[Vision2020] Trinity Debate Continues

Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:09:20 EDT

--part1_1e1.22b234c5.2df88220_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Don, Nick et. al.

Alas, my attempt at fun frivolity with theology failed!  Don is saddened by 
the "Trinity" debate, though I was not really "debating," so perhaps I did not 
induce the frowns.

Nick's scholarship is excellent, of course, though his post really didn't 
present a give and take debate.  We would expect Doug Jones to be jumping in to 
argue.  I wonder where does the public find this "debate" conducted?  In the 
pages of Credenda Agenda?

Nick's post on this subject was more like shooting theologically lame fish in 
a barrel than a debate.

Ted Moffett

--part1_1e1.22b234c5.2df88220_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><HTML> 
Don, Nick et. al. 
 
Alas, my attempt at fun frivolity with theology failed!&nbsp; Don is saddene=
d by the "Trinity" debate, though I was not really "debating," so perhaps I=20=
did not induce the frowns. 
 
Nick's scholarship is excellent, of course, though his post really didn't pr=
esent a give and take debate.&nbsp; We would expect Doug Jones to be jumping=
 in to argue.&nbsp; I wonder where does the public find this "debate" conduc=
ted?&nbsp; In the pages of Credenda Agenda? 
 
Nick's post on this subject was more like shooting theologically lame fish i=
n a barrel than a debate. 
 
Ted Moffett</HTML>

--part1_1e1.22b234c5.2df88220_boundary--