[Vision2020] The Future
Mark Seman
FCS at Moscow.com
Wed Jul 6 00:55:08 PDT 2005
Chris,
There are so many complex reasons for my needing to take a sabbatical from
the Palouse and I won't be able to fully explain. Economics are a small
part, even though we are on track to have our best year for gross receipts,
too many people want something for nothing. A larger aspect is the level of
quality desired by this region has always been lacking. It takes a certain
level of sophistication for clients to understand that as designers we are
not producers of blueprints. Our product is the built environment and there
are very significant quality issues that we bring to projects. Too often I
hear laments about area development, but correspondingly little effort is
ever expended towards providing better.
Another significant part, is living in the middle of the "Hearth of the
Arts." I have too little time in my life to remain creatively suppressed.
I need to live where I can produce quality work, and until the Palouse
becomes sophisticated enough to recognize and value quality, there are other
places where I can do better. My work is not an art that hangs on a wall,
it is an art to be experienced and lived in. I want my work to be art, but
I cannot do that - the time is not here, not now.
This areas' anti-business, anti-art, anti-development, anti-commerce,
anti-productive mentality is heavily entrenched throughout multiple
channels. You have a much greater appreciation for LEDC than I. I more
often see businesses, Universities, governmental entities, civic groups, and
citizens being a problem source than a problem solution. Because of my
persistent negative perceptions, I feel I need a vacation. And it's not
going to be just for a couple of weeks. What I need is an extended working
vacation. One where I can work creatively, be challenged, be mentored, be a
mentor, learn better community development strategies, meet new people that
understand progress, study better zoning ordinances - a lot of the same
stuff that I would like to accomplished here, but can't.
I believe Moscow and the Palouse will improve in the future. Although it
will take a long time for the political climate to be favorable for northern
Idaho, the winds will change. UI will regain its balance and provide
renewed optimism. Other entities needing to re-assess, will have the
opportunity to restructure. I even expect to have better resources
in-place, so I can sometime return to practice my art. For now though, I
have projects to work on in Prescott and I can acquire the challenges I
need.
Mark
Mark Seman, Architect
Heather Seman, Landscape Architect
1404 East 'F' Street Moscow, Idaho 83843
v 208-883-3276 / f 208-883-0112
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Storhok [mailto:cstorhok at co.fairbanks.ak.us]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:35 PM
To: 'Mark Seman'; Phil Nisbet; vision2020 at Moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] The Future
Mark,
I hate to hear you are hitting the road as well....times are tough. Phil
and you are correct that Moscow and the UI are in a lot of trouble. The UI
will continue to bleed until someone steps into the Governor's Office and
politely asks him to sack the entire State Board of Education, this board
has stated over and over again that it will continue to punish the UI for
its mistakes with the Boise development..that kind of attitude does not have
a place in government. With the UI comprising 40 to 50% of Moscow's
economy, Moscow really does not have a chance of pulling out of its funk
until problems with the UI, the state legislature, the state board of
education and the governor's office are straightened out. I know that
Representatives Trial and Ringo and Senator Schroeder have done all they can
to support the UI, Moscow, and Latah County; but fighting the Ada/BSU mob
and a board of education that is out of control is just about impossible
given the state's current political climate.
I know that Barb Crouch/LEDC is working on everything possible to help
establish a firm foundation for economic diversification, however the
naysayers that continuously oppose Alturas II, box stores, and the like are
really hurting any chance for success. The entire concept of Alturas is to
expand and diversify the economy through local innovation and
entrepreneurship, yet oddly it has served as the whipping boy for the anti's
since day one. Why local citizens want to stifle growth based on
development of local businesses is beyond me and truly is a very selfish
position to take. I know when I was working for the county we really did
not spend time or resources trying to land the big fish; Barb, and LEDC as
far as I know, has not gone that route either. In this day of international
competition for jobs, Moscow (and Latah County as a whole) really is not
capable of landing a Dell, instead the strength of the area is local
entrepreneurial development through promoting innovation from research at
both the UI and WSU. Unfortunately, as Phil has pointed out, the UI has
been distracted from developing its programs in Moscow. I really hope that
the City and the County can reignite its past efforts to work with the UI
and again develop Moscow and the UI in a responsible manner. To do that
though will take support from citizens.
It saddens me to hear that you and Heather have become the latest victims of
the anti-business crowd. Full Circle Studios has been such a supporter of
Moscow and its various institutions, that losing you is a big blow to the
community and the economy. Phil said it well, last one out turn off the
lights.
