[Vision2020] Collaborating Tom Hanson's story...

Dale Courtney dmcourtn@moscow.com
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:27:08 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_008E_01C3829F.8DEE1FF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tracing Clark's military map
By Jack Kelly
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published September 19, 2003

Retired Gen. Wesley Clark has thrown his helmet into the ring. He has
improved the Democratic presidential field by entering it, just as he
improved the Army by leaving it.

Gen. Clark is a brilliant man, and a brave one. A Rhodes scholar, he
was decorated three times for heroism as commander of an armor company in
Vietnam.

"Those of us who knew him as a captain thought the country would be
shortchanged if he didn't rise to very high rank," said a retired Army
colonel who was a student of Wesley Clark's when Gen. Clark taught at West
Point.

But Gen.Clark's kindergarten teacher probably noted he doesn't play
well with others.

Gen. Clark "is able, though not nearly as able as he thinks, and has
tended to put his career ahead of his men to the point of excess," said a
defense consultant well acquainted with the Army's senior officers. "He is
opportunistic and lacks integrity. He will be an absolute menace if he
gets into a position where he can exert influence on the Army because he 
lacks true vision and is prone to be vindictive."

Gen. Clark "regards each and every one of his subordinates as a
potential threat to his career," said an officer who served under him when
Gen. Clark commanded a brigade of the 4th Infantry Division in the 1980s.
An officer who served under Clark when he commanded the 1st Cavalry
Division said he was "the poster child for everything that is wrong with
the general officer corps."

Gen. Clark doesn't get along terribly well with superiors or with
allies either, which lead to his premature departure as commander of NATO.

Gen. Clark was CINCEUR when the Kosovo war began, and bears much of
the responsibility for President Clinton's decision to try to bomb Serb
dictator Slobodan Milosevic out of Kosovo. Gen. Clark argued that after a
few days of bombing, Mr. Milosevic would fold his tent and slink away.
When the Serbs didn't budge after months of bombing, Gen. Clark lost Mr.
Clinton's favor.

As the war dragged on, Gen. Clark advocated the use of ground troops.
This put him at loggerheads with Gen. Henry Shelton, the chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, and with Gen. Eric Shinseki, chief of staff of the
Army, who thought this was a terrible idea. These generals faulted Gen.
Clark for getting America into an unnecessary war, and for having done a
poor job of preparing for it.

"NATO did not expect a long war," wrote former Clinton national
security aide Ivo Daalder. "Worse, it did not even prepare for the
possibility."

The conduct of the war drew unprecedented criticism from Gen. Clark's
predecessor, Gen. George Joulwan, and a quiet rebellion by subordinate
commanders.

"Clark found his control over ongoing operations eroding," wrote
retired Army Col. Andrew Bacevich. "Rather than the theater commander, he
became hardly more than a kibitzer."

What may have triggered Gen. Clark's early departure from NATO was a
confrontation with the British general who was to command NATO
peacekeepers.

After a Serb surrender had been negotiated with the help of the
Russians, Gen. Clark ordered British Lt. Gen. Michael Jackson to parachute
troops onto the airport at the Kosovar capital of Pristina, so NATO would
hold it before Russian peacekeepers arrived.

Gen. Jackson refused. "I'm not going to start the Third World War for
you," he told Gen. Clark, according to accounts in British newspapers.
Shortly after the confrontation with Gen. Jackson, Gen. Clark was
told his tour as CINCEUR would end two months early. Neither Gen. Shelton 
nor Defense Secretary William Cohen attended his retirement ceremony, a
remarkable snub for a four-star general.

Gen. Clark read Mr. Milosevic wrong, helping to provoke the Kosovo
war, which he then fought badly. Gen. Clark picked up where he left off in
his second career as a television kibitzer of military operations. As an
analyst for CNN, Gen. Clark harshly criticized the war plan for Iraq
devised by Gen. Tommy Franks, the CENTCOM commander, and Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld. Gen. Clark turned out to be completely wrong.

It says something fascinating about the Democratic field that this
failed general is the class of it.

Jack Kelly, a syndicated columnist, is a former Marine and Green
Beret and a former deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan
administration. He is national security writer for the Pittsburgh (Pa.)
Post-Gazette.


