[Vision2020] More on Dees/SPLC

Melynda Huskey mghuskey@hotmail.com
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:24:41 -0800


Bruce Livingston wrote:

>As for Doug Wilson's co-author, Wilkins,which I guess is what started all 
>of this, I don't know a thing about him.  But if I were trying to build a 
>dossier on the man, I would be looking for more sources than the SPLC.

The SPLC has described *The League of the South* a racist organization.  
Morris Dees probably didn't do the research that resulted in that 
conclusion--but it's not hard to arrive at it oneself.  Wilkins is on the 
Board of the League, which offers these perspectives on their website:

"On Defending the Anglo-Celtic Culture of the South:
"The League seeks to protect the historic Anglo-Celtic core culture of the 
South because the Scots, Irish, Welsh, and English have given Dixie its 
unique institutions and civilisation.  Should the Christian,  Anglo-Celtic 
core be displaced, then the South would cease to be recognisable to us and 
our progeny.  We must maintain this all-important link to our European 
heritage from which we have drawn our inspiration.   Anglo-Celtic 
Southerners and their European cousins have a duty to protect that which our 
ancestors bequeathed us. If we will not promote our own interests, no one 
will do it for us. "

http://www.dixienet.org/positions/free-ac.htm

"This does not mean, however, that we must subscribe to the flawed Jacobin 
notion of egalitarianism, nor does it mean that white Southerners should 
give control over their civilisation and its institutions to another race, 
whether it be native blacks or Hispanic immigrants.  Nowhere, outside of 
liberal dogma, is any nation called upon to commit cultural and ethnic 
suicide.   Furthermore, our surrender would ultimately be regretted by all 
parties as the remaining liberties were squandered by those who had no 
desire to preserve the Eurocentric, (and therefore "racist"), institution of 
the rule of law.
"Let us in the League, then, confidently defend our ethnic, cultural, and 
religious heritage.  After all, we have as much right to do this as anyone.  
Let us also not fall prey to the notion that any other group besides 
ourselves could (or would) defend and preserve the biblically-based rule of 
law that has undergirded our Southern society since its formation."
http://www.dixienet.org/positions/race.htm

"The illicit government in Washington, DC, and its junior partners on the 
State and local levels, know that the real threat to the tyranny they pursue 
is most likely to come from vigilant white men with guns who are jealous of 
their constitutional liberties. Conversely, most "dark skinned" people have 
shown little aversion to the various forms of totalitarian government in our 
modern age. In fact, "big government" poses as the friend and protector of 
the "dark skinned" masses everywhere. Nowhere is this more evident than in 
America's current immigration policy and Washington's firm commitment to 
multiculturalism and diversity (the new civic religion). The resulting 
"browning of America" is seen as a good thing by white liberals, big 
business (cheap labor, you understand), and "dark skinned" folks themselves, 
who see more power accompanying their growing numbers. Clearly, the chief 
enemies of the above-mentioned interests are the descendants of the white, 
Christian founding stock of America."

And because there's more to ethnic diversity in the U.S. than black and 
white, here's Steve Wilkins on Native American culture:

"There is no question that the coming of Christian Europeans brought about 
radical changes in this hemisphere. Many native cultures were never the same 
again. But, the question should be asked, "Was this detrimental or evil?" 
What precisely did the Indians lose because of Christianity?

"We can list a few things: They lost tyranny, oppression, and ignorance. 
They lost the terrifying spirit-world of paganism. They lost their ferocious 
hatred for others that fed fierce racism and cruelty. They lost the 
practices of human sacrifice and cannibalism, infanticide and euthanasia, 
immorality and homosexuality. They lost a way of life predicated upon death 
and destruction. Only in this century have such "losses" been viewed as a 
reason for grief."

http://www.homeschoolchristian.com/ChristianEd/Wilkins.html

Melynda Huskey




Go, said the bird, for the leaves were full of children,
Hidden excitedly, containing laughter.
Go, go, go, said the bird: human kind
Cannot bear very much reality.
Burnt Norton, T.S. Eliot

_________________________________________________________________
Enjoy MSN 8 patented spam control and more with MSN 8 Dial-up Internet 
Service.  Try it FREE for one month!   http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup