[Vision2020] Chas on Godwin

[Phil Nisbet]

Chas

I have not called anybody a Nazi.  I have noted that Heisenberg was indeed 
one.  I have noted that advocates of using the Uncertainty Principle outside 
of its probablisitic mathematical model for quantum mechanics have indeed 
used it to justify genocide.

I have not called John D a Nazi.

I have not suggested that Nick is one either.

On the other hand, I have been called a bigot and anti-Gentile by both 
persons.

Eugenics was derived by Darwin's brother in law and sanctioned by good old 
Charles himself.  Heisenberg's philosophy was used by the SS who actually 
employed Werner Heisenberg, as a justification for their actions.  Those are 
facts that you can just as easily look up on wikipedia, 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics for an example.

Perhaps I am over sensitive to Nazi War Criminals being made into heros or 
to advocates of mass steralization and genocide being heralded as fine old 
fellows.  Yet I seem to recall that one of the reasons that threads here had 
so roundly condemned Wilson et al was their revisionism regarding slave 
ownership in America.  How exactly is revisionism of history with regards to 
Heisenberg any different?

Phil Nisbet


>From: Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com>
>To: Phil Nisbet <pcnisbet1 at hotmail.com>
>CC: ngier at uidaho.edu, vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Einstein and Quantum Mechanics
>Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:29:34 -0800
>
>I suggest that everyone engaged in this unnecessarily inflammatory
>conversation read this:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_Law

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/