[Vision2020] 07 05 05 Ny Times: United Church of Christ Backs Same-Sex Marriage

[donald toogood]

I understood what you wrote just fine but you didn't get what I wrote or
either you don't want to talk about it. What you wrote about isn't about
a man marrying a man or a woman marrying a woman just different races.
What I mean is that it's not marriage if the same sexes say they're
married at all. You didn't say anything about what I wrote before about
the aclu wanting to use a same sex marriage to say it's ok for those
people down in utah to have like four or five wives that's what this gay
marriage is gonna end up making ok. They use one thing like man marrying
a man to mean its ok for these people to marry four or five at a time.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Scott Dredge"
  To: "donald toogood" , vision2020 at moscow.com
  Subject: Re: [Vision2020] 07 05 05 Ny Times: United Church of Christ
  Backs Same-Sex Marriage
  Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 19:40:39 -0700 (PDT)

  >
  > Maybe you didn't understand my comment. At one point
  > in this country not so long ago (around 1950), many
  > states outlawed interracial marriages...something like
  > 38 states banned them. Some had bans within their
  > state constitutions. The reason why I bring this up
  > is that it is a direct parallel to banning same sex
  > marriage.
  >
  > Roughly 60 years ago in this country, interracial
  > marriages were banned. A black man marrying a white
  > woman was illegal. A white man marrying a black woman
  > was illegal. You claim this isn't the same thing as a
  > man marrying a man or a woman marrying a woman. Why?
  > If at one point, there were laws against interracial
  > marriage and same sex marriage, what's the difference?
  > They were both considered illegal marriages.
  >
  > Married can mean between a man and a woman. However,
  > same sex couples in a civil union deserve the exact
  > same rights as married couples.
  >
  > -Scott
  >
  > --- donald toogood wrote:
  >
  > > Black men and white women or white women and black
  > > men marrying isnt' a
  > > man marrying a man or a woman marrying woman.It's
  > > different. How can you
  > > say it's like that? Whites marrying blacks was still
  > > marrying a different
  > > sex, not like they want to do now. It's not bashing
  > > anybody, it's just
  > > not calling getting together with the same sex being
  > > married. Married
  > > means between a man and a woman and that's all.
  > >
  > > ----- Original Message -----
  > > From: "Scott Dredge"
  > > To: vision2020 at moscow.com
  > > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] 07 05 05 Ny Times:
  > > United Church of Christ
  > > Backs Same-Sex Marriage
  > > Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
  > >
  > > >
  > > > Churches will adapt. It wasn't very long ago
  > > that
  > > > interracial marriages were banned. It's bad PR
  > > for
  > > > the churches to continuously bash homosexuals
  > > and it's
  > > > a losing battle.
  > > >
  > > > -Scott
  > > >
  > > > --- donald toogood wrote:
  > > >
  > > > > That headline says the church did it. But if
  > > you
  > > > > read on down it was just
  > > > > most of 800 delegates. The people in the
  > > churches
  > > > > didn't have any say in
  > > > > it. No wonder churches like this are losing
  > > their
  > > > > members. The big shots
  > > > > in the churches are making it so they don't
  > > stand
  > > > > for anything at all.
  > > > > They'll go ahead and do something they know is
  > > wrong
  > > > > just so a few people
  > > > > won't badmouth them. Well maybe it makes them
  > > feel
  > > > > better, but pretty
  > > > > soon they'll be preaching to empty churches.
  > > Just
  > > > > like it says in this
  > > > > article, some of the churches are probably
  > > gonna get
  > > > > out of that religion
  > > > > if they let this gay marrying thing go.
  > > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > >
  > _____________________________________________________
  > > > List services made available by First Step
  > > Internet,
  > > > serving the communities of the Palouse since
  > > 1994.
  > > > http://www.fsr.net
  > > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
  > > >
  > >
  > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
  > >
  > > --
  > ___________________________________________________________
  > > Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
  > > http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
  > >
  > > >
  > _____________________________________________________
  > > List services made available by First Step
  > > Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
  > > http://www.fsr.net
  > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
  > >
  > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
  > >

-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20050716/c9d09b0a/attachment-0001.htm