[Vision2020] 07 05 05 Ny Times: United Church of Christ BacksSame-Sex Marriage

Scott Dredge sdredge at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 8 23:38:58 PDT 2005


Pat,

Why were interracial marriages banned?  Don't you
think that the battle cry of "it's immoral" was the
reason for this injustice?

You tell me what the difference is.  Interracial
couples were denied equal rights because such unions
were against the law.  Even a few years ago, Bob Jones
University still had a ban on interracial dating. 
Doesn't this seem immature?  Shouldn't a consenting
adult be allowed to date another consenting adult
without being punished for it?

And yet presently, same sex couples are denied equal
rights because such unions are against the law.

You throw around the phrase "morality" as some sort of
catch all.  How moral is it to be cruel to people who
are pursuing their life, liberty, and happiness and
who are not hurting anyone else in the process?

-Scott

--- Pat Kraut <pkraut at moscow.com> wrote:

> You truly cannot see the difference...no wonder our
> kids don't know what
> morality is. We are doomed!
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Scott Dredge" <sdredge at yahoo.com>
> To: "donald toogood" <dtoogood at email.com>;
> <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] 07 05 05 Ny Times: United
> Church of Christ
> BacksSame-Sex Marriage
> 
> 
> Maybe you didn't understand my comment.  At one
> point
> in this country not so long ago (around 1950), many
> states outlawed interracial marriages...something
> like
> 38 states banned them.  Some had bans within their
> state constitutions.  The reason why I bring this up
> is that it is a direct parallel to banning same sex
> marriage.
> 
> Roughly 60 years ago in this country, interracial
> marriages were banned.  A black man marrying a white
> woman was illegal.  A white man marrying a black
> woman
> was illegal.  You claim this isn't the same thing as
> a
> man marrying a man or a woman marrying a woman. 
> Why?
> If at one point, there were laws against interracial
> marriage and same sex marriage, what's the
> difference?
>  They were both considered illegal marriages.
> 
> Married can mean between a man and a woman. 
> However,
> same sex couples in a civil union deserve the exact
> same rights as married couples.
> 
> -Scott
> 
> --- donald toogood <dtoogood at email.com> wrote:
> 
> > Black men and white women or white women and black
> > men marrying isnt' a
> > man marrying a man or a woman marrying woman.It's
> > different.  How can you
> > say it's like that? Whites marrying blacks was
> still
> > marrying a different
> > sex, not like they want to do now. It's not
> bashing
> > anybody, it's just
> > not calling getting together with the same sex
> being
> > married. Married
> > means between a man and a woman and that's all.
> >
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: "Scott Dredge"
> >   To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> >   Subject: Re: [Vision2020] 07 05 05 Ny Times:
> > United Church of Christ
> >   Backs Same-Sex Marriage
> >   Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >   >
> >   > Churches will adapt. It wasn't very long ago
> > that
> >   > interracial marriages were banned. It's bad PR
> > for
> >   > the churches to continuously bash homosexuals
> > and it's
> >   > a losing battle.
> >   >
> >   > -Scott
> >   >
> >   > --- donald toogood wrote:
> >   >
> >   > > That headline says the church did it. But if
> > you
> >   > > read on down it was just
> >   > > most of 800 delegates. The people in the
> > churches
> >   > > didn't have any say in
> >   > > it. No wonder churches like this are losing
> > their
> >   > > members. The big shots
> >   > > in the churches are making it so they don't
> > stand
> >   > > for anything at all.
> >   > > They'll go ahead and do something they know
> is
> > wrong
> >   > > just so a few people
> >   > > won't badmouth them. Well maybe it makes
> them
> > feel
> >   > > better, but pretty
> >   > > soon they'll be preaching to empty churches.
> > Just
> >   > > like it says in this
> >   > > article, some of the churches are probably
> > gonna get
> >   > > out of that religion
> >   > > if they let this gay marrying thing go.
> >   > >
> >   >
> >   >
> >
>
_____________________________________________________
> >   > List services made available by First Step
> > Internet,
> >   > serving the communities of the Palouse since
> > 1994.
> >   > http://www.fsr.net
> >   > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >   >
> >
>
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> >
> > -- 
> >
>
___________________________________________________________
> > Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
> > http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
> >
> > >
>
_____________________________________________________
> >  List services made available by First Step
> > Internet,
> >  serving the communities of the Palouse since
> 1994.
> >
> >                http://www.fsr.net
> >
> >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >
>
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> >
> 
>
_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step
> Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> 
> 
>
_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step
> Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
>  
>                http://www.fsr.net                   
>    
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> 



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list