[Vision2020] More on Dees/SPLC

amy smoucha asmoucha@hotmail.com
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:26:59 -0600


Again, I think the Southern Poverty Law Center deserves criticism and should 
be reformed.  However, I don't understand the type of criticism--ad hominum 
attacks on Dees without suggestions for improvement--provided by Cockburn 
and others.

SPLC is a non-profit, which means it is a public-benefits organization run 
by a board of directors and officers, not just Dees.  If people really 
believe that an organization like SPLC is needed, but that it is being 
misdirected by Dees, supporters should make that board deal with their 
concerns, and make the non-profit act according to its stated charitable 
purposes.  Donors and potential donors have a lot of standing to influence 
the organization, especially if they are organized.  Information on the 
Directors is available on the website at 
http://www.splcenter.org/center/about.jsp .

Simply attacking Dees serves only to discredit the law center and the 
necessary, unique work it does, and can do in the future.  I am especially 
suspicious of attacks like paragraph 3 of Cockburn's column.  Who cares if 
Dees represented a Klan member in 1960,  when he subsequently proved himself 
an enemy (and target) of the Klan?  Maybe he learned from that experience.  
And, if we're really going to paint people evil for amassing wealth, let's 
spread it around a little--to most of our elected officials, many community 
leaders, etc.  Again, I think the individual choice to amass personal wealth 
at the expense of others in our capitalist economy is obscene, but it's not 
uncommon nor unaccepted. Our society embraces and promotes such aspirations, 
and we glorify the self-made man.   You'd think everyone who criticized Dees 
is a socialist, but I doubt that's the case.

If the non-profit resources of SPLC are not being used according to the 
charitable purposes under which they raised the money, there are productive 
ways to challenge the Directors and the officers.  Attacking an individual 
like Dees--and thereby discrediting the important organization which which 
he is affiliated--is a shallow, unproductive way to fix the problem, and I 
question the motives of those who engage in such attacks.

By the way, SPLC has its annual report, audited financial statement, 990 
etc, on the web at 
http://www.splcenter.org/donate/financialinfo/financial.jsp .

Regarding the WTO info.  You may suggest it is manipulative hype, but I'm 
not so sure.  When I lived in another state, I was an activist with ACORN 
and some local grassroots groups promoting positive welfare refrom.  I 
worked on health care and welfare issues--we were doing community organizing 
and mobilizing poor people to demand the services and assistance they needed 
from the government and from non-profit health care corporations.  One time, 
two people showed up at our rally and invited me to lunch.  They promised 
that they could double the number of people showing up at our rallies, and 
promoted themselves as people interested in seeing "the people" become 
politically active and rising up against the establishment.  I was in the 
middle of a huge campaign, and I no longer have the newsletters they gave me 
or the specifics, but it became obvious that they were interested in 
stirring up organized resistance--the anarchists.  Everything about them was 
creepy, and they kept showing up at our forums and rallies and talking to 
people.  I don't know all of their agenda, because I made myself unavailable 
to them, and our leaders were not interested.  But I have first hand 
knowledge that there are groups out there who try to infiltrate and 
influence grassroots activists.  I have friends who were at the WTO rally 
who reported that the anarchists and others who showed up and began acting 
destructive turned the tone of the rally towards violence.  The book I've 
recommended before, _Blood In the Face_ has interesting information about 
the diffent ideologies in extremist groups.  The odd mixtures of 
Chrisitanity, Consitutionalist ideology (posse comitatus), white supremacy, 
etc. that unfolds in these groups can make for strange bedfellows.  I don't 
disbelieve the infiltration SPLC reports--I think it is possible.

Amy Smoucha


----Original Message Follows----
From: Tim Lohrmann <timlohr@yahoo.com>
To: vision2020@moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] More on Dees/SPLC
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:22:20 -0800 (PST)

Visionaries,
      It was amusing to see one post-er's comment that "despite the drivel 
on this list," one or the other SPLC spokespersons are recognized as 
authorities on hate.
      Sure the SPLC is widely recognized as an authority.
     Cheney and Rumsfield are recognized by some as authorities on 
international policy too.
     Does that mean that those who question their motives and their 
conclusions are guilty of being drooling authors of "drivel?"
     Alexander Cockburn, a mainstay of left/liberal journalism, contributor 
to THE NATION, and one of the editors of COUNTERPUNCH may be many things. 
But guilty of writing "drivel?"
     I don't think so. Cockburn's take on Dees' empire is included below 
this message.

I was particularly interested in Dees' allegation of dangerous racists in 
those who protested the WTO in Seattle. And not only that, he apparently 
used this "finding" in, what else, his relentless fundraising appeals.
     TL


The Dees Money Machine
by Alexander Cockburn

from "Wild Justice," The New York Press

I've long regarded Morris Dees and his Southern Poverty Law Center as
collectively one of the greatest frauds in American life.  The reasons: a
relentless fundraising machine devoted to terrifying its mostly low-income
contributors into unbeltiing ill-spared dollars year after year to an
organization that now has an endowment of more than $100 million, with very
little to show for it beyond hysterical bulletins designed to raise money on
the proposition that only the SPLC can stop Nazism and the KKK from seizing
power.

Gloria Browne, a lawyer who's worked with Dees' outfit, once told the
Montgomery Advertiser that the Southern Poverty Law Center trades in "black
pain and white guilt."  He's the Jim and Tammy Faye Baker of the civil
rights movement.

