[Vision2020] Playfield

[Matt Decker]

Shawn,

Thanks for your input. My whole point about the ballfields is that if we are 
going to fork out the money for our kids, then lets do it right the first 
time. I understand that an intercom system would infringe on other peace and 
quite. I however, don't understand how lights will interupt the use of the 
park. Heck I'm from Moscow and I know how big the arberitum(spelling) is. I 
also know that some will say "let's move on with the building process". I 
disagree.

How much is this going to cost, in order to place 7 fields of pasture? In a 
sense that is what it is, without lights. I say this will cost 400k by the 
time its done for the city. How much would the lights cost? Would they not 
provide the true sense of a baseball field? Heck even my cubbies and Wigley 
field did it.

Lets figure the numbers out first, do it right the first time, and give this 
oppurtunity to our children.

MD



>From: "Shawn Clabough" <shawnc at outtrack.com>
>To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Playfield
>Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 21:19:28 -0700
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
>[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of James Reynolds
>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 7:13 AM
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Playfield
>
>Matt,
>
>I wasn't part of the committee but judging from the makeup it seems that
>the
>interested parties were all engaged so I am allowing their compromise to
>
>stand for me also. Of course some folk wanted lights or it would not
>have
>been an issue but the final thought of the committee was that the lights
>
>would cause more harm than good. I think that this was driven most by
>the
>fact that the UI has the observatory on the golf course hill and the
>southern sky is very important to that program. It seems reasonable that
>the
>lights not be put up if they would impinge upon an existing use of that
>horizon.
>
>I am also not so sure that the lights would be much utilized by the
>children. It seems as if the lights were more wanted by the adult league
>
>teams and the new fields are supposed to be for the children.
>
>James Reynolds
>
>-------------
>
>As I do the scheduling for the Cal Ripken league (8-12 year olds), I
>will speak to this.  I will first say that I am happy that there was a
>compromise reached and happy that the number of fields was kept and the
>committee acknowledged that there is still additional need and for some
>location to have lights.
>
>As for the kids using the lights, I would have to disagree that they
>would not use them.  I could put them to good use.  As it is now, during
>the first half of the season, I schedule games at 4pm and 6pm so that
>the later game can finish by 8pm just as the sun goes down.  This is not
>the best because the 4pm games causes parents to have to leave work
>and/or have someone else take their child to the game and they miss most
>or all of the game.  For the 6pm game, the shadows do get long towards
>the end of the game and it becomes hard to see the ball.  For the second
>half of the season, I switch to 5pm and 7pm game times to make it easier
>on parents, but lighting during the 7pm game would still be beneficial.
>
>I would like to thank the committee for their work on this and look
>forward to having the fields ready for use.  There are 19 teams (over
>200 children) in the Cal Ripken league this year and finding fields to
>get everyone a fair amount of games can be difficult and these new
>fields will help.  The league has been expanding every year, so having
>them acknowledge need beyond these fields is appreciated.
>
>Shawn Clabough
>
>
>_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/