[RPPTL Leasing Committee] 9/27/21 Re: comments by 9am tomorrow

[RPPTL Real Estate Leasing Committee]

Good morning- I agree as well-- Reject mandatory mediation for all leases- for the many reasons presented thus far.
     Have a good day,
Adrienne
Adrienne F. Promoff
Miami
-----Original Message-----
From: 
Sent: Sep 26, 2021 7:06 PM
To: landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org 
Cc: Christopher A. Sajdera , Michael J. Gelfand 
Subject: Re: [RPPTL Leasing Committee] comments by 9am tomorrow

I completely agree with the reasoning of Deborah Marks to reject this idea of mediation for all leases. I feel it is bad policy from both a legal perspective for landlords, and for the leasing market. To me this just opens the door to encourage dishonest tenants to not pay the rent or play games and force the landlord's hand to spend money and lose time and rent for a mediation, rather than just filing an action for a quicker writ of possession. We need to encourage tenants to be good tenants, lease properties within their financial means, and perform under their leases. Under the current proposal, it appears successful landlords in the mediation can't even recover mediation fees. Please keep in mind that the lease scenario is also different from most foreclosures because the foreclosing landlord will many times be individuals, and not well financed banks. Many residential landlords will not have the funds to regularly battle game-playing tenants in mediations like a foreclosing bank would or like a large apartment complex owner would. I agree with Deborah that this policy will force many landlords to increase the deposit amounts or require a larger payment of the rent up front to prepare for this risk of protracted mediation. Then, that most likely hurts leasing market because a lot of tenants don't have the money to pay an entire year or even 6 months of rent up front, even if they have solid jobs: otherwise they would be homeowners. If a tenant doesn't pay rent or leave at the end of the lease term, the tenant needs to be evicted as soon as possible and as cost-effective to the landlord. If the landlord is the one acting badly, the tenants have rights under Chapter 83 and can collect attorney's fees if the prevailing party.
 
Sincerely,
Ben Wilson
 
Benjamin E. Wilson. Esq.
The Viera Company
7380 Murrell Road
Suite 201
Viera, FL 32940
Phone: (321) 242-1200
Email: Benjamin.Wilson at duda.com
 
Sent from my iPhone
 
On Sep 26, 2021, at 4:29 PM, RPPTL Real Estate Leasing Committee > wrote:
 
External Email!
Use caution when following links as they could open malicious web sites or include attachment files that can contain a virus.
________________________________
 
I completely agree with Deborah.
 
 
Gioia DeCarlo, Esq.
Escobar & DeCarlo, LLC
1341 SW 1st St.
Miami, FL 33135
T. 305-324-9823
F. 305-677-9295
 
A portion of this firm’s practice includes the collections of debts. If we are attempting to collect a debt we believe you owe, you are advised that any and all information you provide to us will be used in an effort to collect such debt.
 
This e-mail transmission and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, are confidential and are protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of any of the information contained in, or attached to this e-mail transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify me by forwarding this e-mail to Info at edclawl.com, or by telephone at (305) 324-9823 and then delete the message and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
 
 
From: > on behalf of RPPTL Real Estate Leasing Committee >
Reply-To: >
Date: Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 3:05 PM
To: >
Cc: "Christopher A. Sajdera" >, "Michael J. Gelfand" >
Subject: Re: [RPPTL Leasing Committee] comments by 9am tomorrow
 
Totally opposed to mandatory mediation for residential tenancies. Unlike foreclosures, the tenants have no equity in the property that they are going to lose because something happened and rarely have legit defenses- and when they do have legit defenses they get mediation under the current system. There is no security for the landlord that is protected during the delay time- (i.e. the equity). Every day of delay when Tenant is not paying is pure loss to the landlord that they did not contemplate when executing the lease. The leases executed to date were based upon a contract entered into based upon a statute that said if the tenant did not pay they could send a three day letter and then if the money is not put into the court registry a writ issues pretty damn fast. If the landlord expects a protracted eviction with mediation, they need a much much larger security deposit. And, mediate what? The landlord being pushed to just take less for what consideration?
 
I understand the sympathy for tenants, but this is an undue interference with contractual rights that were based upon current statutes and retroactively interfering with them is unfair.
 
Off soapbox now.
 
Deborah Marks
Deborah Marks, PLLC
18495 South Dixie Highway
Suite 134
Miami, FL 33157
305-372-9400
 
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 1:44 PM RPPTL Real Estate Leasing Committee > wrote:
Please review and comment on the attached, along with practical issues. Please respond by 9am tomorrow.
 
Christopher A. Sajdera, Esquire
Board Certified Specialist, Condominium and Planned Development Law
 
Sajdera, PA
 
Palm Beach Office:
200 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 103
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Direct: 561-910-3082
Phone: 561-948-4000
Facsimile: 561-948-6052
 
Broward Office:
2005 W. Cypress Creek Rd., Suite 203
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
Phone: 954-869-0980
Facsimile: 954-869-0981
 
Email: cas at saj-law.com
 
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited and you must delete it without reading it.
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
landten mailing list
landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten
--
Deborah Marks, PLLC
18495 S. Dixie Highway
Ste 134
Miami, FL 33157
305-372-9400
deborahmarkslaw at gmail.com
deborah at deborahmarks.law
synergy928 at aol.com
_______________________________________________ landten mailing list landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten
_______________________________________________
landten mailing list
landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten
 
_______________________________________________
landten mailing list
landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten