[Vision2020] Fwd: Legislative Newsletter IX
Tom Trail
ttrail@moscow.com
Sun, 30 Mar 2003 07:57:47 -0800
>
>
>
> LEGISLATIVE NEWSLETTER XI MARCH 24-28/03
>
>Dear Constitutents:
>
>The 57th session of the Idaho Legislature may establish a new record for the
>longest session in trying to arrive at final approval for a budget and tax
>increases to support the budget. I will be leaving the Legislature on April
>3rd. Our grandson, Matthew, age 15 months has been suffering from Russells
>Syndrome since birth, and he had a recent setback. We feel our place is with
>Matthew and his family. Former State Representative Gary Young will
>fill in as
>my substitute. Gary know the legislative ropes, and will support my position
>on supporting the Governor's budget and the tax increases necessary
>to do the job. You can contact Gary at my desk phone (208) 332-1202
>or use my state e
>mail # ttrail@house.state.id.us. I want to thank Gary for filling in for me.
>
> 1. Budget for Public Education-Many legislators campaigned to support public
> education. It appears that the conservatives were willing to support a
> appropriation of $920 million--the exact amount that the state
>approved for
> fiscal year 03.
>
> However, when one considers that we hadd about $60.8 million in dedicated
> funds last year and that projectons are for no more than $41.9 million
> this year then we are faced with an additional $20 million shortfall for
> public education. Part of the problem comes about because of
>no carry over
> funds, loss of revenue from endowment funds, increased
>transportation costs
> inflation, property tax replacement, and additional medical
>costs for staff
>
> The impact of this $20 million shortfall is reflected in terms of three
> budget alternatives--$920/$930/and $943--the Governor's budget. Every
> school district in the state loses under the $920 and $930
>million senario.
> It is only when we reach the Governor's $943 million budget for public
> education that districts break even. Under the $920 and $930 million
> senario this would represent reductions at the local school district of
> from 1.5% to 2.5%.
>
> Much talk has taken place about the "big" increases for public education
> over the past 20 years. A major reason for increases is the significant
> number of unfunded federal and state mandates that have forced local
> and at times the state to increase funding for these mandates.
>One example
> is that in 1974 Congress mandated the Special Education Program, and
> promised to pick up 70% of the funding. This promise was not
>kept and last
> year the State and Districts had to pick up 84% of Special
>Education costs.
> As Pogo said, "The Enemy is Us."
>
> 2. Higher Education Budgets--I support the Governor's budget for Higher
> Ed. Anything less would be devastating after the 10% holdback of last
> year. We also need to pass the facilities bonding proposal of
>the Governor
> This would enable the U. of Idaho to build the $11 million Teaching-
> Learning Center, and it would create 300 construction jobs.
>
> 3. Taxes--Conservatives are now talking about an omnibus sin tax bill which
> depending on what sins you tax and by how much could raise $100 - $120
> million. Sin taxes are risky and consumption of whatever sin you tax
> usually drops off during the initial stages of the new tax. The sin tax
> approach plus a one percent sales tax would probably raise enough
> revenue to support the Governor's budget, and I will support
>this approach.
>
> 4. Other Bills
>
> a. Resolution to Pull the U.S. Out of the U.N. was deep sixed
>in committee
>
> b. HB169 A--Changes in the Rape Statues will be voted on in the Senate
> probably on Monday.
>
> c. HB391--This is the new grass burning bill. The bill
>includes penalit-
> ies of $10,000 for violations of growers. The bill was voted out of
> the Ag Affairs Committee. We've asked for an Attorney General's
> Opinion about the bill. If the bill has some constitutional flaws
> then I'd find it hard to support it. A companion bill being intro-
> duced in Rev and Tax would provide a $100 tax credit/acre
>for a period
> of ten years if a grower would agree not to burn bluegrass. The
> credit would be marketable, and if the grower broke the
>agreement they
> would have to pay back all credits to the state tax commission. This
> is a proposal that looks promising and one that I would support.
>
> d. HB359--This bill would have established a merit pay system for new
> teachers in Idaho, a system based largely on "student Performance."
> Most people felt this meant student test scores. Several teachers
> pointed out that paying some teachers more than others based on
> student test scores would create an unwanted environment of
>competition
> in schools. Factors such as the influence of the family, soci-
> economic factors, English as a second language, etc. were factors
> that at best of times would not provide a level playing field to
> make reliable and valid evaluation of teacher's performance. The
> bill was held in committee by a 9-8 vote.
>
> I'll be sending out a final wrap up Newsletter of the Legislature in another
> three weeks.
>
> Rep. Tom Trail/Dist. 6
--
Dr. Tom Trail
International Trails
1375 Mt. View Rd.
Moscow, Id. 83843
Tel: (208) 882-6077
Fax: (208) 882-0896
e mail ttrail@moscow.com