------=_NextPart_000_008E_01C3829F.8DEE1FF0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1226" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
	{font-family:Tahoma;
	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{font-family:Arial;
	color:navy;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY lang=3DEN-US vLink=3Dpurple link=3Dblue bgColor=3Dwhite>
<DIV class=3DSection1>
<DIV>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Tracing Clark's military =
map<BR>By=20
Jack Kelly<BR>THE WASHINGTON TIMES<BR>Published September 19,=20
2003<BR><BR>Retired Gen. Wesley Clark has thrown his helmet into the =
ring. He=20
has<BR>improved the Democratic presidential field by entering it, just =
as=20
he<BR>improved the Army by leaving it.<BR><BR>Gen. Clark is a brilliant =
man, and=20
a brave one. A Rhodes scholar, he<BR>was decorated three times for =
heroism as=20
commander of an armor company in<BR>Vietnam.<BR><BR>"Those of us who =
knew him as=20
a captain thought the country would be<BR>shortchanged if he didn't rise =
to very=20
high rank," said a retired Army<BR>colonel who was a student of Wesley =
Clark's=20
when Gen. Clark taught at West<BR>Point.<BR><BR>But Gen.Clark's =
kindergarten=20
teacher probably noted he doesn't play<BR>well with others.<BR><BR>Gen. =
Clark=20
"is able, though not nearly as able as he thinks, and has<BR>tended to =
put his=20
career ahead of his men to the point of excess," said a<BR>defense =
consultant=20
well acquainted with the Army's senior officers. "He is<BR>opportunistic =
and=20
lacks integrity. He will be an absolute menace if he<BR>gets into a =
position=20
where he can exert influence on the Army because he <BR>lacks true =
vision and is=20
prone to be vindictive."<BR><BR>Gen. Clark "regards each and every one =
of his=20
subordinates as a<BR>potential threat to his career," said an officer =
who served=20
under him when<BR>Gen. Clark commanded a brigade of the 4th Infantry =
Division in=20
the 1980s.<BR>An officer who served under Clark when he commanded the =
1st=20
Cavalry<BR>Division said he was "the poster child for everything that is =
wrong=20
with<BR>the general officer corps."<BR><BR>Gen. Clark doesn't get along =
terribly=20
well with superiors or with<BR>allies either, which lead to his =
premature=20
departure as commander of NATO.<BR><BR>Gen. Clark was CINCEUR when the =
Kosovo=20
war began, and bears much of<BR>the responsibility for President =
Clinton's=20
decision to try to bomb Serb<BR>dictator Slobodan Milosevic out of =
Kosovo. Gen.=20
Clark argued that after a<BR>few days of bombing, Mr. Milosevic would =
fold his=20
tent and slink away.<BR>When the Serbs didn't budge after months of =
bombing,=20
Gen. Clark lost Mr.<BR>Clinton's favor.<BR><BR>As the war dragged on, =
Gen. Clark=20
advocated the use of ground troops.<BR>This put him at loggerheads with =
Gen.=20
Henry Shelton, the chairman of the<BR>Joint Chiefs of Staff, and with =
Gen. Eric=20
Shinseki, chief of staff of the<BR>Army, who thought this was a terrible =
idea.=20
These generals faulted Gen.<BR>Clark for getting America into an =
unnecessary=20
war, and for having done a<BR>poor job of preparing for it.<BR><BR>"NATO =
did not=20
expect a long war," wrote former Clinton national<BR>security aide Ivo =
Daalder.=20
"Worse, it did not even prepare for the<BR>possibility."<BR><BR>The =
conduct of=20
the war drew unprecedented criticism from Gen. Clark's<BR>predecessor, =
Gen.=20
George Joulwan, and a quiet rebellion by=20
subordinate<BR>commanders.<BR><BR>"Clark found his control over ongoing=20
operations eroding," wrote<BR>retired Army Col. Andrew Bacevich. "Rather =
than=20
the theater commander, he<BR>became hardly more than a =
kibitzer."<BR><BR>What=20
may have triggered Gen. Clark's early departure from NATO was =
a<BR>confrontation=20
with the British general who was to command =
NATO<BR>peacekeepers.<BR><BR>After a=20
Serb surrender had been negotiated with the help of the<BR>Russians, =
Gen. Clark=20
ordered British Lt. Gen. Michael Jackson to parachute<BR>troops onto the =
airport=20
at the Kosovar capital of Pristina, so NATO would<BR>hold it before =
Russian=20
peacekeepers arrived.<BR><BR>Gen. Jackson refused. "I'm not going to =
start the=20
Third World War for<BR>you," he told Gen. Clark, according to accounts =
in=20
British newspapers.<BR>Shortly after the confrontation with Gen. =
Jackson, Gen.=20
Clark was<BR>told his tour as CINCEUR would end two months early. =
Neither Gen.=20
Shelton <BR>nor Defense Secretary William Cohen attended his retirement=20
ceremony, a<BR>remarkable snub for a four-star general.<BR><BR>Gen. =
Clark read=20
Mr. Milosevic wrong, helping to provoke the Kosovo<BR>war, which he then =
fought=20
badly. Gen. Clark picked up where he left off in<BR>his second career as =
a=20
television kibitzer of military operations. As an<BR>analyst for CNN, =
Gen. Clark=20
harshly criticized the war plan for Iraq<BR>devised by Gen. Tommy =
Franks, the=20
CENTCOM commander, and Defense Secretary<BR>Donald Rumsfeld. Gen. Clark =
turned=20
out to be completely wrong.<BR><BR>It says something fascinating about =
the=20
Democratic field that this<BR>failed general is the class of =
it.<BR><BR>Jack=20
Kelly, a syndicated columnist, is a former Marine and Green<BR>Beret and =
a=20
former deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the=20
Reagan<BR>administration. He is national security writer for the =
Pittsburgh=20
(Pa.)<BR>Post-Gazette.</SPAN></FONT></P></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_008E_01C3829F.8DEE1FF0--