[Vision2020] Chamber president: No audit needed
debismith at moscow.com
debismith at moscow.com
Sat Oct 16 10:37:56 PDT 2004
Frankly, I found the meeting itself to be bizarre. I went to the Community Meeting to
learn more about the Chamber because I plan to join. I was hoping my concerns
were not valid, and that I would hear the financial picture was good, and that
Chamber members would be there to discuss some of the Chamber's poor decisions
this past year.
I heard instead that no financial report (other than "We are OK") was available until
later, that Paul Kimmel spends a good deal of his time contacting new businesses
(I've been a "new business" for two years and have never seen or heard from him),
and noticed most of the attendees have some sort of vested interest in Doug
Wilson's empire. When I asked for an application to join the Chamber, they had none
but would be happy to mail one to me if I left all my contact info.
Where were the other business owners listed in the Chamber literature as members?
About 30 people showed up, but there are 35 pages of the Chamber Membership
Directory listing business members. How is it that Moscow continues to allow this
small group of Wilson's people to run the show, padding one another's pockets, and
directing how our community is seen by others? While I'm not saying that the
Chamber is doing a bad job, it appears that no one seems to know (or care) if they
are doing a good job....Before I join, I want to know EXACTLY how my dues will be
spent and who is going to ultimately get them.
Debi Robinson-Smith
From: "Bill London" <london at moscow.com>
Kimmell was exonerated?
Let me see if I got this straight....
1. Questions abound regarding Chamber solvency and financial reporting.
2. The Chamber board orders a financial review.
3. The Chamber staff arranges a member/public meeting to unveil the results of the review.
4. At this member meeting, the results of the review are not released, since the review has not been completed.
5. The Chamber president says no audit is needed because the review has not revealed any problems.
Does anyone else find that situation bizarre? Does anyone else think it sounds much like declaring the defendant innocent while the jury is still deliberating? Or maybe like giving the student an "A" while that student is still finishing up the final?
To me it sounds like a cover-up by an organization that has no interest in an audit, straightening out its finances, or rebuilding its reputation.
This is not the kind of organization that I want to receive my tax dollars, as funneled through the city, county, school district and university.
BL
----- Original Message -----
From: Dale Courtney
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Cc: Dave Glasebrook ; abkulbe at hotmail.com ; Jack Van Deventer ; Donn Morse ; r.contender at juno.com ; Roy Atwood ; Wes ; Greg Dickison ; Mike Hall ; John Carnahan ; Joe Myers ; Keith Deimler ; Doug Wilson ; Doug Farris ; Dale Courtney ; John Moss ; scottwmcd at hotmail.com ; thumper at mail.wsu.edu
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 4:42 PM
Subject: [Vision2020] Chamber president: No audit needed
Kimmell exonerated...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chamber president: No audit needed
Alexis Bacharach
An ongoing review of chamber finances has identified no evidence of financial mismanagement, Moscow Chamber of Commerce President Janice McMillan said.
The review was supposed to be released Thursday to chamber members and other interested members of the public, but McMillan said accountants from Hayden, Ross & Co. still are compiling information.
She confirmed there are concerns about the organization's finances, noting a $20,000 shortfall in accounts receivable. Chamber board members anticipate that deficit will be zeroed out within the month, McMillan said.
"We have about $20,000 worth of travel money that is still out there," she added. "If you don't understand the budget then yes, it looks like we have a problem."
The chamber's financial statements showed a number of irregularities over the past year, including a $74,000 deficit in retained earnings - money that accumulates over the course of a business' operations.
McMillan said board members questioned the accuracy of the chamber's financial information and hired accountants from Hayden, Ross & Co. in Moscow to perform a financial review.
"If there appeared to be a problem over the course of the review, we agreed an audit would be performed," McMillan said. "So far, we've found nothing that suggests a full audit is necessary. We decided to start with a review because they are less expensive."
Accountants reviewed the chamber's finances from 2001 through the current budget month and are preparing comments to accompany the review.
Chamber officials expect the review will be complete sometime next week.
"We had hoped to have our review ready for tonight, but the school district's audit took priority over ours," McMillan explained on Thursday to a group of interested chamber and community members. "We will post our audit review for comment as soon as it is completed."
Officials gave a presentation on the chamber's role and mission instead of discussing the financial issues, which Executive Director Paul Kimmell noted was the main reason people attended Thursday's meeting.
"I know there is concern about the finances which is why many of you are here tonight," Kimmell said. "We understand your concerns. We take our finances very seriously and are constantly looking for ways to streamline this organization."
Kimmell said the chamber is taking a number of steps to improve checks and balances with the organization's financial dealings. Board members have agreed that should funds be available, accountants will be hired to perform annual financial reviews. The board also is in the process of appointing a separate board for the chamber's foundation.
Questions have been raised in recent months as to whether chamber board members also should serve as foundation board members.
The chamber and the foundation are governed by the same board.
McMillan said the dual role might be viewed as a conflict of interest when money and other compensatory items are exchanged between the foundation and the chamber.
According to foundation and chamber financial statements, more than $8,000 has moved between the organizations to pay property management expenses for the chamber's Commerce Center.
McMillan said the appointment of a second board would make everybody's job less confusing.
"Back in 2002, during the purchase of the building, Avista agreed to sell at lower than market value with some trade-offs. The foundation really can't provide those services, but, thinking with their chamber board hats, they committed the chamber to that," McMillan explained. "Perhaps, because they made that commitment, if you had a separate board someone might have said 'wait a minute, can we really do this?' We are a big enough organization to have two boards. It's just a good way to separate the two,
perhaps when we are looking at issues it will be one more opportunity to stop and think."
McMillan said she is satisfied with the steps the board has taken to ensure the chamber is financially solvent.
"You have to understand there are ebbs and flows in chamber finances," she said. "We provided our auditors with all the financial information, and we will share the results of the review as soon we have them."
Alexis Bacharach can be reached at (208) 882-5561, ext. 234, or by e-mail at abacharach at dnews.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_____________________________________________________
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
------- End of forwarded message -------
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list