Take Care,
Chris
Chris Storhok
North Pole, Alaska
-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]On Behalf Of Mark Seman
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 9:57 PM
To: Phil Nisbet; vision2020 at Moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] The Future
Phil,
Your perspective is so refreshing to see posted ... maybe because it is
pretty close to mine ... it's almost scary. You name just a few of Moscow's
problems, and there are so many more. Moscow's current problems lie in its
angst to try and discover what it is to be. There is plenty of bashing and
too little problem solving, but this is part of its process of learning what
it wants. At some point in time I expect to see movement towards
constructive criticism and actual community building. When the leaders,
business people and citizens work towards consensus, this movement can go
forward. Until then, too many self-interests are at work here and leaving
the rest of the community in the dark.
High tech is just one market Moscow is missing out on. But before Moscow
can attract such firms, there needs to be a stable foundation-economy that
maintains a sufficient stardard of living for those outside of this high
tech industry. To maintain our quality of life, there needs to be a quality
of life to maintain. The past efforts of economic development have
attempted to bypass our base economy and rely on attracting outside big
business. The business that has no sense of community, the business that is
attracted by economic & tax incentives, the business that cares not to be
attracted by a strong community-based economic structure.
Your bleak future for Moscow is a reality that can be undermined by the
community. I wish I could stick around to help see a brighter future
happen, but it is beyond my current capacity to even want to continue trying
to live here. I am one of the rats leaving the ship. I'll be the second
architect to leave in two years. My wife will be the second LA to leave
this year. Whether it's common sense, high tech, art, community support, or
common good, Moscow no longer has what it takes to keep us here.
While on sabbatical, we'll keep in touch with friends that remain, to see if
Moscow grows through its teenage-angst and decides to take sure steps in a
positive direction. Until then we'll experience other communities, learn
how they grew through their differences, and if it works out, we'll return
in a couple of years with a greater legitimacy than we were able to acheive
in our 27 years of living here. Best wishes in your vision quest.
Ciao,
Mark
Mark Seman, Architect
Heather Seman, Landscape Architect
1404 East 'F' Street Moscow, Idaho 83843
v 208-883-3276 / f 208-883-0112
-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]On Behalf Of Phil Nisbet
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 5:57 AM
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] The Future
As with so many of the organizations and institutions in the local area that
lay claim to debating "The Future of Moscow", this particular list seems
more pent up on airing political differences that actually talking about the
kind of community anybody wants to see in the future. Insularity and clique
support in attacks on opposition seems the rule, all focused on the here and
now.
Mark Solomon and I have posted, from two very differing views, on water
resources issues. There were very few responses or discussions from that.
However, there is endless discussion of the love hate relationship between
various religions here and endless posts from the "I Hate Bush" crowd of
reposts of Editorial pages.
And as the factions scream at each other here, form organizations to oppose
each other, battle in the papers, in hearings and in the courts, what future
does Moscow have?
Let me give you a very concrete example of why this is important.
Growth in the next decade or two in the US economy is going to be based on
the emergence of the field of Nanotechnology. Universities are receiving
close to a billion dollars a year in support from Federal budgets to study
applications in this field and industry is starting to match and exceed that
spending. Moscow is a university town and while budgets are being cut in
other areas, Nanotech is not being sliced down to size.
So, where is the University of Idaho on Nanotechnology? Right at the
forefront, but not here in Moscow.
While all here have been battling and calling names, the University has
quietly shipped two of the biggest growth areas of Nanotechnology right the
heck out of the Moscow area. The Bio-medical Technology side was shipped up
to Post Falls, so those personnel for the University do not live and
contribute hare and their work will spawn nice clean new spin off jobs
outside of Spokane. The Nanotechnology Electronics folks are centered at a
new institute in Boise and any jobs they spawn and the people working on
them and the huge grants they get, all spread out in Ada not Latah County.
If the current community of Moscow is such a wonderful place to be, why did
our areas biggest employer decide, with absolutely no community input, to
ship those jobs out of the area? Could it be that they realize there is no
future here in Moscow and like rats fleeing the ship, they are sending their
best and brightest to open up new locations?
But what the heck, let's not discuss the future here. Let us simply
continue to back bite and back stab and name call and sh-t in our own nest.
Then the last person out of the University of Idaho can please remember to
shut off the lights, after all, we have to remember to conserve water and
energy.
Phil Nisbet
_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
_____________________________________________________
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
_____________________________________________________
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list