[Vision2020] Revisionist Workplace rules: Sexual harassment=sex

[Tim Lohrmann]

Visionaries,
     It's amazing really. Almost everyone who
commented on my posts are in such denial that their
blow dried slick willie could have been not exactly
respectful of women. 
   Bob Hoffman's and Joan Opyr's last posts were  good
examples. 
   So for one last time, Folks, when Bill committed
perjury, he was NOT LYING ABOUT SEX or being a serial
adulterer he was lying in a deposition after he had
been named as the defendant in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT
SUIT. If you consider alleged sexual harassment(in
this case the chief exec. officer of a state sending
Ark State Troopers out to summon a young woman who was
in the employ of that state up to his room and
exposing himself demanding sexual gratification) as
comparable to just another sexual encounter then your
views on rights of women in the workplace may come
from the nineties--but the nineties of the last
century.
  That's why I brought this up. To point out the
complete lack of principle in both parties. And how it
is often transferred to the knee-jerk defenders of
them. IF a GOP Pres. had been named in a sexual
harassment suit the supposedly feminist minded
Democrat party and their feminist allies would have
been enraged and sputtering into any available
microphone about what a pig he was. 
   BUT since he was who he was--linked to their own
political futures--heard next to nothing from the
demos and the feminists. Just as on this list, they
said it was JUST ABOUT SEX. 
   Principles in present day two party politics? As an
elderly neighbor of mine used to "they ain't got
na'arn!"
   Later, TL

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com