[Vision2020] A Short Look at Wayne Fox and the Truth
Art Deco
deco at moscow.com
Wed Jun 1 15:44:03 PDT 2005
Donovan,
As usual you have your slanderous facts completely wrong. I resigned from
POW over policy differences. I was not asked to resign; on the contrary I
was asked not to resign. If you doubt this simply email Sid Eder, POW
President, at side at uidho.edu and ask him if I was asked to resign. You
have my permission to post his reply.
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
deco at moscow.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
To: "Art Deco" <deco at moscow.com>; "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Short Look at Wayne Fox and the Truth
> Wayne,
>
> Since you are still on the accusation crusade, were
> you not asked to resign from the POW board for your
> misbehavior and verbal harassment of witnesses? What
> is the phrase,"Those that live in glass houses should
> not throw stones."
>
> Donovan J Arnold
>
> --- Art Deco <deco at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>> Phil,
>>
>> Please humor a senile old man.
>>
>> Your answer is still ambiguous and evasive. I am
>> not asking at this time about who wrote/assembled
>> the entire voluminous pre-preliminary order
>> submittal (or report as you call it) by Naylor
>> Farms.
>>
>> I am only asking specifically whether you
>> wrote/dictated/authored the Naylor Farms Exhibits
>> 11a and 11b as stated in the findings of the IDWR
>> Preliminary Order.
>>
>>
>>
>> I do not understand and I suspect all those
>> following this simple thread do not understand your
>> extreme reluctance to clearly and to unambiguously
>> acknowledge or disclaim your authorship.
>>
>> For the sake of your own past, current, and future
>> credibility, please answer either "Yes." or "No." to
>> the following two simple questions:
>>
>> 1. Are you the author of Exhibit 11a (as
>> described above)?
>>
>> 2. Are you the author of Exhibit 11b (as
>> described above)?
>>
>> Perhaps my senility is causing you the frustration
>> apparent in your last responses. If so, I
>> apologize. But Phil, please deign to specifically
>> answer the Yes/No questions above, so clear that an
>> 8 year old child and a senile 64 year old man can
>> comprehend your answers -- with simple Yeses or Nos.
>>
>> Thank you for your kind consideration.
>>
>> Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
>> deco at moscow.com
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Phil Nisbet" <pcnisbet1 at hotmail.com>
>> To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Short Look at Phil
>> Nisbet and the Truth
>>
>>
>> > Wayne writes
>> >
>> > "Are you the author of the items labeled Exhibit
>> 11a and 11b in the IDWR
>> > Preliminary Order?
>> >
>> >>This calls for a simple "Yes." or "No." answer."
>> >
>> > Wayne, how many meanings can you attribute to "
>> No, I did not prepare a
>> > report for the Naylors."?
>> >
>> > Was the no in Yiddish or perhaps I had Ivrit
>> script up?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>From: "Art Deco" <deco at moscow.com>
>> >>To: "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> >>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Short Look at Phil
>> Nisbet and the Truth
>> >>Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 19:27:30 -0700
>> >>
>> >>Phil,
>> >>
>> >>You are avoiding the question.
>> >>
>> >>Here it is again, only simpler:
>> >>
>> >>Are you the author of the items labeled Exhibit
>> 11a and 11b in the IDWR
>> >>Preliminary Order?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>This calls for a simple "Yes." or "No." answer.
>> >>
>> >>Avoiding directly answering this question will
>> certainly destroy any
>> >>credibility you may have on Vision 2020.
>> >>
>> >>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
>> >>deco at moscow.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>----- Original Message -----
>> >>From: "Phil Nisbet" <pcnisbet1 at hotmail.com>
>> >>To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> >>Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:55 PM
>> >>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Short Look at Phil
>> Nisbet and the Truth
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Wayne
>> >> >
>> >> > And which part of "You have not read anything I
>> have written" was not
>> >> > comprhendible?
>> >> >
>> >> > If, for example, somebody else posts an article
>> on the web titled "How I
>> >> > Love Hitler" by Wayne Fox, should we assume
>> that you are a Nazi Wayne?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes there is something with my name on it that
>> is part of the Naylors
>> >>report
>> >> > of 500 pages. No, I did not prepare a report
>> for the Naylors.
>> >> >
>> >> > Phil Nisbet
>> >> >
>> >> >>From: "Art Deco" <deco at moscow.com>
>> >> >>To: "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> >> >>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Geeh melynda
>> >> >>Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 15:40:45 -0700
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Phil,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>This is like pissing in the wind.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Phil quotes me and responds:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>[Wayne writes
>> >> >>
>> >> >>"Only the dribble you wrote, was made part of
>> the public record in the
>> >> >>Naylor Farms water permit application, and was
>> submitted by Naylor Farms
>> >>to
>> >> >>the IDWR attempting to demonstrate there was no
>> connection between the
>> >> >>water to be drawn from the Naylor Farms
>> property and water drawn from
>> >> >>Moscow wells."
>> >> >>
>> >> >>As I previously stated, you have never read
>> anything that I have written
>> >>on
>> >> >>the subject.]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Is this an admission that you did not write the
>> material submitted under
>> >> >>your name by Naylor Farms under oath in the
>> first IDWR hearing on this
>> >> >>matter?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Phil writes:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>[What claims would those be Wayne? Because I
>> have read all the
>> >>testimony
>> >> >>and all the relevant documents and see no
>> evidence that anything that I
>> >> >>have actually written or given testimony to has
>> ever been refuted.]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>We must live in different universes.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Here is a Conclusion of Law from the IDWR
>> Preliminary Order in this
>> >>matter
>> >> >>that was drawn from your testimony and written
>> material submitted under
>> >> >>your name:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>-------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>-------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>In rebuttal, here is an excerpt from the Bush,
>> et al letter referenced
>> >> >>before. Notice the accusation of plagiarism in
>> 4) below.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>----------------------------------------
>> >> >>1) The sequence of sediments the
>> Naylor wells will be
>> >> >>pumping from is laterally equivalent to the
>> upper Grande Ronde Basalt
>>
> === message truncated ===>
> _____________________________________________________
>> List services made available by First Step
>> Internet,
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>
>> http://www.fsr.net
>>
>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list