[Vision2020] Daily News Peculiarity

Dale Courtney dmcourtn@moscow.com
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:59:53 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0123_01C3927C.F88A9EA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Something is very odd with today's Daily News. 
 
Both Editors (Nathan Alford and Steve McClure) have know since last Saturday
that the 9th Annual History Conference has nothing to do with slavery. They
bit deeply into a hook set for them by a local Stambler-wanna-be. 
 
Yet, they have not written a retraction in their Accuracy Matters column.
Back on 9 August 2003, Nathan Alford wrote:

But there's one more essential ingredient: credibility and trust with you,
the reader. All else is secondary. It's an intangible that we work hard to
earn every day. At the core of every successful newspaper is the unwavering
commitment to an accurate and complete news report, free of bias and
opinion. 

And today they ran a Letter to the Editor from Martha Foster where she is
perplexed that such a topic has been chosen for the upcoming conference. We
are all still perplexed, since it's factually incorrect. 
 
Well, imagine Martha's surprise when she finds out 
    a) that it is not the topic, 
    b) that the Daily News chose to publish her letter anyway (more chum in
the water?), and 
    c) that the Editors could have published a retraction in Monday's paper
(or Tuesday's) and chose not to. 
 
Alford continues: "At the Daily News, we're conscious of our obligation. And
it's healthy to remind ourselves and you every so often that accuracy is an
absolute priority."
 
Yet the article by Bacharach was completely written before the interview
with Wilson ever took place (was turned in by 5:00 and the interview started
at 2:00). And all of the material that he presented to her (see:
<http://lists2.fsr.net/pipermail/vision2020/2003-October/004826.html>
http://lists2.fsr.net/pipermail/vision2020/2003-October/004826.html) was
disregarded. 
 
If a paper runs an article with half the truth, and publishes it so that
people will be intentionally mislead (as Martha Foster was), does that meet
Alford's desire that: "Anything less than a 100 percent accurate report has
the potential to undermine our most valuable resource - credibility." 
 
Yet, to bolster the paper's "credibility," they run a front-page article
based on an anonymous flier that was designed to be slanderous and
intentionally mislead the town. 
 
Hmmm, let's see: anonymous flier, factually incorrect data, slanderous
material, intentionally misleading material, ... Now that meets Alford's
goal of a paper with credibility for you!
 
But, hey! It generates sales for the paper. 
 
So tell me again, how does one move up in the Journalism world? 
 
Best,
Dale
----------
We must also read the poets, acquaint ourselves with histories, study and
peruse the masters and authors in every excellent art, and by way of
practice, praise, expound, emend, criticize and confute them; we must argue
every question on both sides, and bring out on every topic whatever points
can be deemed plausible.  Cicero, The Making of an Orator
 
Dale M. Courtney
Lecturer in Information Systems
Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 
MCSE/MCDBA, Information Architect
phone:(831)214-4353; dmcourtn@moscow.com

  <http://courtneys.us/images/MCDBA_SE.jpg> 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0123_01C3927C.F88A9EA0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2>Something is very odd&nbsp;with today's <EM>Daily News</EM>.=20
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Both=20
Editors (Nathan Alford and Steve McClure) have know since last Saturday =
that the=20
9th Annual History Conference has <U>nothing</U> to do with slavery. =
They bit=20
<U>deeply</U> into a hook set for them by a local Stambler-wanna-be.=20
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Yet,=20
they have not written a retraction in their <EM>Accuracy Matters</EM> =
column.=20
Back on 9 August 2003, Nathan Alford wrote:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV><FONT color=3D#800000><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2>But there's one more essential ingredient: credibility and =
trust with=20
  you, the reader. All else is secondary. </FONT></SPAN><SPAN=20
  class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It's an =
intangible that we=20
  work hard to earn every day. </FONT></SPAN></FONT><SPAN=20
  class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2><FONT=20
  color=3D#800000>At the core of every successful newspaper is the =
unwavering=20
  commitment to an accurate and complete news report, free of bias and =
opinion.=20
  </FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>And=20
today they ran a Letter to the Editor from Martha Foster where she is =
perplexed=20
that such a topic has been chosen for the upcoming conference. We are =
all still=20
perplexed, since it's factually incorrect. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Well,=20
imagine Martha's surprise when she finds out </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; a) that it is <U>not</U> the topic,=20
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; b) that the Daily News chose to publish her =
letter=20
anyway (more chum in the water?), and </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; c) that the Editors <U>could</U> have =
published a=20
retraction in Monday's paper (or Tuesday's) and chose not to.=20
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Alford=20
continues: "<FONT color=3D#800000>At the Daily News, we're conscious of =
our=20
obligation. And it's healthy to remind ourselves and you every so often =
that=20
accuracy is an absolute priority.</FONT>"</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D004283300-15102003>Yet=20
the article by Bacharach was completely written before the interview =
with Wilson=20
ever took place (was turned in by 5:00 and the interview started at =
2:00). And=20
all of the material that he presented to her (see: <A=20
title=3Dhttp://lists2.fsr.net/pipermail/vision2020/2003-October/004826.ht=
ml=20
href=3D"http://lists2.fsr.net/pipermail/vision2020/2003-October/004826.ht=
ml"><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New =
Roman">http://lists2.fsr.net/pipermail/vision2020/2003-October/004826.htm=
l</FONT></A>)=20
was disregarded. </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D004283300-15102003></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D004283300-15102003>If a=20
paper runs an article with half the truth, and publishes it so that =
people will=20
be intentionally mislead (as Martha Foster was), does that meet Alford's =
desire=20
that: "<FONT color=3D#800000>Anything less than a 100 percent accurate =
report has=20
the potential to undermine our most valuable resource - =
credibility.</FONT>"=20
</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D004283300-15102003></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D004283300-15102003>Yet,=20
to bolster the paper's "credibility," they run a front-page article =
based on an=20
anonymous flier that was designed to be slanderous and intentionally =
mislead the=20
town. </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D004283300-15102003></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D004283300-15102003>Hmmm,=20
let's see: anonymous flier, factually incorrect data, slanderous =
material,=20
intentionally misleading material, ... Now <U>that</U> meets Alford's =
goal of a=20
paper with credibility for you!</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial><FONT color=3D#0000ff><FONT size=3D2>But, hey! =
It=20
generates&nbsp;<SPAN class=3D004283300-15102003>sales for the paper.=20
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial><FONT color=3D#0000ff><FONT size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D004283300-15102003></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial><FONT color=3D#0000ff><FONT size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D004283300-15102003>So tell me again, how does one move up in the =

Journalism world? </SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Best,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Vladimir Script" color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D5>Dale</FONT><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D4><BR>----------<BR><B><FONT =
color=3D#000099><EM>We=20
must also read the poets, acquaint ourselves with histories, study and =
peruse=20
the masters and authors in every excellent art, and by way of practice, =
praise,=20
expound, emend, criticize and confute them; we must argue every question =
on both=20
sides, and bring out on every topic whatever points can be deemed=20
plausible</EM>.&nbsp; Cicero, <U>The Making of an=20
Orator</U></FONT></B></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D4>Dale M. =
Courtney</FONT><BR><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D4>Lecturer in Information =
Systems<BR>Naval=20
Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D4>MCSE/MCDBA, Information=20
Architect<BR>phone:(831)214-4353; <A=20
href=3D"mailto:dmcourtn@moscow.com">dmcourtn@moscow.com</A></FONT></DIV>
<P><IMG height=3D56 src=3D"http://courtneys.us/images/MCDBA_SE.jpg" =
width=3D126=20
border=3D0></P>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0123_01C3927C.F88A9EA0--