[Vision2020] Re: Baby's coo for a cold and distant Nick........
joekc at adelphia.net
joekc at adelphia.net
Mon Apr 17 21:17:08 PDT 2006
I always gave you the benefit of doubt until I read your very first words.
Nick told you that he did not want to be called 'Prof.,' etc. yet you continue to annoy him with this label. What is the point of this usage if not to harass?
---- ToeKneeTime at aol.com wrote:
I had you pegged as a pretty grounded thinker until your last message. I
gotta' admit that your wistful tale of angst ridden apes and composing whales
was waaay over the top. Apes are people now? Prof, I think you need to ease
up on the caffeine after lunch. Look, it's not nearly as complicated a
proposition as you find it. You see, human beings are human beings. According to
our declaration of Independence, they have an unalienable right to life.
When a boy human and a girl human conceive a third being, it is a human being.
Now then, this third human therefore has an unalienable right to life.
Easy. And it probably won't even be on the test. Monkeys are not human, they
are monkeys. Whales are not human, they are whales, etc.
If you wish to refer to select humans of your choosing as persons and then
conclude that they should be summarily executed, fine. But don't expect to
find a seat at the table in civilized company.
It is not your LOGIC that I find strict and cold, Nick. I'm every bit as
logical. What I find disconcerting is how your logic seams to be unaccompanied
by any empathy or conscience. A whale is a monkey is a rat is a pig is a
boy, right Teach?
You ask how the description of Christian belief as "a personal relationship
with a personal God" could be regarded by me as a "twisted and presumptuous
characterization" of this great religion. What you failed to note and hope
the readership doesn't notice, is that I referred to your presentation of my
position on abortion as "twisted and presumptuous". Period. You could bring
your grade up if you would stop quoting out of context......
As for my "view" of the soul, I would not be foolish enough to advise folks
about the exact nature of such concepts. I merely speculated that at some
point we may come to understand these concepts far better than we do at
present. And I think that science and religion may dovetail in some astonishing
Chewing gum in class, __ Tony
More information about the Vision2020