In fact, Dees began the 1960's as an attorney in Montgomery, representing a
Ku Klux Klan sympathizer, Claude Henley, who had led an attack on Freedom
Riders at the local bus station.  Dees has denied he was ever personally
supportive of the Klan or Henley, but his former partner, Millard Farmer,
has said, "We expressed openly our sympathies and support for what happened
at the bus station."  For the rest of the 1960s Dees sat on the sidelines
and got rich from marketing "Famous Recipe" cookbooks with Farmer; he built
a tennis court, pool, high-quality stables and got a Rolls-Royce.

He founded the SPLC in 1971.  In the end Dees and Farmer fell out, with
Farmer (who later gave away most of his money and started Habitat for
Humanity) saying bitterly, "If an issue isn't bringing in money, he's off to
the woods.  He may believe [in civil rights] but he'll quit doing the work
if it doesn't make money." Farmer says of the Southern Poverty Law Center
that it's "little more than a 900 number."

Dees has always been alert to the paranoias of the hour.  The center's
entire legal staff resigned in the late 1980s, in part because Dees was
reluctant to take up legal issues of real importance to poor people.  His
obsession was the Klanwatch Project, a cash cow for the SPLC.  Literature
from the SPLC portrayed the Klan as poised to take over American and embark
on an orgy of burning and lynching.  This was at a time when the major
danger to poor people was going to be welfare reform , a collusive project
between the Gingrich Republicans and Clinton liberals, among the latter
being many fervent supporters of Dees.  Dees sits on a mountain of cash, but
his courtroom forays are not profuse.  In the early 1990s, when the center's
reserves were about half what they are today- $52 million in 1993- the
center (between 1989 and 1994) filed only a dozen suits.

Recently Jim Reddin and Cletus Nelson sent CounterPunch, the newsletter I
coedit with Jeffrey St. Clair, and interesting account of Dees' latest twist
in moneygrubbing.  In its most recent Intelligence Report newsletter, the
SPLC -in a "Special Report"- puts forth the preposterous theory that far
from being a glorious renaissance of the radical spirit in American
political life, the protest against the World Trade Organization, most in
evidence in Seattle and in Washington, DC, at the start of last week, have
been the nexus for a far-flung crypto-facist conspiracy comprised of white
supremacists, neo-Nazis, Ku Klux Klan members and other shock troops of the
far right.  The SPLC's anonymous writer confidently states that the
anarchists, socialists, environmentalists and other left-wing dissidents who
gathered in Seattle at the start of last December were secretly infiltrated
by European-style "Third Position" fascists who mix racism with
environmentalism.  "Right alongside the progressive groups that demonstrated
in Seattle- mostly peaceful defenders of labor, the environment, animal
rights and similar causes- were the hard-edged soldiers of neofascism," the
newsletter excitedly warns.

No documentation is offered to substantiate this allegation.  The newsletter
doesn't name a single right-winger who has infiltrated Direct Action, Food
Not Bombs, Greenpeace or any of the other groups that organized the Seattle
protests.  Dees' pretense is that he stands for civil rights, but of course
the newsletter entirely ignores the civil rights abuses committed by the
Seattle police against the protesters, even though the ACLU has filed a
civil rights suit over the "no protest" zone" declared by city officials.

The attack on the anti-globalization movement marks a significant shift in
the SPLC's policies, suggesting to us that Dees sees material opportunity in
attacking a popular radical cause.  As part of its scourched-earth policy,
the organization has declared war against grassroots environmental
activists.  "They pine for nations of peasant-like folk tied closely to the
land and to their neighbors," the newsletter observes disdainfully.

Some who've followed the FBI's recent disastrous predictions about Y2K
terror attacks from right-wing militias suspect that both the SPLC and the
Anti-Defamation League (which helped fuel the FBI"s Y2K predictions) are
hauling water for the bureau, essentially acting as subcontractors
performing tasks of defamation that in the old COINTELPRO days would have
been performed by the bureau itself.  The worrying fact for fundraisers like
Dees is that there is a distinct shortage of terrifying specters with which
to coax the money out of the pockets of the suckers.  How long can you raise
the alarm about a fascist takeover, when the legions of the ultra-right are
a few beleaguered platoons camped around Hayden Lake, ID?

The Nation, Mother Jones, and kindred liberal publications have the same
problem.  If the fascist/Gingrichian bogey isn't out there in the darkness,
prowling round the campfire, maybe people will start concluding that real
enemy is all too unidentifiably roosting in Washington in the two-party
system.  So the new strategy of the Dees crowd, the SPLC and ADL, is to
point tremulously to such signs of realignment as the Antiwar.com
conference, "Beyond Left and Right," about which I reported a couple of
weeks ago, and raise the alarm, saying -as the Dees Intelligence Report
does- that the left is being duped and captured by the far right and that
realignment is a neo-fascist strategy.  And of course they're strains in the
anti-globalist, anti-free trade movement that can buttress such a charge.
It's not hard to go to a gun show and scoop up a pamphlet attacking the New
World Order along with the UN, the big banks, and the WTO.

American, populist culture has crank patches, as do all political cultures.
In American environmentalism there's a Malthusian element that goes back to
the racist speculations of Harvard professors a century ago.  One task for
us left greens has always been to identify this element and attack it.
Going "beyond left and right" doesn't mean abandoning basic positions on
racism, Malthusianism and the like, it means trying to forge alliances on
issues such as U.S. Interventions and wars, or on the Bill of Rights - and
keeping one's powder dry.  The attack from Dees on the anti-WTO forces won't
be the last.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears

_________________________________________________________________
Cheer a special someone with a fun Halloween eCard from American Greetings! 
Go to  http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/index_msn.pd?source=msne134