[Vision2020] Universities, university presses, and Titanic
folly
Jeff Harkins
jeffh@moscow.com
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:06:50 -0800
Thanks Ron for clarifying the situation. I can validate that your comments
are correct.
The press published approximately 41 books over 30 years - none was a
fiscal success. In addition to losing money each year, the Press received
an operating subsidy - in some years totalling $60,000. The only surprise
to me was how long it took to make a decision - the Press has been under
scrutiny for over 6 years.
And it will not be the only cuts we experience in the near term - the UI as
we all know will be scarred for a long time - we must all do our best to
protect the "core" of the place - once we figure out what that is!!
At 12:11 PM 2/24/2004, you wrote:
>I have to make a correction. The UI Press has never made a profit. They ran
>up almost an $800,000 deficit by 2001. That was written off, and the press
>was given a chance to start over on a "break even" basis. They were
>$382,000 in the hole by December 03. Ivar had some good ideas, but it was
>"too little, too late".
>
>One may argue that a university press is a good thing to subsidize in
>comparision to athletics, community education, 4H, or any of many things the
>university does for the state. In fact, most university presses are heavily
>subsidized. For obvious reasons, the university is not in a postion to
>continue to subsidize many of the wonderful things it now does. The Press
>may be only the first of these to go.
>
>**********************************************
>Ron Force Moscow ID 83844
>rforce@moscow.com
>**********************************************
>
>_____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