[Vision2020]Sandy Berger Exonerated

[Andreas Schou]

The documents that Berger indavertantly took were copies of Clinton-era security documents -- not the originals, and not the *only* copies! -- that he had had a hand in writing. It's not as though he hadn't seen what they contained. If they had been leaked, it would be one thing, but they were not, in fact, leaked to anyone who should not have had them. 

What Berger violated were National Archives procedures, not federal law. While stuffing his socks with docs is a breach of trust and good taste, it is not, in fact, illegal.

-- ACS
-------------- next part --------------
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
_____________________________________________________
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