[Vision2020] Trinity Debate Continues
Tbertruss@aol.com
Tbertruss@aol.com
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:28:22 EDT
--part1_143.2b1f76ae.2df76d56_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Gentlemen, this debate is pointless, but amusing. The following statement
resolves your difficulties:
All for One and One for All and All is Infinite in Number and Oneness!
Why should God or the number of Gods be limited to a "Trinity?"
And now we return to our normal programming of theological fantasy run amok!
Ted Moffett
--part1_143.2b1f76ae.2df76d56_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 FAMILY=
=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"><BR>
Gentlemen, this debate is pointless, but amusing. The following statement re=
solves your difficulties:<BR>
<BR>
All for One and One for All and All is Infinite in Number and Oneness!<BR>
<BR>
Why should God or the number of Gods be limited to a "Trinity?" <BR>
<BR>
And now we return to our normal programming of theological fantasy run amok!=
<BR>
<BR>
Ted Moffett<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_143.2b1f76ae.2df76d56_boundary--