[Vision2020] Re: Constitutional Ban on Gay Marriage
Tom Hansen
thansen@moscow.com
Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:14:02 -0700
Greetings Visionaires -
I have absolutely no qualms with same-sex relationships/marriages. Where I
agree with the law is that sex with an underage person is rape (statutory),
be it heterosexual or homosexual, consentual or non-consentual. Again, it
is that simple.
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vision2020-admin@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com]On
> Behalf Of Scott Dredge
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 12:56 AM
> To: vision2020@moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Re: Constitutional Ban on Gay Marriage
>
>
> Where do you discriminate between consensual man-woman
> relationships and <fill in the blank> man-girl
> relationships? After determining the answers to this
> exercise, go back and replace man-woman to man-man or
> women-women, and man-girl with man-boy or woman-girl
> in the orignal question. Do you get a different
> answer?
>
> I get the same answer. Equality is my standard and it
> is backed by the United States Constitution.
>
> -Scott
>
> --- John Moss <johnmoss@moscow.com> wrote:
> -- Snip --
> >
> > And, while we are at, by what standard, Donovan, do
> > you discriminate between the normalcy of consenual
> > man-man relationships and the perversion of
> > consensual man-boy relationships?
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > John
> >
>
> _____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>