[Vision2020] stop the false accusations against Sunil

Joe Campbell joekc at adelphia.net
Tue Aug 22 10:55:48 PDT 2006


Tony,

It is one thing to call Sunil offensive names and accuse him of being an elitist. The first is just childish and the second merely indicates that you just don't know Sunil. Both of these sorts of things only make me laugh.

But in our contemporary context it is just plain irresponsible and wrong to suggest in anyway that Sunil is a supporter of terrorism. Both you and Donovan have made this absurd accusation -- neither one of you even attempting to support the claim in any way. You need to get a grip.

I hope that others will join me in condemning these kinds of accusations. 

--
Joe Campbell

---- Tony Simpson <tonytime at clearwire.net> wrote: 

=============
Suenil: Yep pal, I need to go and "oppress someone."

Anyone who supports terrorists instead of his own country I will oppress. 
Anyone who revels in rubbing everyone else's nose in his supposed 
intellectual superiority I will oppress.  Anyone who sees no injustice in 
the premeditated murder of the innocent, I will oppress.  Anyone who tries 
to deny freedom of expression to those with whom they disagree, I will 
oppress.  Anyone who wishes to weaken or destroy the institutions that have 
held civilization together, I will oppress.

So get used to it Lawyer Man, I'm not going anywhere.

Despising arrogant and smug elitists, --TONY
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Celebrate freedom


> Tony,
>
> You're the one who brings up my law degree,  not me.  Since you inquired
> about how I passed the bar, I thought I'd answer you.
>
> If you're well-informed, Tony, you're hiding your light under a bushel. 
> Now
> I'll get out of your hair; you probably need to go oppress someone.
>
> Sunil
>
>
>>From: "Tony Simpson" <tonytime at clearwire.net>
>>To: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>>CC: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Celebrate freedom
>>Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:02:33 -0700
>>
>>Sunil,
>>
>>Me mistaking myself for your wife?  I'm afraid I have absolutely no idea
>>what you are talking about.  But pal, that equation would NEVER work out
>>THAT way.  The reason for the "hon" comment is old news, weren't you 
>>paying
>>attention councilor?
>>
>>Ya' know, Your fancy pants law degree really doesn't mean SHIT to me,
>>Sunil. Abraham Lincoln had no formal schooling yet he was as brilliant and
>>persuasive as any "credentialed" man of his time.  As it is with you and 
>>I.
>>We are both very well informed, just not necessarily in the same exact
>>areas.  You could really do with a dose of humility, Mr. Constitutional 
>>law
>>hotshot.
>>
>>Now go sue somebody or something.....       -Tony
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Sunil Ramalingam"
>><sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>>Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8:36 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Celebrate freedom
>>
>>
>>>For someone who comes across as a homophobe, Tony, it's odd to find you
>>>mistaking yourself for my wife.  However, it prepared me for finding your
>>>response to Andreas and your use of the endearment, 'Hon,' for him.  Hey,
>>>not that there's anything wrong with it, but does his wife know about
>>>this?
>>>
>>>But since you're neither she nor the boss of me, I guess I'm allowed to
>>>change the subject.
>>>
>>>I will give you one clue about how I passed the bar exam, since you
>>>brought
>>>it up:  On the Constitutional law section, I discussed the established 
>>>law
>>>of the United States, not the imagined law and jurisprudence of Tony
>>>Simpson.  Until you're the Fuhrer, I will recommend this approach to 
>>>those
>>>preparing for that exam.
>>>
>>>I understand that you oppose flag burning.  That puts you with almost the
>>>entire population of the United States, since this hardly ever happens.
>>>I've never seen it in person; have you?  But saying it's not speech does
>>>not
>>>make you right, even if you say it in multiple posts.  It's also pretty
>>>ineffective speech, but speech it still is.
>>>
>>>Sunil
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: "Tony Simpson" <tonytime at clearwire.net>
>>>>To: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>>>>CC: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>>>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Celebrate freedom
>>>>Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:29:17 -0700
>>>>
>>>>Sunil,
>>>>
>>>>No, you are not going to be allowed to change the subject.  Address my
>>>>point about the difference between license and freedom.
>>>>
>>>>Standing in opposition to double talking lawyers,  --Tony
>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Sunil Ramalingam"
>>>><sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>>>>Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>>>Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 9:44 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Celebrate freedom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>=======================================================
>>>List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>>               http://www.fsr.net
>>>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>=======================================================
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
> 


=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list