[Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick and his Allies were Wrong

[Donovan Arnold]

Carl,

If you are wanting to perform brain surgery for your
overly emotional and irrational friends I suggest you
do the following.

First, try and see if you can get blood flowing back
to the cerebral cortex. This will restore the higher
functioning portions of the brain that control logic
and reasoning.

If this is unsuccessful, I would suggest making about
a 1 inch deep incision on the lower portions of the
motor cortex, both the left and right hemispheres.
These incisions will disable the ability of your
friend to control their mouth, lips, throat and
tongue. Now this will not help the patient, but it
does wonders for everyone else around them.

Thanks for your funnies,

Donovan J Arnold

--- Carl Westberg <carlwestberg846 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Well, Donovan, now that you've straightened the
> unwashed masses out on 
> taxes, I need your assistance on a tricky matter. 
> I've going to assist in 
> an as yet untried, unproven brain transplant
> procedure.  Dr. Sarah Bellum 
> and I will be replacing the brain of an
> Ultra-liberal with that of a 
> thoughtful, extremely knowledgeable young former
> ASUI senator, hoping it 
> will help the poor, benighted Ultra-liberal come to
> his senses.  My question 
> is:  would you recommend making the incision near
> the brainstem, the 
> cerebellum, the hypothalamus, or the cerebrum?  Most
> importantly, should we 
> use a phillips or flat-head screwdriver?            
>                         
>                                                     
>                         
>                                                     
>                         
>                                                     
>                         
>   Carl Westberg Jr.
> 
> >From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
> >To: Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>,
> predator75 at moscow.com,  
> >       vision2020 at moscow.com
> >Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick
> and his Allies were 
> >Wrong
> >Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Sunil,
> >
> >There may be a new tax, but if your taxes overall
> go
> >down that to me is a tax decrease. Now you can
> argue
> >that if your taxes decrease that is a increase
> because
> >of the legal and political garbage behind it, but
> it
> >is still a decrease in your taxes. $95 instead of
> $100
> >is less, not more. A zero tax would be less than
> $100
> >too. But $95 is still less than $100 according to
> my
> >wallet.
> >
> >If you want to argue that $100 is less than $95
> >because $0.00 is less than $95 you are welcome to
> do
> >so but it is not an argument worthy of my time.
> >
> >
> >Donovan J Arnold
> >
> >--- Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------
> >
> >Donovan,
> >
> >Since I lack Dan's big brain I am also having
> trouble
> >following your tax cut logic.  You write that the
> levy
> >they're paying on NOW is set to expire.  Once that
> >happens, that bill is gone.  They have then agreed
> to
> >a new tax.  Now, if they had voted it down, they
> >wouldn't pay any tax at all.  That would be a zero
> tax
> >as far as levies are concerned.  To use your
> example,
> >they'd go from a $100 tax to a $0.00 tax
> >
> >Since they've agreed to a new tax, isn't that a tax
> >increase?  Haven't they gone from $0.00 to $95, to
> use
> >your example again?
> >If I have this wrong, please type your response
> >slowly, so that I can follow you.
> >
> >Sunil
> >
> >
> > >From: Donovan Arnold
> <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
> > >To: Dan Carscallen <predator75 at moscow.com>,
> >"'Vision 2020'" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> > >Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fortunately Phil
> Roderick
> >and his Allies were Wrong
> > >Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > >Dan, Dan, Dan. . .
> > >
> > >No. That is not what I am saying, and if you read
> >even
> > >just the first few lines of the article you would
> > >understand.
> > >
> > >The old levy that the residents are still paying
> on
> > >NOW is set to expire. This new levy will cost
> less
> > >than the one set to expire. So they will be a
> getting
> > >tax cut.
> > >
> > >
> > >Think of it like this, you are paying $100 on an
> old
> > >levy, with the levy that passed it will only be
> $95.
> > >That is a tax cut of $5. The old levy wanted you
> to
> > >pay $110, which failed. It is pretty simple to
> figure
> > >out why this one passed. It had nothing to do
> with
> > >people in Moscow hating children and people in
> > >Boundary county loving children as Wayne
> concludes.
> > >
> > >Still hoping you will use your "thinking
> >thingamabob".
> > >
> > >Donovan J Arnold
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Yahoo! Mail Mobile
> >Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your
> mobile phone.
> >http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
> >
>
>_____________________________________________________
> >  List services made available by First Step
> Internet,
> >  serving the communities of the Palouse since
> 1994.
> >                http://www.fsr.net
> >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> 
> 
>
_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step
> Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
>  
>                http://www.fsr.net                   
>    
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com