[Vision2020] Revisionist Workplace rules: Sexual harassment=sex
Ted Moffett
ted_moffett@hotmail.com
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 20:52:47 +0000
Tim wrote:
> > >> So for one last time, Folks, when Bill
> > committed
> > >>perjury, he was NOT LYING ABOUT SEX or being a
> > serial
> > >>adulterer he was lying in a deposition after he
> > had
> > >>been named as the defendant in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT
> > >>SUIT. > they
> > >>said it was JUST ABOUT SEX.
> > >>
If I understand you correctly, in the above comment you are linking the
statement that Clinton was "lying about sex" to the Paula Jones case,
asserting that this statement "Clinton's lies were just about sex," applies
to his conduct in the Paula Jones case, and is therefore inaccurate, because
lying about sexual harassment is more serious than "just lying about sex."
But in fact any lies Clinton told in this matter were only verified in the
Lewinsky case, as far as I know, in which case the statement that Clinton
was "just lying about sex" is correct, and so therefore does not indicate a
hypocritical attitude. Lewinsky was a willing partner in consensual conduct
between adults.
Concerning your claim that some Democrats were not as fervent a defender of
women's rights as their feminist ideology should inspire in how they viewed
the Paula Jones case, I think you are right. There is no big news in this
revelation. Republicans are not now going after Bush for his "lies" with
the same fervor they went after Clinton for his. If they were consistent
fervent defenders of presidential integrity, Bush would be under tremendous
fire from most Republicans, but he is not, of course. But again, this is
just what is to be expected based on partisan loyalty.
My focus was on the comment you made about Clinton's lies. In the case of
Lewinsky, lies were admitted and they were "just about sex" between
consenting adults. So the people making this statement "Clinton's lies were
just about sex." are not being hypocritical, even if they are defenders of
women's rights. In the Paula Jones case, the facts were never proven
sufficiently, as far as I can discern, to state conclusively who was lying,
or if sexual harassment ever took place. Clinton's lies concerning Paula
Jones are speculation.
I hope this clarifies my point.
Ted
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail