[Vision2020] Pro-war songs'
Robert Dickow
dickow@uidaho.edu
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 13:11:58 -0800
Worley's song is actually rather a nice one, and does a great job of
stirring up anger and stuff. Too bad it's such a good song. It's a shame
such sentiments have to be reinforced, we need to keep a collective calm
head...insofar as possible. Reason should prevail.
But I come back to the age old question: Does art mold society, or does it
simply reflect it? Maybe both, but to what degree and in what fashion? Does
squelching such artistic sentiments really change anything?
'Ars credendum ergo siccum vernaculus bachanalus verum, causum bankus
accountae vides!'
Bob Dickow
----- Original Message -----
From: "Debbie Gray" <dgray@uidaho.edu>
> The First Amendment deals with making laws that inhibit the expression of
> the people. It does not deal with private companies deciding against
> playing something in their radio station, whether in response to consumer
> complaints, sponsor complaints, or their own decision. You can vote your
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Dale Courtney wrote:
> >
> > Well, maybe I *shouldn't* be surprised.
> >
> > It has been banned on many stations throughout the country.
> >
> > So much for "freedom of speech".
> >