[RPPTL LandTen] Security deposits

[Bob Wunker]

While the landlord ought have a security interest in the deposit during the
term of the lease, the landlord probably did not obtain a perfected
security interest by filing a UCC-1.

Bob Wunker

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:35 AM, David Weisman <David.Weisman at gmlaw.com>
wrote:

> It seems that during the term of the Lease, the Landlord has a security
> interest in the SD. After it is returnable, the creditor can get at it.
>
> David  Weisman
> Board Certified Real Estate Lawyer
> Greenspoon Marder, P.A.
> 200 E. Broward Blvd., Suite 1800
> Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
> Phone 954-491-1120 Ext. 1015
> Direct Phone 954-343-6941
>
> David.Weisman at gmlaw.com
> www.GMlaw.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces at lists.
> flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Todd Allen
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 9:51 AM
> To: landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
> Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] Security deposits
>
> Has anyone dealt with a garnishment served on the landlord?  The creditor
> is trying to grab the security deposit.  I’m not able to find anything
> saying it cannot be grabbed by the creditor, so I assume it’s free game.
>
> Does anyone have any conflicting insight?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message contains information from Lindsay &
> Allen, PLLC that may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the
> addressee, please be advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> other use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you are the
> intended recipient and a client of the law firm, please preserve your
> attorney-client privilege by NOT showing this message to others and keeping
> its contents confidential.
>
> UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT NOTICE: If this communication concerns
> negotiation of a contract or agreement, unless otherwise expressly stated
> in writing, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act does not apply to this
> communication. Contract formation in this matter occurs subject to our
> clients’ final review and manually affixing of original signatures on
> original documents.
>
> EVIDENTIARY PRIVILEGE: To the extent that this message is a communication
> to settle a claim, all evidentiary limitations on its use are hereby
> expressly made applicable to its contents.
>
> FEDERAL FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT NOTICE: To the extent that
> this message is an effort to collect a consumer debt, you are hereby
> notified that this is a communication from a debt collector and that all
> information provided in response to this message may be used for debt
> collection purposes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> landten mailing list
> landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten
>
> --
> The information contained in this transmission may be attorney/client
> privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by reply e-mail.
>
> Unless specifically indicated otherwise, any discussion of tax issues
> contained in this e-mail, including any attachments, is not, and is not
> intended to be, ''written advice'' as defined in Section 10.37 of Treasury
> Department Circular 230.
>
> A portion of our practice involves the collection of debt and any
> information you provide will be used for that purpose if we are attempting
> to collect a debt from you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> landten mailing list
> landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/landten/attachments/20170511/2fa8e0dd/attachment.html>