[Vision2020] Eugenie Scott's Talk at U of I

[Robert Dickow]

            Did Eugenie Scott point out that at the most general level the
entire Creation Science argument is based on a fairly clear non-sequitur in
reasoning? The observation of complex systems or patterns is not a logical
basis for concluding the involvement of an intelligent creator in that
object, nor does it imply the existence of such a creator or being. This
does not belie that God exists. Of course God exists. But still the logical
connection above is fallacious. 

 

Bob Dickow

 

-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 11:27 AM
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] Eugenie Scott's Talk at U of I

 

I attended the presentation by Eugenie Scott last night at the U of I
regarding the scientific qualification of Creation Science and Intelligent
Design.  I enjoyed the talk very much.  Scott is a fabulous public speaker
and has put together a high quality PowerPoint presentation. She also
appears to be highly qualified to speak to the subject. Many aspects of the
talk were also 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20051013/5068112b/attachment.htm