[Vision2020] Wal-Mart Reduces Employment?
Ron Force
rforce at moscow.com
Mon Dec 12 15:18:11 PST 2005
Paul Krugman referenced this study in his column today, but had the source
wrong. It's from the National Bureau of Economic Research. The whole paper
costs $5.
"HISTORY OF THE NBER
Founded in 1920, the National Bureau of Economic Research is a private,
nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to promoting a
greater understanding of how the economy works. The NBER is committed to
undertaking and disseminating unbiased economic research among public
policymakers, business professionals, and the academic community...
THE NBER TODAY
The NBER is the nation's leading nonprofit economic research organization.
Sixteen of the 31 American Nobel Prize winners in Economics and six of the
past Chairmen of the President's Council of Economic Advisers have been
researchers at the NBER. The more than 600 professors of economics and
business now teaching at universities around the country who are NBER
researchers are the leading scholars in their fields. These Bureau
associates concentrate on four types of empirical research: developing new
statistical measurements, estimating quantitative models of economic
behavior, assessing the effects of public policies on the U.S. economy, and
projecting the effects of alternative policy proposals...
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11782
David Neumark, Junfu Zhang, Stephen Ciccarella
NBER Working Paper No. 11782
Issued in November 2005
NBER Program(s): LS
---- Abstract -----
We estimate the effects of Wal-Mart stores on county-level employment and
earnings, accounting for endogeneity of the location and timing of Wal-Mart
openings that most likely biases the evidence against finding adverse
effects of Wal-Mart stores. We address the endogeneity problem using a
natural instrumental variable that arises from the geographic and time
pattern of the opening of Wal-Mart stores, which slowly spread out from the
first stores in Arkansas. In the retail sector, on average, Wal-Mart stores
reduce employment by two to four percent. There is some evidence that
payrolls per worker also decline, by about 3.5 percent, but this conclusion
is less robust. Either way, though, retail earnings fall. Overall, there is
some evidence that Wal-Mart stores increase total employment on the order of
two percent, although not all of the evidence supports this conclusion.
There is stronger evidence that total payrolls per person decline, by about
five percent in the aggregate, implying that residents of local labor
markets earn less following the opening of Wal-Mart stores. And in the
South, where Wal-Mart stores are most prevalent and have been open the
longest, the evidence indicates that Wal-Mart reduces retail employment,
total employment, and total payrolls per person.
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list