. I very much
>agree with Tony in that when Ms. Lewinski looks back on this glittering
>moment in the spotlight it won't be with pride.
>
>
>
>g
>


>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.  Get a free 90-day trial! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000002msn/direct/01/?href=http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.windowsonecare.com/?sc_cid=msn_hotmail