[Vision2020] Your Baptism "i Faderens og Sønne ns og den Helligaands Navn"

[debismith at moscow.com]

It must be interesting to have a direct line into the Mind of God, as Doug F. appears to have. 
Perhaps that is what fried his brain, requiring the transplant? I always understood God had to 
appear as a burning bush, a voice from the clouds, or have an angel as a surrogate messenger 
to keep the recipient of His Word safe from the Glory...but then, again, I'm not a Biblical 
scholar or even a Mythology scholar. Perhaps those of you (and I am in awe of you) with those 
credentials could help me understand how Lameno Doug might survive such an intimate 
contact with the Lord? Or is he just projecting? Or is he just ridiculous?

Having been baptised at age eight, supposedly voluntarily, does not make me a current 
member of the LDS faith. I think most people make choices in our spirituality based (to varying 
degrees) on experience, need, mindfullness and the influence or force of others. Perhaps Doug 
F. sprang from the womb (or the thigh of his god) fully spiritually formed and never asked 
questions? How nice for him! No questions, no doubts, no deep thought. No brain, no pain. 
Being in direct contact with the god one projects means never having to be responsible....
Debi R-S

To:             	vision2020 at moscow.com, nielsen at uidaho.edu, nickgier at adelphia.net
Date sent:      	Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:57:01 -0500
From:           	heirdoug at netscape.net
Subject:        	[Vision2020]   Your Baptism "i Faderens og Sønne
	ns og den Helligaands Navn"

[ Double-click this line for list subscription options ] 

Ralph and Nick,

You are so good to try and point everything back to scripture, can you
show me from scripture where Baptism "i Faderens og Sønnens og den
Helligaands Navn" can ware off or has no effect? It doesn't matter
what you think your Baptism means, what does God think about your
Baptism?

Doug






-----Original Message-----
From: nielsen at uidaho.edu
Cc: heirdoug at netscape.net
Sent: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 5:31 PM
Subject: Heirdoug's hero

heirdoug at netscape.net
Thu Dec 7 12:06:01 PST 2006

DOUG
Yes, I do claim that the genealogy in Matthew is the Word of God and
is true. I also claim that the genealogy in Luke is also the Word of
God and is true. To believe that any part of God's Word to be false is
to blaspheme the living God, something that you and your so called
"honest scholars" have come to a consensus on.

RALPH
I have a feeling that Doug is hiding something here. Both genealogies,
in Matthew and Luke, are of Jesus via Joseph. But they can't both be
true, so fundies play the dishonest game of pretending that the one in
Luke is of Mary, not Joseph. But some other fundies make believe that
the one in Matthew is of Mary and the one in Luke is of Joseph. Is
someone blaspheming the living God?

DOUG
I don't agree with you that neither David nor his baby went to heaven.
To quote David, "Can I bring him back again? I will go to him, but he
will not return to me." David went to his resurrection and as an Old
Testament saint, is in the presence of the Lord. David said "I will go
to him" that would mean that the baby went to his resurrection and is
in the presence of the Lord as well. Ralph, you are starting to sound
like a Sadducee.

RALPH
Doug can't show us a single person in the entire Hebrew Bible (OT) who
died and went to heaven. The conservative Sadducees were correct in
this matter.

DOUG
Vicarious punishment is perfectly moral in these Bible days as well.
We have never left the Bible days. The judgments and blessings of God
do not change for God is unchangeable.

RALPH
We'll see how far you can carry the argument that the God of the Bible
is unchangeable. In the beginning of biblical human history Yahweh God
told Adam and Eve, "By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread
until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; you are
dust, and to dust you will return" (Genesis 3:19). And to make sure
that Adam and Eve would not be able to return to the garden of Eden,
eat of the tree of life, and live forever like God, he drove them out
of the garden and placed cherubim to guard the way to the tree of life
(Genesis 3:22-24).

DOUG
The sins that you commit could be
the judgment God is placing upon your Grand parents. Not having a name
or posterity to carry it on is also God’s judgment.

RALPH
Now Doug is twisting the word of God. It could be that I am paying
God's penalty for something my great-grandparents did, but nowhere in
the Bible have I read that sins that I might commit are the penalty
for what they did. For a summary of how God runs his world read
Deuteronomy 28. Nowhere does God promise any kind of life after death,
either for reward in a heaven or punishment in a hell. As the Preacher
wrote in the word of God, "The living know that they will die, but the
dead know nothing; they have no more reward, and even the memory of
them is lost" (Ecclesiastes 9:5).

DOUG
Ralph you amaze me. You choose to speak the truth in the midst of your
lies. When God arranged, at the beginning of time, to have his only
begotten son crucified, in the fullness of time, He was only thinking
of you. It was for your sins that Jesus was born. It was for your sins
that He lived a sinless life. It was for your sins that He died and
was buried. And it was for your justification that He was raised from
the dead on the third day.

RALPH
It would be nice if Doug would tell us what lies I have told. I am
curious to know. As for vicarious punishment, we read, "But he [David]
did not put to death the children of the murderers; according to what
is written in the book of the law of Moses, where the LORD commanded,
'The parents shall not be put to death for the children, or the
children be put to death for the parents; but all shall be put to
death for their own sins'" (2 Kings 14:6). (That was a long verse,
Doug.)

DOUG
I am curious about one thing. Were you baptized in the name of the
Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit as a child like Nick Gier was?

RALPH
Yes, I was baptized into the Church of Denmark, like Nick's daughter,
"i Faderens og Sønnens og den Helligaands Navn." But it wore off.


From: nielsen at uidaho.edu
To: Vision2020 at moscow.com

Sent: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:46 AM
Subject: Heirdoug's hero

If Doug's claim that the genealogy in Matthew is historically true,
then the one in Luke is false. Of course, it is possible that both are
false, as honest Christian scholars agree.

I am at a loss to understand what Doug means when he claims that I
"typically" quote Bible verses incompletely. Since the division of the
Bible into chapters and verses is quite arbitrary--they do not appear
in the MSS--it is not always necessary to quote verses in full. Since
I was discussing David, not Jesus, my omission was perfectly
legitimate.

I take it that Doug agrees with me that neither David nor his baby boy
went to heaven when they died.

Vicarious punishment was considered perfectly moral in Bible days.
That is why the LORD killed David's baby boy for his father's sins.
And that is why, according to the Christian religion, God arranged to
have his own son tortured and killed for the sins of others.

As for which or how many books belong in the Bible and thus constitute
the "Word of God," here again the decision is quite arbitrary. To this
day Christians and Jews cannot agree on this matter. So far be it from
me to argue about it.

Ralph
 =
______________________________________________________________________
__ Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.

=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================



-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.0/524 - Release Date:
11/8/06 1:40 PM