[RPPTL Leasing Committee] Unlawful Detainer Eviction - Issuing Summons to Unknown Occupant/John Doe

Fri Jan 8 04:04:42 PST 2021

Brenda

I suggest that you appoint a few good lawyers to draft  legislation. I would suggest Mark Brown to Chair the committee. He Chaired the legislation committee on Unlawful Detainer.  The other approach would be to ask for an attorney general's opinion.

Thank You,
Roland "Chip" Waller
Esquire
Direct: 727-836-8515
Office: 727-847-2288
Fax: 727-848-4183
E-service: pleadings at rdwaller.com<mailto:pleadings at rdwaller.com>
Hearings:  hearings at rdwaller.com<mailto:hearings at rdwaller.com>

Roland.Waller at rdwaller.com<mailto:Roland.Waller at rdwaller.com>
[cid:image001.png at 01D6E58C.3A05A940]

COVID-19 NOTICE: Our Firm has taken significant precautions to ensure as sterile an office environment as possible for our employees, clients and colleagues. If you are not feeling well, we ask that you please not visit our office at this time. Additionally, even if you are not symptomatic but you have recently traveled to areas where the virus is more prevalent, we likewise request you abstain from visiting our offices at this time. Instead, please contact our office to make alternative arrangements for your transaction or matter. We will do whatever we can to accommodate you. Thank you.

Leave us a review<https://search.google.com/local/writereview?placeid=ChIJFSKLui2QwogR_-nzH5X23hc>

Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Attorney
Fellow, American College of Real Estate Lawyers

[cid:image002.jpg at 01D6E58C.3A05A940]   [cid:image003.png at 01D6E58C.3A05A940] [cid:image004.jpg at 01D6E58C.3A05A940]

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org <landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> On Behalf Of RPPTL Real Estate Leasing Committee
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:56 PM
To: landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Cc: Ryan Purvis <Ryan at kfernandezlaw.com>
Subject: Re: [RPPTL Leasing Committee] Unlawful Detainer Eviction - Issuing Summons to Unknown Occupant/John Doe

We ran into a the same issue last week with a property in Okaloosa County.  The Clerk of Court told us we can file a Motion with the judge to order the Summons to John Doe/Unknown Occupant, but that the sheriff would not execute the Writ of Possession.  We then called the Civil Process department at the sheriff's and the representative told us that the sheriff will not serve a Writ of Possession on John Doe/Unknown Occupant.

Kristopher E. Fernandez, Esquire
Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Attorney
114 S. Fremont Avenue
Tampa, FL  33606
(813) 832-6340
(813) 601-3257 (after hours)
(813) 251-0438 (fax)

NOTICE: This email (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, is confidential and legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Thank you.

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> <landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>> On Behalf Of RPPTL Real Estate Leasing Committee
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:41 PM
To: landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [RPPTL Leasing Committee] Unlawful Detainer Eviction - Issuing Summons to Unknown Occupant/John Doe

Hello all,

Does anyone know of any quick case law to support issuing a summons to an Unknown Occupant/John Doe in an eviction context?  I.e., something in the case law or Rules to support not naming a Defendant, when their name isn't known?

A client in Alachua is dealing with a squatter, and sent it to our firm as an unlawful detainer eviction.  As we do in all other counties, we filed naming the Defendant as "Unknown Occupant" since the property doesn't know who is inside.

While all other counties have processed our past cases against "Unknown Occupant" without issue, the Alachua clerk refused to issue a summons.  They stated that they could only issue a summons against a named person.  I talked to the clerk, then the clerk's supervisor, and then the General Counsel for the Clerk.  All gave me the same answer, that it was against the law to issue a summons against an unnamed party.

When I said that every other county issued eviction summons against "Unknown Occupant" without any pushback, the General Counsel said that every other county was in violation of the law and civil procedure.  When I asked how my client is supposed to file against a squatter they don't know the General Counsel said that all other unlawful detainers they filed listed a named person, and I was the first person to ever bring this issue up to them.

The General Counsel also sent me their memo on Unknown Persons summonses, which is below.  It cites one case.  I Shephardized their case and it is still good law, however it was a case for money damages.  My first thought was that the eviction for possession only is technically just against the premises, not the actual person, so that could be a way to distinguish.  I haven't been able to find anything exactly on point.

SUMMONSES ON UNKNOWN PERSONS PROCEDURE

Effective January 15, 2009. the Clerk's Office established its policy of not issuing summonses on and unknown persons. This is based on research determining the Clerk's Office has no authority to issue a summons on an unknown person or a John/Jane Doe as a John Doe complaint does not commence an action against the real party. See Grantham v. Blount, Inc., 683 So.2d 538 (2d DCA 1996), ("we choose to treat a John Doe complaint in the same manner we treat a complaint that contains a substantially incorrect identification of the defendant and hold that it does not commence an action against the real party").

Thanks in advance for the help,

Matt

Matthew Siegel, Esq.
Countryside Colonial Center
2753 SR 580, Suite 209
Clearwater, FL 33761-3351
P 727-726-1900
F 727-726-7440
matt at mgfdlaw.com<mailto:matt at mgfdlaw.com>
Primary Eservice: eservice at mgfdlaw.com<mailto:eservice at mgfdlaw.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/landten/attachments/20210108/caac11e3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 31466 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/landten/attachments/20210108/caac11e3/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 16139 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/landten/attachments/20210108/caac11e3/image002-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5110 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/landten/attachments/20210108/caac11e3/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3688 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/landten/attachments/20210108/caac11e3/image004-0001.jpg>