[Vision2020] Response to Burns' Rant
Christian Burns
christian.burns at gmail.com
Tue Mar 1 18:51:53 PST 2005
Art, who do you think I am? My real name is Christian Burns.
Like I said, there are staff at U of I that could confirm this. In
fact you could confim it too, if you had a clue. But I dont feel like
giving clues.
Christian Burns
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:59:29 -0800, Art Deco <deco at moscow.com> wrote:
> Nick,
>
> If Burns would have the courage to sign his real name, you would understand
> why (psychologically) he holds these views.
>
>
> Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
> deco at moscow.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nicholas Gier" <ngier at uidaho.edu>
> To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:16 PM
> Subject: [Vision2020] Response to Burns' Rant
>
> > Dear Mr. Burns,
> >
> > You seem to have missed the main point of my letter about Wilkins. Just
> > because you heard Wilkins and thought "he made sense" has nothing to do
> > with my charge that he has lifted passages from at least three major works
> > without citation or with very deceptive citation. Professors fail
> > students for doing this, but Wilkins' and Wilson's infractions are far
> > worst than this. Wilson's Canon Press made a profit on selling the
> > slavery booklet for 10 years, making a profit on reproducing other
> > scholars' words as if they were their own.
> >
> > Mr. Burns, if you "want to read and understand history," you should read
> > professional historians not hacks such as Wilson and Wilkins who have no
> > shame let alone credentials to write accurate history.
> >
> > Yes, there are people on this forum whom I would call "libertarians."
> > Dave Budge is one of them and Dale Courtney claims to be one. But his
> > type of Christianity (and yours, too, Mr. Burns)is totally incompatible
> > with libertarianism. I'm still waiting for Courtnery to respond to my
> > essay on the topic. I would appreciate your response, too, Mr. Burns.
> > You can find it at www.class.uidhao.edu/ngier/libchristian.htm.
> >
> > You then seem to switch to another article of mine, "Chilling Parallels
> > between Christian and Muslim Fundamentalism," so I'll respond to you
> > points in turn
> >
> > (1) An arrogant proclamation of those
> > who are saved and those who damned;
> >
> > I am not the one who says who is saved and who is damned,
> >
> > I'm glad that you don't, but Doug Jones said that the Rev. Forrest Church
> > was damned in his debate with Chruch on Sept. 30, 2003 at UI SUB
> > Auditorium.
> >
> >
> > (4) a serious affirmation that the laws of God
> > should be the laws of the land.
> >
> > I'm glad that my friend Tom Hansen gave you a nice link on Common Law for
> > your edification. I would just like to add that in the 17th Century
> > Edward Coke, interpreting English Common Law with regard to abortion,
> > ruled that the fetus has no rights until it is born. But you missed the
> > point of my paragraph. Wilson and Co. want all Old Testament laws to
> > become laws of the land, including death for homosexuality, disobedient
> > children, apostasy, etc, etc, etc. I would also like for you to respond
> > to my article on abortion at www.class.uidaho.edu/ngier/103/abortion.htm
> > and see if you can give me a coherent biblical defense.
> >
> > You should read more carefully next time you decide to rant,
> >
> > Nick Gier, Head Banshee, Palouse Region, Planet Earth
> >
> >
> >
> > _____________________________________________________
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > http://www.fsr.net
> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> >
> >
>
> _____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list