[RPPTL LandTen] Security deposits
Haney, Gregory
ghaney at slk-law.com
Thu May 11 07:44:04 PDT 2017
Seems to me that only unencumbered assets, or assets in which the creditor has a priority interest at least, are fair game. Surely there is an argument that this not how you would characterize a deposit held by a landlord, but I have not dealt with that issue. I do have a client against which a receiver has proceeded for the tenant's deposit, but it's a different situation because the landlord/client had applied it to a default already (and the receiver was using the tenant’s space without paying rent). I assume that is not your situation.
Gregory R. Haney | Shumaker
Attorney at Law
Board Certified in Real Estate Law
Bank of America Plaza, Suite 2800
101 East Kennedy Boulevard | Tampa, FL 33602
Direct 813.227.2277 | Fax 813.229.1660
ghaney at slk-law.com | bio<http://www.slk-law.com/Professionals/Gregory-Scott-R-Haney> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregoryhaney>
________________________________
Confidentiality Statement: This electronic message contains information from the law firm of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, and may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or telephone 800.444.6659.
-----Original Message-----
From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Todd Allen
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 9:51 AM
To: landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] Security deposits
Has anyone dealt with a garnishment served on the landlord? The creditor is trying to grab the security deposit. I’m not able to find anything saying it cannot be grabbed by the creditor, so I assume it’s free game.
Does anyone have any conflicting insight?
Thanks
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message contains information from Lindsay & Allen, PLLC that may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the addressee, please be advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you are the intended recipient and a client of the law firm, please preserve your attorney-client privilege by NOT showing this message to others and keeping its contents confidential.
UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT NOTICE: If this communication concerns negotiation of a contract or agreement, unless otherwise expressly stated in writing, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act does not apply to this communication. Contract formation in this matter occurs subject to our clients’ final review and manually affixing of original signatures on original documents.
EVIDENTIARY PRIVILEGE: To the extent that this message is a communication to settle a claim, all evidentiary limitations on its use are hereby expressly made applicable to its contents.
FEDERAL FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT NOTICE: To the extent that this message is an effort to collect a consumer debt, you are hereby notified that this is a communication from a debt collector and that all information provided in response to this message may be used for debt collection purposes.
_______________________________________________
landten mailing list
landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/landten/attachments/20170511/4c6ff65c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the landten
mailing list